--- title: "litellm vs sarathi-serve" type: "comparison" canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/berriai-litellm-vs-microsoft-sarathi-serve" tools: ["berriai-litellm", "microsoft-sarathi-serve"] --- # litellm vs sarathi-serve *GraphCanon updated Jul 11, 2026* ## Verdict Pick litellm when license: litellm is Other, sarathi-serve is Apache-2.0; pick sarathi-serve when license: sarathi-serve is Apache-2.0, litellm is Other. [litellm](https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/) reports 53k GitHub stars, 9.7k forks, and 3.9k open issues, last pushed Jul 11, 2026. [sarathi-serve](https://github.com/microsoft/sarathi-serve) has 509 stars, 64 forks, and 16 open issues, last pushed Jan 8, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [litellm's repository](https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm) and [sarathi-serve's repository](https://github.com/microsoft/sarathi-serve). | | [litellm](/tools/berriai-litellm.md) | [sarathi-serve](/tools/microsoft-sarathi-serve.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Tagline | Python SDK and Proxy Server for calling multiple LLM APIs | A low-latency & high-throughput serving engine for LLMs | | Stars | 53,271 | 509 | | Forks | 9,671 | 64 | | Open issues | 3,915 | 16 | | Language | Python | Python | | Adopt for | litellm is a Python SDK and Proxy Server that facilitates the interaction with over 100 LLM APIs, offering features such as cost tracking, guardrails, load balancing, and logging. | - | | Persona | - | - | | Runtime | - | - | | License | The licensing terms for LiteLLM are provided under a license type categorized as 'Other'; details of the exact license should be referenced directly from its source. | Apache-2.0 | | Categories | Inference & Serving, LLM Frameworks | Inference & Serving, LLM Frameworks, Model Training | ## Trust and health _Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._ | | [litellm](/tools/berriai-litellm.md) | [sarathi-serve](/tools/microsoft-sarathi-serve.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Maintenance | Very active (96%) | Slowing (36%) | | Days since push | 0d | 184d | | Open issues (now) | 3.9k | 16 | | Security scan | 2 low (2 low) | No lockfile | | Full report | [trust report](/tools/berriai-litellm/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/microsoft-sarathi-serve/trust.md) | ## Decision facts: litellm - **Pricing:** freemium - While the core functionality is provided free, specific extended features might require a paid plan. - **Requirements:** Requires Docker - **Adopt for:** litellm is a Python SDK and Proxy Server that facilitates the interaction with over 100 LLM APIs, offering features such as cost tracking, guardrails, load balancing, and logging. - **License detail:** The licensing terms for LiteLLM are provided under a license type categorized as 'Other'; details of the exact license should be referenced directly from its source. ## Choose when ### Choose litellm if… - License: litellm is Other, sarathi-serve is Apache-2.0. - Pricing: While the core functionality is provided free, specific extended features might require a paid plan.. - Requirements: Requires Docker. - Tags unique to litellm: ai-gateway, azure-openai, bedrock, llm. - litellm ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment. - When you need to integrate multiple LLM (Language Learning Modelling) APIs into your application across different providers like Bedrock, Azure, OpenAI, VertexAI, Cohere, Anthropic, Sagemaker, Hugging ### Choose sarathi-serve if… - License: sarathi-serve is Apache-2.0, litellm is Other. - Tags unique to sarathi-serve: llama, llm-inference, python, pytorch. - Also covers Model Training. ## When NOT to use litellm - If your project only requires interaction with a single LLM API and basic functionalities, litellm may be overkill. ## When NOT to use sarathi-serve - Last GitHub push was 185 days ago (slowing maintenance, Jan 8, 2026). Validate activity before betting a new project on sarathi-serve. - Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic. - LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. - Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge. ## Common questions ### What is the difference between litellm and sarathi-serve? litellm: Python SDK and Proxy Server for calling multiple LLM APIs. sarathi-serve: A low-latency & high-throughput serving engine for LLMs. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories. ### When should I choose litellm over sarathi-serve? Choose litellm over sarathi-serve when License: litellm is Other, sarathi-serve is Apache-2.0; Pricing: While the core functionality is provided free, specific extended features might require a paid plan.; Requirements: Requires Docker; Tags unique to litellm: ai-gateway, azure-openai, bedrock, llm; litellm ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; When you need to integrate multiple LLM (Language Learning Modelling) APIs into your application across different providers like Bedrock, Azure, OpenAI, VertexAI, Cohere, Anthropic, Sagemaker, Hugging. ### When should I choose sarathi-serve over litellm? Choose sarathi-serve over litellm when License: sarathi-serve is Apache-2.0, litellm is Other; Tags unique to sarathi-serve: llama, llm-inference, python, pytorch; Also covers Model Training. ### When should I avoid litellm? If your project only requires interaction with a single LLM API and basic functionalities, litellm may be overkill. ### When should I avoid sarathi-serve? Last GitHub push was 185 days ago (slowing maintenance, Jan 8, 2026). Validate activity before betting a new project on sarathi-serve. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge. ### Is litellm or sarathi-serve more popular on GitHub? litellm has more GitHub stars (53,271 vs 509). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints. ### Are litellm and sarathi-serve open source? Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (litellm: Other, sarathi-serve: Apache-2.0). ### Where can I find alternatives to litellm or sarathi-serve? GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [litellm alternatives](/tools/berriai-litellm/alternatives) and [sarathi-serve alternatives](/tools/microsoft-sarathi-serve/alternatives) ([litellm markdown twin](/tools/berriai-litellm/alternatives.md), [sarathi-serve markdown twin](/tools/microsoft-sarathi-serve/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes. ### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison? Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/berriai-litellm-vs-microsoft-sarathi-serve.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers. ### Which is better maintained, litellm or sarathi-serve? litellm: Very active. sarathi-serve: Slowing. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance. ### Where are the full trust reports for litellm and sarathi-serve? GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [litellm trust report](/tools/berriai-litellm/trust); [sarathi-serve trust report](/tools/microsoft-sarathi-serve/trust). --- **Machine-readable endpoints** - JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=berriai-litellm`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=berriai-litellm) - LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt) - Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt) _GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_