--- title: "FEDOT vs AutoGPT" type: "comparison" canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/aimclub-fedot-vs-significant-gravitas-autogpt" tools: ["aimclub-fedot", "significant-gravitas-autogpt"] --- # FEDOT vs AutoGPT *GraphCanon updated Jul 11, 2026* ## Verdict Pick FEDOT when license: FEDOT is BSD-3-Clause, AutoGPT is Other; pick AutoGPT when license: AutoGPT is Other, FEDOT is BSD-3-Clause. [FEDOT](https://fedot.readthedocs.io) reports 709 GitHub stars, 92 forks, and 83 open issues, last pushed Jul 8, 2026. [AutoGPT](https://agpt.co) has 185k stars, 46k forks, and 494 open issues, last pushed Jul 11, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [FEDOT's repository](https://github.com/aimclub/FEDOT) and [AutoGPT's repository](https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT). | | [FEDOT](/tools/aimclub-fedot.md) | [AutoGPT](/tools/significant-gravitas-autogpt.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Tagline | Automated modeling and machine learning framework FEDOT | AutoGPT is the vision of accessible AI for everyone, to use and to build on. | | Stars | 709 | 185,464 | | Forks | 92 | 46,111 | | Open issues | 83 | 494 | | Language | Python | Python | | Adopt for | - | AutoGPT is a Python-based tool for creating accessible autonomous AI agents that can leverage various LLM APIs including OpenAI's GPT and Anthropic's Claude. | | Persona | - | - | | Runtime | - | - | | License | BSD-3-Clause | Other | | Categories | LLM Frameworks, Data & Retrieval, Computer Vision | LLM Frameworks, AI Agents | ## Trust and health _Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._ | | [FEDOT](/tools/aimclub-fedot.md) | [AutoGPT](/tools/significant-gravitas-autogpt.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Days since push | 3d | 0d | | Open issues (now) | 83 | 494 | | Security scan | 27 low (27 low) | No lockfile | | Full report | [trust report](/tools/aimclub-fedot/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/significant-gravitas-autogpt/trust.md) | ## Decision facts: AutoGPT - **Adopt for:** AutoGPT is a Python-based tool for creating accessible autonomous AI agents that can leverage various LLM APIs including OpenAI's GPT and Anthropic's Claude. ## Choose when ### Choose FEDOT if… - License: FEDOT is BSD-3-Clause, AutoGPT is Other. - Tags unique to FEDOT: automl, evolutionary-algorithms, genetic-programming, machine-learning. - Also covers Data & Retrieval, Computer Vision. ### Choose AutoGPT if… - License: AutoGPT is Other, FEDOT is BSD-3-Clause. - Tags unique to AutoGPT: agents, llm, ai, artificial-intelligence. - Also covers AI Agents. - When you need to rapidly prototype or deploy an autonomous agent using existing language models without deep AI expertise. ## When NOT to use FEDOT - LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. - Data & Retrieval: Skip a heavy ingestion framework when your corpus is small and static; a script plus the embedding API is enough. ## When NOT to use AutoGPT - Avoid if you require absolute control over the underlying AI infrastructure and APIs used by your autonomous agents, as AutoGPT imposes its own framework. - If your project demands proprietary or specialized models that aren't supported by AutoGPT's API ecosystem (e.g., custom TensorFlow or PyTorch models), consider other tools. ## Common questions ### What is the difference between FEDOT and AutoGPT? FEDOT: Automated modeling and machine learning framework FEDOT. AutoGPT: AutoGPT is the vision of accessible AI for everyone, to use and to build on.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories. ### When should I choose FEDOT over AutoGPT? Choose FEDOT over AutoGPT when License: FEDOT is BSD-3-Clause, AutoGPT is Other; Tags unique to FEDOT: automl, evolutionary-algorithms, genetic-programming, machine-learning; Also covers Data & Retrieval, Computer Vision. ### When should I choose AutoGPT over FEDOT? Choose AutoGPT over FEDOT when License: AutoGPT is Other, FEDOT is BSD-3-Clause; Tags unique to AutoGPT: agents, llm, ai, artificial-intelligence; Also covers AI Agents; When you need to rapidly prototype or deploy an autonomous agent using existing language models without deep AI expertise. ### When should I avoid FEDOT? LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Data & Retrieval: Skip a heavy ingestion framework when your corpus is small and static; a script plus the embedding API is enough. ### When should I avoid AutoGPT? Avoid if you require absolute control over the underlying AI infrastructure and APIs used by your autonomous agents, as AutoGPT imposes its own framework. If your project demands proprietary or specialized models that aren't supported by AutoGPT's API ecosystem (e.g., custom TensorFlow or PyTorch models), consider other tools. ### Is FEDOT or AutoGPT more popular on GitHub? AutoGPT has more GitHub stars (185,464 vs 709). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints. ### Are FEDOT and AutoGPT open source? Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (FEDOT: BSD-3-Clause, AutoGPT: Other). ### Where can I find alternatives to FEDOT or AutoGPT? GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [FEDOT alternatives](/tools/aimclub-fedot/alternatives) and [AutoGPT alternatives](/tools/significant-gravitas-autogpt/alternatives) ([FEDOT markdown twin](/tools/aimclub-fedot/alternatives.md), [AutoGPT markdown twin](/tools/significant-gravitas-autogpt/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes. ### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison? Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/aimclub-fedot-vs-significant-gravitas-autogpt.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers. ### Which is better maintained, FEDOT or AutoGPT? FEDOT: Very active. AutoGPT: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance. ### Where are the full trust reports for FEDOT and AutoGPT? GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [FEDOT trust report](/tools/aimclub-fedot/trust); [AutoGPT trust report](/tools/significant-gravitas-autogpt/trust). --- **Machine-readable endpoints** - JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=aimclub-fedot`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=aimclub-fedot) - LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt) - Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt) _GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_