---
title: "litellm vs gateway"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/berriai-litellm-vs-portkey-ai-gateway"
tools: ["berriai-litellm", "portkey-ai-gateway"]
---

# litellm vs gateway

Neutral, constraint-first comparison with live GitHub stats.

| | [litellm](/tools/berriai-litellm.md) | [gateway](/tools/portkey-ai-gateway.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | LiteLLM AI Gateway: Open Source AI Gateway for 100+ LLMs | A blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails |
| Stars | 52,933 | 12,354 |
| Forks | 9,554 | 1,185 |
| Open issues | 3,724 | 217 |
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| Adopt for | LiteLLM provides an open-source AI gateway for over 100 LLMs, integrating them via OpenAI format and offering features like cost tracking, guardrails, load balancing, and logging. | Portkey-AI/gateway is an open-source AI Gateway that provides fast, secure routing to over 1600 AI models with built-in guardrails for enhanced security and reliability. |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | The specific license details are categorized as 'Other', indicating it's neither a standard open-source license like MIT, Apache 2.0 nor GPL. It’s crucial to check the precise licensing terms directly | MIT |
| Categories | Inference & Serving | LLM Frameworks, Developer Tools |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [litellm](/tools/berriai-litellm.md) | [gateway](/tools/portkey-ai-gateway.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maintenance | Very active (96%) | Steady (60%) |
| Days since push | 0d | 43d |
| Open issues (now) | 3.7k | 217 |
| Security scan | 2 low (2 low) | No MCP manifest |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/berriai-litellm/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/portkey-ai-gateway/trust.md) |

**Typed relationship:** litellm _(integrates with)_ gateway

Gateway integrates with litellm as both are AI gateway solutions that route requests to various language models, though gateway supports a larger number of models (over 1600) compared to litellm's over 100. The integration could enable extended model support and feature complementarity between the two tools.

## Decision facts: litellm

- **Requirements:** Min 4 GB RAM; - Requires Python for installation and operation.; - Supports deployment as a standalone application or integrated into larger applications via library calls.
- **Adopt for:** LiteLLM provides an open-source AI gateway for over 100 LLMs, integrating them via OpenAI format and offering features like cost tracking, guardrails, load balancing, and logging.
- **License detail:** The specific license details are categorized as 'Other', indicating it's neither a standard open-source license like MIT, Apache 2.0 nor GPL. It’s crucial to check the precise licensing terms directly

## Decision facts: gateway

- **Adopt for:** Portkey-AI/gateway is an open-source AI Gateway that provides fast, secure routing to over 1600 AI models with built-in guardrails for enhanced security and reliability.

## Choose when

### Choose litellm if…

- litellm is primarily Python; gateway is TypeScript.
- License: litellm is Other, gateway is MIT.
- Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; - Requires Python for installation and operation.; - Supports deployment as a standalone application or integrated into larger applications via library calls..
- Gateway integrates with litellm as both are AI gateway solutions that route requests to various language models, though gateway supports a larger number of models (over 1600) compared to litellm's over 100. The integration could enable extended model support and feature complementarity between the two tools.
- Tags unique to litellm: llmops, rust, bedrock, anthropic.
- Also covers Inference & Serving.
- - You require a unified interface to integrate multiple LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Bedrock, Azure, etc.) using the OpenAI format.

### Choose gateway if…

- gateway is primarily TypeScript; litellm is Python.
- License: gateway is MIT, litellm is Other.
- Gateway integrates with litellm as both are AI gateway solutions that route requests to various language models, though gateway supports a larger number of models (over 1600) compared to litellm's over 100. The integration could enable extended model support and feature complementarity between the two tools.
- Tags unique to gateway: gateway, llm, generative-ai.
- Also covers LLM Frameworks, Developer Tools.
- When you need rapid integration of any language model in your application within a matter of minutes.

## When NOT to use litellm

- - If your application only needs to integrate with a single LLM provider that does not require the OpenAI standard interface.
- - Your project prioritizes proprietary or closed-source solutions; LiteLLM is open source and may lack some commercial support or enterprise-grade add-ons available in paid alternatives.

## When NOT to use gateway

- Avoid if your requirements are better served by lightweight frameworks that do not require advanced guardrails or extensive integration with multiple language models.
- If you specifically seek a service without integrated security features, opting for a more minimalist framework may be preferable.
- When needing to deploy in environments where TypeScript is less preferred compared to other languages like Python due to maintenance or team familiarity reasons.

## Common questions

### What is the difference between litellm and gateway?

litellm: LiteLLM AI Gateway: Open Source AI Gateway for 100+ LLMs. gateway: A blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose litellm over gateway?

Choose litellm over gateway when litellm is primarily Python; gateway is TypeScript; License: litellm is Other, gateway is MIT; Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; - Requires Python for installation and operation.; - Supports deployment as a standalone application or integrated into larger applications via library calls.; Gateway integrates with litellm as both are AI gateway solutions that route requests to various language models, though gateway supports a larger number of models (over 1600) compared to litellm's over 100. The integration could enable extended model support and feature complementarity between the two tools; Tags unique to litellm: llmops, rust, bedrock, anthropic; Also covers Inference & Serving; - You require a unified interface to integrate multiple LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Bedrock, Azure, etc.) using the OpenAI format.

### When should I choose gateway over litellm?

Choose gateway over litellm when gateway is primarily TypeScript; litellm is Python; License: gateway is MIT, litellm is Other; Gateway integrates with litellm as both are AI gateway solutions that route requests to various language models, though gateway supports a larger number of models (over 1600) compared to litellm's over 100. The integration could enable extended model support and feature complementarity between the two tools; Tags unique to gateway: gateway, llm, generative-ai; Also covers LLM Frameworks, Developer Tools; When you need rapid integration of any language model in your application within a matter of minutes.

### When should I avoid litellm?

- If your application only needs to integrate with a single LLM provider that does not require the OpenAI standard interface. - Your project prioritizes proprietary or closed-source solutions; LiteLLM is open source and may lack some commercial support or enterprise-grade add-ons available in paid alternatives.

### When should I avoid gateway?

Avoid if your requirements are better served by lightweight frameworks that do not require advanced guardrails or extensive integration with multiple language models. If you specifically seek a service without integrated security features, opting for a more minimalist framework may be preferable. When needing to deploy in environments where TypeScript is less preferred compared to other languages like Python due to maintenance or team familiarity reasons.

### Is litellm or gateway more popular on GitHub?

litellm has more GitHub stars (52,933 vs 12,354). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are litellm and gateway open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (litellm: Other, gateway: MIT).

### Where can I find alternatives to litellm or gateway?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at /tools/berriai-litellm/alternatives and /tools/portkey-ai-gateway/alternatives (/tools/berriai-litellm/alternatives.md, /tools/portkey-ai-gateway/alternatives.md), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at /compare/berriai-litellm-vs-portkey-ai-gateway.md mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, litellm or gateway?

litellm: Very active. gateway: Steady. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for litellm and gateway?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: litellm: /tools/berriai-litellm/trust; gateway: /tools/portkey-ai-gateway/trust.

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=berriai-litellm`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=berriai-litellm)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
