--- title: "browser-use vs CodeGeeX" type: "comparison" canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/browser-use-browser-use-vs-zai-org-codegeex" tools: ["browser-use-browser-use", "zai-org-codegeex"] --- # browser-use vs CodeGeeX *GraphCanon updated Jul 11, 2026* ## Verdict Pick browser-use when license: browser-use is MIT, CodeGeeX is Apache-2.0; pick CodeGeeX when license: CodeGeeX is Apache-2.0, browser-use is MIT. [browser-use](https://browser-use.com) reports 104k GitHub stars, 11k forks, and 296 open issues, last pushed Jul 11, 2026. [CodeGeeX](https://codegeex.cn) has 8.8k stars, 689 forks, and 188 open issues, last pushed Aug 13, 2024. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [browser-use's repository](https://github.com/browser-use/browser-use) and [CodeGeeX's repository](https://github.com/zai-org/CodeGeeX). | | [browser-use](/tools/browser-use-browser-use.md) | [CodeGeeX](/tools/zai-org-codegeex.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Tagline | Make websites accessible for AI agents. Automate tasks online with ease. | CodeGeeX: An Open Multilingual Code Generation Model (KDD 2023) | | Stars | 104,191 | 8,796 | | Forks | 11,486 | 689 | | Open issues | 296 | 188 | | Language | Python | Python | | Adopt for | browser-use is a Python-based toolset that facilitates web task automation and enhances website interaction accessibility for AI agents using browser automation techniques. | - | | Persona | - | - | | Runtime | - | - | | License | The MIT License provides great flexibility and permissiveness for both open-source and proprietary software projects. | Apache-2.0 | | Categories | AI Agents, Developer Tools | Developer Tools, Model Training | ## Trust and health _Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._ | | [browser-use](/tools/browser-use-browser-use.md) | [CodeGeeX](/tools/zai-org-codegeex.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Maintenance | Very active (96%) | Dormant (18%) | | Days since push | 0d | 697d | | Open issues (now) | 296 | 188 | | Security scan | No lockfile | 85 low (85 low) | | Full report | [trust report](/tools/browser-use-browser-use/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/zai-org-codegeex/trust.md) | ## Decision facts: browser-use - **Pricing:** freemium - This tool is provided under the MIT license which means you can use it freely but there are no guarantees or formal support unless included in separate agreements. - **Requirements:** Min 2 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Playwright installation and configuration needed for full functionality. - **Adopt for:** browser-use is a Python-based toolset that facilitates web task automation and enhances website interaction accessibility for AI agents using browser automation techniques. - **License detail:** The MIT License provides great flexibility and permissiveness for both open-source and proprietary software projects. ## Choose when ### Choose browser-use if… - License: browser-use is MIT, CodeGeeX is Apache-2.0. - Pricing: This tool is provided under the MIT license which means you can use it freely but there are no guarantees or formal support unless included in separate agreements.. - Requirements: Min 2 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Playwright installation and configuration needed for full functionality.. - Tags unique to browser-use: ai-agents, ai-tools, browser-automation, llm. - Also covers AI Agents. - When you need to automate interactions with websites in a straightforward manner, especially if your use case already leverages Playwright under the hood. ### Choose CodeGeeX if… - License: CodeGeeX is Apache-2.0, browser-use is MIT. - Tags unique to CodeGeeX: code-generation, pretrained models, tools. - Also covers Model Training. ## When NOT to use browser-use - Avoid using browser-use if your automation workflow requires features that are exclusive to a different framework or library, such as specific functionalities only available in Selenium, as browseruse ## When NOT to use CodeGeeX - Last GitHub push was 698 days ago (dormant maintenance, Aug 13, 2024). Validate activity before betting a new project on CodeGeeX. - Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model. - Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge. ## Common questions ### What is the difference between browser-use and CodeGeeX? browser-use: Make websites accessible for AI agents. Automate tasks online with ease.. CodeGeeX: CodeGeeX: An Open Multilingual Code Generation Model (KDD 2023). See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories. ### When should I choose browser-use over CodeGeeX? Choose browser-use over CodeGeeX when License: browser-use is MIT, CodeGeeX is Apache-2.0; Pricing: This tool is provided under the MIT license which means you can use it freely but there are no guarantees or formal support unless included in separate agreements.; Requirements: Min 2 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Playwright installation and configuration needed for full functionality.; Tags unique to browser-use: ai-agents, ai-tools, browser-automation, llm; Also covers AI Agents; When you need to automate interactions with websites in a straightforward manner, especially if your use case already leverages Playwright under the hood. ### When should I choose CodeGeeX over browser-use? Choose CodeGeeX over browser-use when License: CodeGeeX is Apache-2.0, browser-use is MIT; Tags unique to CodeGeeX: code-generation, pretrained models, tools; Also covers Model Training. ### When should I avoid browser-use? Avoid using browser-use if your automation workflow requires features that are exclusive to a different framework or library, such as specific functionalities only available in Selenium, as browseruse ### When should I avoid CodeGeeX? Last GitHub push was 698 days ago (dormant maintenance, Aug 13, 2024). Validate activity before betting a new project on CodeGeeX. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model. Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge. ### Is browser-use or CodeGeeX more popular on GitHub? browser-use has more GitHub stars (104,191 vs 8,796). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints. ### Are browser-use and CodeGeeX open source? Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (browser-use: MIT, CodeGeeX: Apache-2.0). ### Where can I find alternatives to browser-use or CodeGeeX? GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [browser-use alternatives](/tools/browser-use-browser-use/alternatives) and [CodeGeeX alternatives](/tools/zai-org-codegeex/alternatives) ([browser-use markdown twin](/tools/browser-use-browser-use/alternatives.md), [CodeGeeX markdown twin](/tools/zai-org-codegeex/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes. ### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison? Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/browser-use-browser-use-vs-zai-org-codegeex.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers. ### Which is better maintained, browser-use or CodeGeeX? browser-use: Very active. CodeGeeX: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance. ### Where are the full trust reports for browser-use and CodeGeeX? GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [browser-use trust report](/tools/browser-use-browser-use/trust); [CodeGeeX trust report](/tools/zai-org-codegeex/trust). --- **Machine-readable endpoints** - JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=browser-use-browser-use`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=browser-use-browser-use) - LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt) - Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt) _GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_