---
title: "agenta vs LLMStack"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/agenta-ai-agenta-vs-trypromptly-llmstack"
tools: ["agenta-ai-agenta", "trypromptly-llmstack"]
---

# agenta vs LLMStack

*GraphCanon updated Aug 16, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick agenta if agenta, an open-source LLMOps platform for prompt management, evaluation, and observability; pick LLMStack if lLMStack is a no-code framework designed for building LLM Agents and complex workflows with data integration, suitable for teams that want to leverage AI without deep coding expertise.

[agenta](http://www.agenta.ai) reports 4.4k GitHub stars, 609 forks, and 270 open issues, last pushed Aug 7, 2026. [LLMStack](https://llmstack.trypromptly.com) has 2.3k stars, 347 forks, and 23 open issues, last pushed Dec 11, 2024. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [agenta's repository](https://github.com/Agenta-AI/agenta) and [LLMStack's repository](https://github.com/trypromptly/LLMStack).

| | [agenta](/tools/agenta-ai-agenta.md) | [LLMStack](/tools/trypromptly-llmstack.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | The open-source LLMOps platform for prompt management, evaluation, and observability. | No-code multi-agent framework to build LLM Agents, workflows and applications with your data |
| Stars | 4,445 | 2,309 |
| Forks | 609 | 347 |
| Open issues | 270 | 23 |
| Language | TypeScript | Python |
| Adopt for | Agenta, an open-source LLMOps platform for prompt management, evaluation, and observability. | LLMStack is a no-code framework designed for building LLM Agents and complex workflows with data integration, suitable for teams that want to leverage AI without deep coding expertise. |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | Other | Other |
| Categories | Evaluation & Observability, LLM Frameworks | AI Agents, LLM Frameworks |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [agenta](/tools/agenta-ai-agenta.md) | [LLMStack](/tools/trypromptly-llmstack.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maintenance | Very active (96%) | Dormant (18%) |
| Days since push | 0d | 612d |
| Open issues (now) | 270 | 23 |
| Stars delta | +170 (30d) | +2 (30d) |
| Open issues delta | +109 (30d) | -1 (30d) |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/agenta-ai-agenta/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/trypromptly-llmstack/trust.md) |

## Decision facts: agenta

- **Adopt for:** Agenta, an open-source LLMOps platform for prompt management, evaluation, and observability.

## Decision facts: LLMStack

- **Adopt for:** LLMStack is a no-code framework designed for building LLM Agents and complex workflows with data integration, suitable for teams that want to leverage AI without deep coding expertise.

## Choose when

### Choose agenta if…

- agenta is primarily TypeScript; LLMStack is Python.
- Tags unique to agenta: evaluation, llm-as-a-judge, llm-evaluation, llm-monitoring.
- Also covers Evaluation & Observability.
- Need a self-hosted solution with built-in prompt playground and LLM evaluation capabilities

### Choose LLMStack if…

- LLMStack is primarily Python; agenta is TypeScript.
- Tags unique to LLMStack: ai-agents-framework, generative-ai, llm-agents, llm-chain.
- Also covers AI Agents.
- Use LLMStack when you need a no-code solution to develop multi-agent systems based on large language models.

## When NOT to use agenta

- Looking for a service without the need to manage self-hosting setup
- Require real-time collaboration features that are not provided within this platform's scope

## When NOT to use LLMStack

- Avoid using LLMStack if your project necessitates heavy customization or fine-tuning at the coding level, as it may limit flexibility compared to code-based alternatives.
- Not recommended for teams with robust software engineering capabilities and a need for detailed control over underlying AI model architectures.

## Common questions

### What is the difference between agenta and LLMStack?

agenta: The open-source LLMOps platform for prompt management, evaluation, and observability.. LLMStack: No-code multi-agent framework to build LLM Agents, workflows and applications with your data. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose agenta over LLMStack?

Choose agenta over LLMStack when agenta is primarily TypeScript; LLMStack is Python; Tags unique to agenta: evaluation, llm-as-a-judge, llm-evaluation, llm-monitoring; Also covers Evaluation & Observability; Need a self-hosted solution with built-in prompt playground and LLM evaluation capabilities.

### When should I choose LLMStack over agenta?

Choose LLMStack over agenta when LLMStack is primarily Python; agenta is TypeScript; Tags unique to LLMStack: ai-agents-framework, generative-ai, llm-agents, llm-chain; Also covers AI Agents; Use LLMStack when you need a no-code solution to develop multi-agent systems based on large language models.

### When should I avoid agenta?

Looking for a service without the need to manage self-hosting setup Require real-time collaboration features that are not provided within this platform's scope

### When should I avoid LLMStack?

Avoid using LLMStack if your project necessitates heavy customization or fine-tuning at the coding level, as it may limit flexibility compared to code-based alternatives. Not recommended for teams with robust software engineering capabilities and a need for detailed control over underlying AI model architectures.

### Is agenta or LLMStack more popular on GitHub?

agenta has more GitHub stars (4,445 vs 2,309). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are agenta and LLMStack open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (agenta: Other, LLMStack: Other).

### Where can I find alternatives to agenta or LLMStack?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [agenta alternatives](/tools/agenta-ai-agenta/alternatives) and [LLMStack alternatives](/tools/trypromptly-llmstack/alternatives) ([agenta markdown twin](/tools/agenta-ai-agenta/alternatives.md), [LLMStack markdown twin](/tools/trypromptly-llmstack/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/agenta-ai-agenta-vs-trypromptly-llmstack.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, agenta or LLMStack?

agenta: Very active. LLMStack: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for agenta and LLMStack?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [agenta trust report](/tools/agenta-ai-agenta/trust); [LLMStack trust report](/tools/trypromptly-llmstack/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=agenta-ai-agenta`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=agenta-ai-agenta)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
