--- title: "audapolis vs annyang" type: "comparison" canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/bugbakery-audapolis-vs-talater-annyang" tools: ["bugbakery-audapolis", "talater-annyang"] --- # audapolis vs annyang *GraphCanon updated Jul 30, 2026* ## Verdict Pick audapolis if audapolis is an open-source editor for spoken-word media that provides automatic transcription and a user-friendly interface, all while keeping data local; pick annyang if annyang enables speech-to-text capabilities for web sites with its TypeScript-based JavaScript library. [audapolis](https://github.com/bugbakery/audapolis) reports 1.9k GitHub stars, 61 forks, and 124 open issues, last pushed Jun 24, 2026. [annyang](https://www.talater.com/annyang/) has 6.8k stars, 1.0k forks, and 10 open issues, last pushed Jul 14, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [audapolis's repository](https://github.com/bugbakery/audapolis) and [annyang's repository](https://github.com/TalAter/annyang). | | [audapolis](/tools/bugbakery-audapolis.md) | [annyang](/tools/talater-annyang.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Tagline | An editor for spoken-word media with automatic transcription. | Speech recognition for your site | | Stars | 1,879 | 6,818 | | Forks | 61 | 1,048 | | Open issues | 124 | 10 | | Language | TypeScript | TypeScript | | Adopt for | Audapolis is an open-source editor for spoken-word media that provides automatic transcription and a user-friendly interface, all while keeping data local. | annyang enables speech-to-text capabilities for web sites with its TypeScript-based JavaScript library. | | Persona | - | - | | Runtime | - | - | | License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT License: Permissive free software license notice that gives users the freedom to modify and redistribute as long as they provide source credit. | | Categories | Speech & Audio | Speech & Audio | ## Trust and health _Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._ | | [audapolis](/tools/bugbakery-audapolis.md) | [annyang](/tools/talater-annyang.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Maintenance | Steady (60%) | Active (82%) | | Days since push | 36d | 15d | | Open issues (now) | 124 | 10 | | Owner type | Organization | User | | Full report | [trust report](/tools/bugbakery-audapolis/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/talater-annyang/trust.md) | ## Decision facts: audapolis - **Adopt for:** Audapolis is an open-source editor for spoken-word media that provides automatic transcription and a user-friendly interface, all while keeping data local. ## Decision facts: annyang - **Pricing:** freemium - Available at no charge with an open-source MIT license, making it suitable for both personal and commercial projects. - **Adopt for:** annyang enables speech-to-text capabilities for web sites with its TypeScript-based JavaScript library. - **License detail:** MIT License: Permissive free software license notice that gives users the freedom to modify and redistribute as long as they provide source credit. ## Choose when ### Choose audapolis if… - License: audapolis is AGPL-3.0, annyang is MIT. - Tags unique to audapolis: audio-editing, transcription, video-editing. - When you need to edit spoken-word content like podcasts or audiobooks on your local machine without relying on cloud services ### Choose annyang if… - License: annyang is MIT, audapolis is AGPL-3.0. - Pricing: Available at no charge with an open-source MIT license, making it suitable for both personal and commercial projects.. - Tags unique to annyang: mit-license, speech, speech-recognition, voice. - When you are working on a project that requires integrating voice commands into a website and your tech stack already includes TypeScript or JavaScript. ## When NOT to use audapolis - If you prefer using cloud-based tools that offer real-time collaboration features - When looking for specialized advanced mixing or sound engineering capabilities for complex audio productions ## When NOT to use annyang - If the project requires a high level of speech recognition accuracy in noisy environments, as annyang might not perform optimally under such conditions. - For applications demanding real-time transcription with low latency, considering that annang may introduce some delay which could be critical for certain use cases. ## Common questions ### What is the difference between audapolis and annyang? audapolis: An editor for spoken-word media with automatic transcription.. annyang: Speech recognition for your site. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories. ### When should I choose audapolis over annyang? Choose audapolis over annyang when License: audapolis is AGPL-3.0, annyang is MIT; Tags unique to audapolis: audio-editing, transcription, video-editing; When you need to edit spoken-word content like podcasts or audiobooks on your local machine without relying on cloud services. ### When should I choose annyang over audapolis? Choose annyang over audapolis when License: annyang is MIT, audapolis is AGPL-3.0; Pricing: Available at no charge with an open-source MIT license, making it suitable for both personal and commercial projects.; Tags unique to annyang: mit-license, speech, speech-recognition, voice; When you are working on a project that requires integrating voice commands into a website and your tech stack already includes TypeScript or JavaScript. ### When should I avoid audapolis? If you prefer using cloud-based tools that offer real-time collaboration features When looking for specialized advanced mixing or sound engineering capabilities for complex audio productions ### When should I avoid annyang? If the project requires a high level of speech recognition accuracy in noisy environments, as annyang might not perform optimally under such conditions. For applications demanding real-time transcription with low latency, considering that annang may introduce some delay which could be critical for certain use cases. ### Is audapolis or annyang more popular on GitHub? annyang has more GitHub stars (6,818 vs 1,879). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints. ### Are audapolis and annyang open source? Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (audapolis: AGPL-3.0, annyang: MIT). ### Where can I find alternatives to audapolis or annyang? GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [audapolis alternatives](/tools/bugbakery-audapolis/alternatives) and [annyang alternatives](/tools/talater-annyang/alternatives) ([audapolis markdown twin](/tools/bugbakery-audapolis/alternatives.md), [annyang markdown twin](/tools/talater-annyang/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes. ### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison? Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/bugbakery-audapolis-vs-talater-annyang.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers. ### Which is better maintained, audapolis or annyang? audapolis: Steady. annyang: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance. ### Where are the full trust reports for audapolis and annyang? GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [audapolis trust report](/tools/bugbakery-audapolis/trust); [annyang trust report](/tools/talater-annyang/trust). --- **Machine-readable endpoints** - JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=bugbakery-audapolis`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=bugbakery-audapolis) - LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt) - Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt) _GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_