--- title: "open-code-review vs kereva-scanner" type: "comparison" canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/alibaba-open-code-review-vs-kereva-dev-kereva-scanner" tools: ["alibaba-open-code-review", "kereva-dev-kereva-scanner"] --- # open-code-review vs kereva-scanner *GraphCanon updated Sep 20, 2026* ## Verdict Pick open-code-review if open-code-review is a hybrid architecture code review tool using deterministic pipelines and an LLM Agent to provide detailed feedback, including specific security rule checks; pick kereva-scanner if kereva-scanner is a specialized code scanner that assesses AI prompts and interactions with language models for potential security vulnerabilities and performance inefficiencies. [open-code-review](https://open-codereview.ai) reports 21k GitHub stars, 1.5k forks, and 126 open issues, last pushed Aug 19, 2026. [kereva-scanner](https://kereva.io) has 78 stars, 8 forks, and 3 open issues, last pushed Apr 6, 2025. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [open-code-review's repository](https://github.com/alibaba/open-code-review) and [kereva-scanner's repository](https://github.com/kereva-dev/kereva-scanner). | | [open-code-review](/tools/alibaba-open-code-review.md) | [kereva-scanner](/tools/kereva-dev-kereva-scanner.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Tagline | Hybrid architecture code review tool with LLM Agent for precise line-level comments and built-in security rule checks. | Code scanner to check for issues in prompts and LLM calls | | Stars | 20,812 | 78 | | Forks | 1,482 | 8 | | Open issues | 126 | 3 | | Language | Go | Python | | Adopt for | open-code-review is a hybrid architecture code review tool using deterministic pipelines and an LLM Agent to provide detailed feedback, including specific security rule checks. | kereva-scanner is a specialized code scanner that assesses AI prompts and interactions with language models for potential security vulnerabilities and performance inefficiencies. | | Persona | - | - | | Runtime | - | - | | License | Apache-2.0 license, providing a balance between permissive usage and explicit patent grants. | Apache-2.0 | | Categories | Developer Tools, LLM Frameworks | Developer Tools, Evaluation & Observability | ## Trust and health _Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._ | | [open-code-review](/tools/alibaba-open-code-review.md) | [kereva-scanner](/tools/kereva-dev-kereva-scanner.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Maintenance | Very active (96%) | Dormant (18%) | | Days since push | 0d | 520d | | Open issues (now) | 126 | 3 | | Stars delta | +10k (30d) | 0 (30d) | | Open issues delta | +89 (30d) | 0 (30d) | | Full report | [trust report](/tools/alibaba-open-code-review/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/kereva-dev-kereva-scanner/trust.md) | ## Decision facts: open-code-review - **Pricing:** freemium - The tool is open-source and free. - **Adopt for:** open-code-review is a hybrid architecture code review tool using deterministic pipelines and an LLM Agent to provide detailed feedback, including specific security rule checks. - **License detail:** Apache-2.0 license, providing a balance between permissive usage and explicit patent grants. ## Decision facts: kereva-scanner - **Pricing:** freemium - The tool is free under the Apache-2.0 license but may have features in a paid version not detailed in the repository. - **Requirements:** - **Adopt for:** kereva-scanner is a specialized code scanner that assesses AI prompts and interactions with language models for potential security vulnerabilities and performance inefficiencies. ## Choose when ### Choose open-code-review if… - open-code-review is primarily Go; kereva-scanner is Python. - Pricing: The tool is open-source and free.. - Tags unique to open-code-review: agent-skills, code-review-assistant, repository-level-context. - Also covers LLM Frameworks. - When leveraging the capabilities of a large language model (LLM) agent for precise line-level commenting and rule enforcement, especially if you are familiar with or prefer Go in your tech stack. ### Choose kereva-scanner if… - kereva-scanner is primarily Python; open-code-review is Go. - Pricing: The tool is free under the Apache-2.0 license but may have features in a paid version not detailed in the repository.. - Requirements: . - Tags unique to kereva-scanner: ai-code-review, hallucination, llm-evaluation, llm-security. - Also covers Evaluation & Observability. - When you are developing applications involving AI-generated content or integrations with large language models, to ensure your prompts are secure against attacks such as prompt injection. ## When NOT to use open-code-review - For development teams looking for a tool that offers real-time suggestions beyond line-level comments since open-code-review focuses on deterministic pipeline assessments and LLM-generated feedback at - sync events. - When specific integration with frameworks or languages not supported by this tool is crucial, such as those needing more Python-centric integrations which might not align well with its Go-based core. ## When NOT to use kereva-scanner - When your project does not involve interactions with language models or AI-generated content, since the scanner's utility is primarily in evaluating AI-related issues. - If you are looking for a comprehensive general code linter that checks for coding standard violations or general best practices unrelated to security and performance of LLMs. ## Common questions ### What is the difference between open-code-review and kereva-scanner? open-code-review: Hybrid architecture code review tool with LLM Agent for precise line-level comments and built-in security rule checks.. kereva-scanner: Code scanner to check for issues in prompts and LLM calls. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories. ### When should I choose open-code-review over kereva-scanner? Choose open-code-review over kereva-scanner when open-code-review is primarily Go; kereva-scanner is Python; Pricing: The tool is open-source and free.; Tags unique to open-code-review: agent-skills, code-review-assistant, repository-level-context; Also covers LLM Frameworks; When leveraging the capabilities of a large language model (LLM) agent for precise line-level commenting and rule enforcement, especially if you are familiar with or prefer Go in your tech stack. ### When should I choose kereva-scanner over open-code-review? Choose kereva-scanner over open-code-review when kereva-scanner is primarily Python; open-code-review is Go; Pricing: The tool is free under the Apache-2.0 license but may have features in a paid version not detailed in the repository.; Requirements: ; Tags unique to kereva-scanner: ai-code-review, hallucination, llm-evaluation, llm-security; Also covers Evaluation & Observability; When you are developing applications involving AI-generated content or integrations with large language models, to ensure your prompts are secure against attacks such as prompt injection. ### When should I avoid open-code-review? For development teams looking for a tool that offers real-time suggestions beyond line-level comments since open-code-review focuses on deterministic pipeline assessments and LLM-generated feedback at sync events. When specific integration with frameworks or languages not supported by this tool is crucial, such as those needing more Python-centric integrations which might not align well with its Go-based core. ### When should I avoid kereva-scanner? When your project does not involve interactions with language models or AI-generated content, since the scanner's utility is primarily in evaluating AI-related issues. If you are looking for a comprehensive general code linter that checks for coding standard violations or general best practices unrelated to security and performance of LLMs. ### Is open-code-review or kereva-scanner more popular on GitHub? open-code-review has more GitHub stars (20,812 vs 78). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints. ### Are open-code-review and kereva-scanner open source? Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (open-code-review: Apache-2.0, kereva-scanner: Apache-2.0). ### Where can I find alternatives to open-code-review or kereva-scanner? GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [open-code-review alternatives](/tools/alibaba-open-code-review/alternatives) and [kereva-scanner alternatives](/tools/kereva-dev-kereva-scanner/alternatives) ([open-code-review markdown twin](/tools/alibaba-open-code-review/alternatives.md), [kereva-scanner markdown twin](/tools/kereva-dev-kereva-scanner/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes. ### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison? Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/alibaba-open-code-review-vs-kereva-dev-kereva-scanner.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers. ### Which is better maintained, open-code-review or kereva-scanner? open-code-review: Very active. kereva-scanner: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance. ### Where are the full trust reports for open-code-review and kereva-scanner? GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [open-code-review trust report](/tools/alibaba-open-code-review/trust); [kereva-scanner trust report](/tools/kereva-dev-kereva-scanner/trust). --- **Machine-readable endpoints** - JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=alibaba-open-code-review`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=alibaba-open-code-review) - LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt) - Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt) _GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_