---
title: "agentops vs agentdojo"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/agentops-ai-agentops-vs-ethz-spylab-agentdojo"
tools: ["agentops-ai-agentops", "ethz-spylab-agentdojo"]
---

# agentops vs agentdojo

*GraphCanon updated Aug 14, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick agentops if agentOps is an open-source Python toolkit for monitoring AI agents and tracking costs associated with Large Language Model usage; pick agentdojo if agentDojo serves as a benchmarking environment to evaluate security attacks, like prompt injection, and defenses for Large Language Model (LLM) agents.

[agentops](https://agentops.ai) reports 5.8k GitHub stars, 612 forks, and 176 open issues, last pushed Jun 25, 2026. [agentdojo](https://agentdojo.spylab.ai/) has 716 stars, 188 forks, and 41 open issues, last pushed Jun 2, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [agentops's repository](https://github.com/AgentOps-AI/agentops) and [agentdojo's repository](https://github.com/ethz-spylab/agentdojo).

| | [agentops](/tools/agentops-ai-agentops.md) | [agentdojo](/tools/ethz-spylab-agentdojo.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | Python SDK for AI agent monitoring and LLM cost tracking | A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM Agents |
| Stars | 5,771 | 716 |
| Forks | 612 | 188 |
| Open issues | 176 | 41 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Adopt for | AgentOps is an open-source Python toolkit for monitoring AI agents and tracking costs associated with Large Language Model usage. | AgentDojo serves as a benchmarking environment to evaluate security attacks, like prompt injection, and defenses for Large Language Model (LLM) agents. |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Categories | AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability | AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [agentops](/tools/agentops-ai-agentops.md) | [agentdojo](/tools/ethz-spylab-agentdojo.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Days since push | 49d | 63d |
| Open issues (now) | 176 | 41 |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/agentops-ai-agentops/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/ethz-spylab-agentdojo/trust.md) |

## Shared compatibility

- **Python**: [agentops](/tools/agentops-ai-agentops.md) - Python runtime; [agentdojo](/tools/ethz-spylab-agentdojo.md) - Python runtime

## Decision facts: agentops

- **Adopt for:** AgentOps is an open-source Python toolkit for monitoring AI agents and tracking costs associated with Large Language Model usage.

## Decision facts: agentdojo

- **Pricing:** freemium - Open-source under the MIT License. Some advanced features might require additional libraries or APIs.
- **Requirements:** Min 8 GB RAM
- **Adopt for:** AgentDojo serves as a benchmarking environment to evaluate security attacks, like prompt injection, and defenses for Large Language Model (LLM) agents.

## Choose when

### Choose agentops if…

- Tags unique to agentops: ai-agents, benchmarking, cost-tracking.
- Integrations are needed specifically with Langchain, CrewAI, or OpenAI Agents SDK
- More GitHub stars (5.8k vs 716) - visibility, not fit.

### Choose agentdojo if…

- Pricing: Open-source under the MIT License. Some advanced features might require additional libraries or APIs..
- Requirements: Min 8 GB RAM.
- Tags unique to agentdojo: benchmark, large language models, prompt-injection, security.
- AgentDojo serves as a benchmarking environment to evaluate security attacks, like prompt injection, and defenses for Large Language Model (LLM) agents.

## When NOT to use agentops

- If specific integration support is needed for frameworks not listed including Autogen AG2 CamelAI
- In case self-hosting of components is impractical due to resource constraints

## When NOT to use agentdojo

- AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
- Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers.

## Common questions

### What is the difference between agentops and agentdojo?

agentops: Python SDK for AI agent monitoring and LLM cost tracking. agentdojo: A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM Agents. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose agentops over agentdojo?

Choose agentops over agentdojo when Tags unique to agentops: ai-agents, benchmarking, cost-tracking; Integrations are needed specifically with Langchain, CrewAI, or OpenAI Agents SDK; More GitHub stars (5.8k vs 716) - visibility, not fit.

### When should I choose agentdojo over agentops?

Choose agentdojo over agentops when Pricing: Open-source under the MIT License. Some advanced features might require additional libraries or APIs.; Requirements: Min 8 GB RAM; Tags unique to agentdojo: benchmark, large language models, prompt-injection, security; AgentDojo serves as a benchmarking environment to evaluate security attacks, like prompt injection, and defenses for Large Language Model (LLM) agents.

### When should I avoid agentops?

If specific integration support is needed for frameworks not listed including Autogen AG2 CamelAI In case self-hosting of components is impractical due to resource constraints

### When should I avoid agentdojo?

AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers.

### Is agentops or agentdojo more popular on GitHub?

agentops has more GitHub stars (5,771 vs 716). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are agentops and agentdojo open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (agentops: MIT, agentdojo: MIT).

### Where can I find alternatives to agentops or agentdojo?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [agentops alternatives](/tools/agentops-ai-agentops/alternatives) and [agentdojo alternatives](/tools/ethz-spylab-agentdojo/alternatives) ([agentops markdown twin](/tools/agentops-ai-agentops/alternatives.md), [agentdojo markdown twin](/tools/ethz-spylab-agentdojo/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/agentops-ai-agentops-vs-ethz-spylab-agentdojo.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, agentops or agentdojo?

agentops: Steady. agentdojo: Steady. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for agentops and agentdojo?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [agentops trust report](/tools/agentops-ai-agentops/trust); [agentdojo trust report](/tools/ethz-spylab-agentdojo/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=agentops-ai-agentops`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=agentops-ai-agentops)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
