---
title: "automa vs agentic-signal"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/automaapp-automa-vs-code-forge-temple-agentic-signal"
tools: ["automaapp-automa", "code-forge-temple-agentic-signal"]
---

# automa vs agentic-signal

*GraphCanon updated Sep 20, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick automa if automa is known for its ease of implementation and browser agnostic design enabling users to streamline tasks on multiple platforms; pick agentic-signal if agentic-Signal is a visual AI agent workflow automation tool that emphasizes local LLM integration and no-code building capabilities.

[automa](https://www.goautoma.com/extension) reports 22k GitHub stars, 2.3k forks, and 377 open issues, last pushed Mar 2, 2026. [agentic-signal](https://agentic-signal.com) has 177 stars, 18 forks, and 0 open issues, last pushed Sep 13, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [automa's repository](https://github.com/AutomaApp/automa) and [agentic-signal's repository](https://github.com/code-forge-temple/agentic-signal).

| | [automa](/tools/automaapp-automa.md) | [agentic-signal](/tools/code-forge-temple-agentic-signal.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | A browser extension for automating your browser by connecting blocks | Visual AI agent workflow automation platform with local LLM integration |
| Stars | 21,619 | 177 |
| Forks | 2,341 | 18 |
| Open issues | 377 | 0 |
| Language | Vue | TypeScript |
| Adopt for | Automa is known for its ease of implementation and browser agnostic design enabling users to streamline tasks on multiple platforms. | Agentic-Signal is a visual AI agent workflow automation tool that emphasizes local LLM integration and no-code building capabilities. |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | Other | Other |
| Categories | Developer Tools | AI Agents, Developer Tools |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [automa](/tools/automaapp-automa.md) | [agentic-signal](/tools/code-forge-temple-agentic-signal.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maintenance | Slowing (36%) | Very active (96%) |
| Days since push | 195d | 6d |
| Open issues (now) | 377 | 0 |
| Stars delta | +73 (30d) | +15 (30d) |
| Open issues delta | +5 (30d) | -3 (30d) |
| Owner type | Organization | User |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/automaapp-automa/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/code-forge-temple-agentic-signal/trust.md) |

## Decision facts: automa

- **Adopt for:** Automa is known for its ease of implementation and browser agnostic design enabling users to streamline tasks on multiple platforms.

## Decision facts: agentic-signal

- **Adopt for:** Agentic-Signal is a visual AI agent workflow automation tool that emphasizes local LLM integration and no-code building capabilities.

## Choose when

### Choose automa if…

- automa is primarily Vue; agentic-signal is TypeScript.
- Tags unique to automa: automation, browser-automation, chrome-extension, firefox-extension.
- If you are working with Chrome or Firefox browsers and require the capability to interconnect blocks to automate repetitive, browser-based actions.

### Choose agentic-signal if…

- agentic-signal is primarily TypeScript; automa is Vue.
- Tags unique to agentic-signal: ai-agents, ai-automation, fortheloveofcode, gemma.
- Also covers AI Agents.
- - If you need to build intelligent workflows locally without dependence on cloud services for privacy or compliance reasons.

## When NOT to use automa

- When specific automation tasks demand customization via coding rather than block connectivity since Automa is more suited for visual scripting.
- If your project involves non-browser-based workflows, as Automa's functionality is limited to browser extensions like Chrome and Firefox.

## When NOT to use agentic-signal

- - Avoid if you require extensive cloud-based features or seamless integration with cloud-dependent AI services.
- - Not suitable when looking for a tool that prioritizes flexibility in cloud deployment over local computational resources.

## Common questions

### What is the difference between automa and agentic-signal?

automa: A browser extension for automating your browser by connecting blocks. agentic-signal: Visual AI agent workflow automation platform with local LLM integration. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose automa over agentic-signal?

Choose automa over agentic-signal when automa is primarily Vue; agentic-signal is TypeScript; Tags unique to automa: automation, browser-automation, chrome-extension, firefox-extension; If you are working with Chrome or Firefox browsers and require the capability to interconnect blocks to automate repetitive, browser-based actions.

### When should I choose agentic-signal over automa?

Choose agentic-signal over automa when agentic-signal is primarily TypeScript; automa is Vue; Tags unique to agentic-signal: ai-agents, ai-automation, fortheloveofcode, gemma; Also covers AI Agents; - If you need to build intelligent workflows locally without dependence on cloud services for privacy or compliance reasons.

### When should I avoid automa?

When specific automation tasks demand customization via coding rather than block connectivity since Automa is more suited for visual scripting. If your project involves non-browser-based workflows, as Automa's functionality is limited to browser extensions like Chrome and Firefox.

### When should I avoid agentic-signal?

- Avoid if you require extensive cloud-based features or seamless integration with cloud-dependent AI services. - Not suitable when looking for a tool that prioritizes flexibility in cloud deployment over local computational resources.

### Is automa or agentic-signal more popular on GitHub?

automa has more GitHub stars (21,619 vs 177). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are automa and agentic-signal open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (automa: Other, agentic-signal: Other).

### Where can I find alternatives to automa or agentic-signal?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [automa alternatives](/tools/automaapp-automa/alternatives) and [agentic-signal alternatives](/tools/code-forge-temple-agentic-signal/alternatives) ([automa markdown twin](/tools/automaapp-automa/alternatives.md), [agentic-signal markdown twin](/tools/code-forge-temple-agentic-signal/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/automaapp-automa-vs-code-forge-temple-agentic-signal.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, automa or agentic-signal?

automa: Slowing. agentic-signal: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for automa and agentic-signal?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [automa trust report](/tools/automaapp-automa/trust); [agentic-signal trust report](/tools/code-forge-temple-agentic-signal/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=automaapp-automa`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=automaapp-automa)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
