---
title: "athina-evals vs human-eval"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/athina-ai-athina-evals-vs-openai-human-eval"
tools: ["athina-ai-athina-evals", "openai-human-eval"]
---

# athina-evals vs human-eval

*GraphCanon updated Aug 5, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick athina-evals if athina-evals is a Python SDK developed for facilitating the evaluation of outputs from large language models through predefined metrics and frameworks; pick human-eval if human-eval is a tool designed for evaluating large language models trained specifically on code through human-written tests.

[athina-evals](https://docs.athina.ai) reports 301 GitHub stars, 22 forks, and 3 open issues, last pushed Jun 6, 2025. [human-eval](https://github.com/openai/human-eval) has 3.3k stars, 452 forks, and 44 open issues, last pushed Jan 17, 2025. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [athina-evals's repository](https://github.com/athina-ai/athina-evals) and [human-eval's repository](https://github.com/openai/human-eval).

| | [athina-evals](/tools/athina-ai-athina-evals.md) | [human-eval](/tools/openai-human-eval.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | Python SDK for evaluating LLM generated responses | Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code |
| Stars | 301 | 3,331 |
| Forks | 22 | 452 |
| Open issues | 3 | 44 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Adopt for | athina-evals is a Python SDK developed for facilitating the evaluation of outputs from large language models through predefined metrics and frameworks. | human-eval is a tool designed for evaluating large language models trained specifically on code through human-written tests. |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | - | MIT |
| Categories | Evaluation & Observability | Evaluation & Observability |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [athina-evals](/tools/athina-ai-athina-evals.md) | [human-eval](/tools/openai-human-eval.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Days since push | 417d | 564d |
| Open issues (now) | 3 | 44 |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/athina-ai-athina-evals/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/openai-human-eval/trust.md) |

## Decision facts: athina-evals

- **Adopt for:** athina-evals is a Python SDK developed for facilitating the evaluation of outputs from large language models through predefined metrics and frameworks.

## Decision facts: human-eval

- **Hosting:** self hosted - This evaluation framework must be installed and set up in your own environment, ensuring full control over the testing process.
- **Pricing:** freemium - The software is available under an MIT license for free use, yet advanced features or services beyond its core functionality might incur costs.
- **Adopt for:** human-eval is a tool designed for evaluating large language models trained specifically on code through human-written tests.

## Choose when

### Choose athina-evals if…

- Tags unique to athina-evals: evaluation, evaluation-framework, evaluation-metrics, llm-eval.
- When comprehensive evaluation of LLM responses is required, leveraging athina's specific tools and metrics
- More recently updated (last pushed Jun 6, 2025).

### Choose human-eval if…

- This evaluation framework must be installed and set up in your own environment, ensuring full control over the testing process.
- Pricing: The software is available under an MIT license for free use, yet advanced features or services beyond its core functionality might incur costs..
- Tags unique to human-eval: code evaluation, large language models, python.
- When you need to evaluate the performance of AI systems that have been trained exclusively on code datasets, as it allows testing via human-created benchmarks relevant only to code-based models.

## When NOT to use athina-evals

- If open-source alternatives with transparent customization options are preferred over athina-evals' approach
- In scenarios where API access requirements limit the ability to perform evaluations offline or in private environments

## When NOT to use human-eval

- If you are interested in evaluating general natural language processing tasks without coding context, as human-eval is tailored specifically for assessing code-focused AI systems.
- When the required Python version is below 3.7; this tool mandates at least Python 3.7 to ensure compatibility with its dependencies.

## Common questions

### What is the difference between athina-evals and human-eval?

athina-evals: Python SDK for evaluating LLM generated responses. human-eval: Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose athina-evals over human-eval?

Choose athina-evals over human-eval when Tags unique to athina-evals: evaluation, evaluation-framework, evaluation-metrics, llm-eval; When comprehensive evaluation of LLM responses is required, leveraging athina's specific tools and metrics; More recently updated (last pushed Jun 6, 2025).

### When should I choose human-eval over athina-evals?

Choose human-eval over athina-evals when This evaluation framework must be installed and set up in your own environment, ensuring full control over the testing process; Pricing: The software is available under an MIT license for free use, yet advanced features or services beyond its core functionality might incur costs.; Tags unique to human-eval: code evaluation, large language models, python; When you need to evaluate the performance of AI systems that have been trained exclusively on code datasets, as it allows testing via human-created benchmarks relevant only to code-based models.

### When should I avoid athina-evals?

If open-source alternatives with transparent customization options are preferred over athina-evals' approach In scenarios where API access requirements limit the ability to perform evaluations offline or in private environments

### When should I avoid human-eval?

If you are interested in evaluating general natural language processing tasks without coding context, as human-eval is tailored specifically for assessing code-focused AI systems. When the required Python version is below 3.7; this tool mandates at least Python 3.7 to ensure compatibility with its dependencies.

### Is athina-evals or human-eval more popular on GitHub?

human-eval has more GitHub stars (3,331 vs 301). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are athina-evals and human-eval open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub.

### Where can I find alternatives to athina-evals or human-eval?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [athina-evals alternatives](/tools/athina-ai-athina-evals/alternatives) and [human-eval alternatives](/tools/openai-human-eval/alternatives) ([athina-evals markdown twin](/tools/athina-ai-athina-evals/alternatives.md), [human-eval markdown twin](/tools/openai-human-eval/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/athina-ai-athina-evals-vs-openai-human-eval.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, athina-evals or human-eval?

athina-evals: Dormant. human-eval: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for athina-evals and human-eval?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [athina-evals trust report](/tools/athina-ai-athina-evals/trust); [human-eval trust report](/tools/openai-human-eval/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=athina-ai-athina-evals`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=athina-ai-athina-evals)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
