--- title: "mcp-trust-plane vs casdoor" type: "comparison" canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/abluva-research-mcp-trust-plane-vs-casdoor-casdoor" tools: ["abluva-research-mcp-trust-plane", "casdoor-casdoor"] --- # mcp-trust-plane vs casdoor *GraphCanon updated Aug 19, 2026* ## Verdict Pick mcp-trust-plane if mCP Trust Plane is designed for organizations that need to enforce security policies on MCP traffic without modifying core components of the protocol stack; pick casdoor if casdoor is an open-source solution for identity and access management (IAM), with robust agent-first capabilities that integrate with various authentication protocols including OAuth, OIDC, SAML, CAS, LDAP, SCIM, WebAuth. [mcp-trust-plane](https://github.com/abluva-research/mcp-trust-plane) reports 99 GitHub stars, 25 forks, and 0 open issues, last pushed Jun 19, 2026. [casdoor](https://casdoor.ai) has 14k stars, 1.8k forks, and 105 open issues, last pushed Aug 18, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [mcp-trust-plane's repository](https://github.com/abluva-research/mcp-trust-plane) and [casdoor's repository](https://github.com/casdoor/casdoor). | | [mcp-trust-plane](/tools/abluva-research-mcp-trust-plane.md) | [casdoor](/tools/casdoor-casdoor.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Tagline | Pluggable security framework for MCP traffic | An open-source Agent-first Identity and Access Management (IAM) / LLM MCP & agent gateway and auth server | | Stars | 99 | 14,221 | | Forks | 25 | 1,777 | | Open issues | 0 | 105 | | Language | JavaScript | Go | | Adopt for | MCP Trust Plane is designed for organizations that need to enforce security policies on MCP traffic without modifying core components of the protocol stack. | Casdoor is an open-source solution for identity and access management (IAM), with robust agent-first capabilities that integrate with various authentication protocols including OAuth, OIDC, SAML, CAS, LDAP, SCIM, WebAuth | | Persona | - | - | | Runtime | - | - | | License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 | | Categories | AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability | AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability | ## Trust and health _Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._ | | [mcp-trust-plane](/tools/abluva-research-mcp-trust-plane.md) | [casdoor](/tools/casdoor-casdoor.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Maintenance | Steady (60%) | Very active (96%) | | Days since push | 51d | 0d | | Open issues (now) | 0 | 105 | | Stars delta | Unknown | +248 (30d) | | Open issues delta | Unknown | +2 (30d) | | Full report | [trust report](/tools/abluva-research-mcp-trust-plane/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/casdoor-casdoor/trust.md) | ## Decision facts: mcp-trust-plane - **Pricing:** freemium - MCP Trust Plane is open-source under Apache 2.0, making it available at no cost but provides flexibility to extend commercially through proprietary filter implementations. - **Requirements:** Min 1 GB RAM - **Adopt for:** MCP Trust Plane is designed for organizations that need to enforce security policies on MCP traffic without modifying core components of the protocol stack. ## Decision facts: casdoor - **Adopt for:** Casdoor is an open-source solution for identity and access management (IAM), with robust agent-first capabilities that integrate with various authentication protocols including OAuth, OIDC, SAML, CAS, LDAP, SCIM, WebAuth ## Choose when ### Choose mcp-trust-plane if… - mcp-trust-plane is primarily JavaScript; casdoor is Go. - Pricing: MCP Trust Plane is open-source under Apache 2.0, making it available at no cost but provides flexibility to extend commercially through proprietary filter implementations.. - Requirements: Min 1 GB RAM. - Tags unique to mcp-trust-plane: access-control, ai-agents, data-governance-and-ai, data-security. - MCP Trust Plane should be used when you require granular control over tool calls in your MCP-enabled systems, such as enforcing PII redaction or operation blocking. ### Choose casdoor if… - casdoor is primarily Go; mcp-trust-plane is JavaScript. - Tags unique to casdoor: agent, agi, ai-gateway, auth. - When you require a comprehensive IAM tool that supports multiple authentication methods such as OAuth, OIDC, SAML, CAS, LDAP, and more. ## When NOT to use mcp-trust-plane - Avoid MCP Trust Plane if your security needs do not require modification of traffic post-response, as it introduces an additional layer of complexity and latency. - MCP Trust Plane may not be the best choice for environments that strictly enforce language-specific policies since its filters are written in any language and must comply with a strict contract. ## When NOT to use casdoor - If your project requires proprietary technology exclusivity and cannot utilize open-source tools like Casdoor licensed under Apache-2.0. - When the depth of integration with specific authentication methods (e.g., some advanced SAML configurations) is critical, and you find that other competitors offer more specialized or better-detailed/ - +customizable versions of support for those methods. - If your environment strictly requires closed-source components for security reasons, thus Casdoor would not be a suitable choice due to its open nature. ## Common questions ### What is the difference between mcp-trust-plane and casdoor? mcp-trust-plane: Pluggable security framework for MCP traffic. casdoor: An open-source Agent-first Identity and Access Management (IAM) / LLM MCP & agent gateway and auth server. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories. ### When should I choose mcp-trust-plane over casdoor? Choose mcp-trust-plane over casdoor when mcp-trust-plane is primarily JavaScript; casdoor is Go; Pricing: MCP Trust Plane is open-source under Apache 2.0, making it available at no cost but provides flexibility to extend commercially through proprietary filter implementations.; Requirements: Min 1 GB RAM; Tags unique to mcp-trust-plane: access-control, ai-agents, data-governance-and-ai, data-security; MCP Trust Plane should be used when you require granular control over tool calls in your MCP-enabled systems, such as enforcing PII redaction or operation blocking. ### When should I choose casdoor over mcp-trust-plane? Choose casdoor over mcp-trust-plane when casdoor is primarily Go; mcp-trust-plane is JavaScript; Tags unique to casdoor: agent, agi, ai-gateway, auth; When you require a comprehensive IAM tool that supports multiple authentication methods such as OAuth, OIDC, SAML, CAS, LDAP, and more. ### When should I avoid mcp-trust-plane? Avoid MCP Trust Plane if your security needs do not require modification of traffic post-response, as it introduces an additional layer of complexity and latency. MCP Trust Plane may not be the best choice for environments that strictly enforce language-specific policies since its filters are written in any language and must comply with a strict contract. ### When should I avoid casdoor? If your project requires proprietary technology exclusivity and cannot utilize open-source tools like Casdoor licensed under Apache-2.0. When the depth of integration with specific authentication methods (e.g., some advanced SAML configurations) is critical, and you find that other competitors offer more specialized or better-detailed/ +customizable versions of support for those methods. If your environment strictly requires closed-source components for security reasons, thus Casdoor would not be a suitable choice due to its open nature. ### Is mcp-trust-plane or casdoor more popular on GitHub? casdoor has more GitHub stars (14,221 vs 99). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints. ### Are mcp-trust-plane and casdoor open source? Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (mcp-trust-plane: Apache-2.0, casdoor: Apache-2.0). ### Where can I find alternatives to mcp-trust-plane or casdoor? GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [mcp-trust-plane alternatives](/tools/abluva-research-mcp-trust-plane/alternatives) and [casdoor alternatives](/tools/casdoor-casdoor/alternatives) ([mcp-trust-plane markdown twin](/tools/abluva-research-mcp-trust-plane/alternatives.md), [casdoor markdown twin](/tools/casdoor-casdoor/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes. ### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison? Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/abluva-research-mcp-trust-plane-vs-casdoor-casdoor.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers. ### Which is better maintained, mcp-trust-plane or casdoor? mcp-trust-plane: Steady. casdoor: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance. ### Where are the full trust reports for mcp-trust-plane and casdoor? GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [mcp-trust-plane trust report](/tools/abluva-research-mcp-trust-plane/trust); [casdoor trust report](/tools/casdoor-casdoor/trust). --- **Machine-readable endpoints** - JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=abluva-research-mcp-trust-plane`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=abluva-research-mcp-trust-plane) - LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt) - Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt) _GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_