---
title: "automatisch vs loonflow"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/automatisch-automatisch-vs-blackholll-loonflow"
tools: ["automatisch-automatisch", "blackholll-loonflow"]
---

# automatisch vs loonflow

*GraphCanon updated Sep 20, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick automatisch if automatisch serves as an open-source alternative to Zapier for those seeking a community-supported approach with the option to upgrade to enterprise-grade features without leaving the same vendor ecosystem; pick loonflow if loonflow is an intelligent and visual process automation system that supports ticketing systems and MCP through workflow management capabilities. It operates with TypeScript under the AGPL-3.0.

[automatisch](https://automatisch.io) reports 14k GitHub stars, 1.1k forks, and 287 open issues, last pushed Feb 11, 2026. [loonflow](https://github.com/blackholll/loonflow) has 2.1k stars, 705 forks, and 19 open issues, last pushed May 25, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [automatisch's repository](https://github.com/automatisch/automatisch) and [loonflow's repository](https://github.com/blackholll/loonflow).

| | [automatisch](/tools/automatisch-automatisch.md) | [loonflow](/tools/blackholll-loonflow.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | The open source Zapier alternative for building workflow automation without spending time and money | An intelligent and visual process automation system. |
| Stars | 13,966 | 2,089 |
| Forks | 1,059 | 705 |
| Open issues | 287 | 19 |
| Language | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Adopt for | Automatisch serves as an open-source alternative to Zapier for those seeking a community-supported approach with the option to upgrade to enterprise-grade features without leaving the same vendor ecosystem. | Loonflow is an intelligent and visual process automation system that supports ticketing systems and MCP through workflow management capabilities. It operates with TypeScript under the AGPL-3.0 license. |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Categories | Developer Tools | Developer Tools |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [automatisch](/tools/automatisch-automatisch.md) | [loonflow](/tools/blackholll-loonflow.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Days since push | 214d | 114d |
| Open issues (now) | 287 | 19 |
| Stars delta | +40 (30d) | 0 (30d) |
| Open issues delta | +1 (30d) | -1 (30d) |
| Owner type | Organization | User |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/automatisch-automatisch/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/blackholll-loonflow/trust.md) |

## Decision facts: automatisch

- **Adopt for:** Automatisch serves as an open-source alternative to Zapier for those seeking a community-supported approach with the option to upgrade to enterprise-grade features without leaving the same vendor ecosystem.

## Decision facts: loonflow

- **Adopt for:** Loonflow is an intelligent and visual process automation system that supports ticketing systems and MCP through workflow management capabilities. It operates with TypeScript under the AGPL-3.0 license.

## Choose when

### Choose automatisch if…

- automatisch is primarily JavaScript; loonflow is TypeScript.
- License: automatisch is Other, loonflow is AGPL-3.0.
- Tags unique to automatisch: automation, low-code, no-code, open-source.
- automatisch ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- Need self-hosted automation solutions

### Choose loonflow if…

- loonflow is primarily TypeScript; automatisch is JavaScript.
- License: loonflow is AGPL-3.0, automatisch is Other.
- Tags unique to loonflow: devops, django, mcp, python.
- You need a fully open-source solution for your internal process automation, as Loonflow requires you to share modifications if used in a SaaS service publically.

## When NOT to use automatisch

- Require proprietary software features absent in open-source models
- Averse to potentially less stable community-supported platform

## When NOT to use loonflow

- You seek closed-source solutions for proprietary reasons as Loonflow's AGPLv3 requirement mandates openness in SaaS settings.
- When deployment flexibility is essential since the tool relies on Docker for installation, which may not align with all IT environments.

## Common questions

### What is the difference between automatisch and loonflow?

automatisch: The open source Zapier alternative for building workflow automation without spending time and money. loonflow: An intelligent and visual process automation system.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose automatisch over loonflow?

Choose automatisch over loonflow when automatisch is primarily JavaScript; loonflow is TypeScript; License: automatisch is Other, loonflow is AGPL-3.0; Tags unique to automatisch: automation, low-code, no-code, open-source; automatisch ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; Need self-hosted automation solutions.

### When should I choose loonflow over automatisch?

Choose loonflow over automatisch when loonflow is primarily TypeScript; automatisch is JavaScript; License: loonflow is AGPL-3.0, automatisch is Other; Tags unique to loonflow: devops, django, mcp, python; You need a fully open-source solution for your internal process automation, as Loonflow requires you to share modifications if used in a SaaS service publically.

### When should I avoid automatisch?

Require proprietary software features absent in open-source models Averse to potentially less stable community-supported platform

### When should I avoid loonflow?

You seek closed-source solutions for proprietary reasons as Loonflow's AGPLv3 requirement mandates openness in SaaS settings. When deployment flexibility is essential since the tool relies on Docker for installation, which may not align with all IT environments.

### Is automatisch or loonflow more popular on GitHub?

automatisch has more GitHub stars (13,966 vs 2,089). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are automatisch and loonflow open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (automatisch: Other, loonflow: AGPL-3.0).

### Where can I find alternatives to automatisch or loonflow?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [automatisch alternatives](/tools/automatisch-automatisch/alternatives) and [loonflow alternatives](/tools/blackholll-loonflow/alternatives) ([automatisch markdown twin](/tools/automatisch-automatisch/alternatives.md), [loonflow markdown twin](/tools/blackholll-loonflow/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/automatisch-automatisch-vs-blackholll-loonflow.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, automatisch or loonflow?

automatisch: Slowing. loonflow: Slowing. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for automatisch and loonflow?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [automatisch trust report](/tools/automatisch-automatisch/trust); [loonflow trust report](/tools/blackholll-loonflow/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=automatisch-automatisch`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=automatisch-automatisch)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
