--- title: "audapolis vs speech_recognition" type: "comparison" canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/bugbakery-audapolis-vs-uberi-speech-recognition" tools: ["bugbakery-audapolis", "uberi-speech-recognition"] --- # audapolis vs speech_recognition *GraphCanon updated Jul 30, 2026* ## Verdict Pick audapolis if audapolis is an open-source editor for spoken-word media that provides automatic transcription and a user-friendly interface, all while keeping data local; pick speech_recognition if speech_recognition is a Python library providing support for speech recognition across multiple engines and APIs. [audapolis](https://github.com/bugbakery/audapolis) reports 1.9k GitHub stars, 61 forks, and 124 open issues, last pushed Jun 24, 2026. [speech_recognition](https://pypi.python.org/pypi/SpeechRecognition/) has 9.0k stars, 2.4k forks, and 312 open issues, last pushed Jun 16, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [audapolis's repository](https://github.com/bugbakery/audapolis) and [speech_recognition's repository](https://github.com/Uberi/speech_recognition). | | [audapolis](/tools/bugbakery-audapolis.md) | [speech_recognition](/tools/uberi-speech-recognition.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Tagline | An editor for spoken-word media with automatic transcription. | Speech recognition module for Python | | Stars | 1,879 | 8,977 | | Forks | 61 | 2,415 | | Open issues | 124 | 312 | | Language | TypeScript | Python | | Adopt for | Audapolis is an open-source editor for spoken-word media that provides automatic transcription and a user-friendly interface, all while keeping data local. | speech_recognition is a Python library providing support for speech recognition across multiple engines and APIs. | | Persona | - | - | | Runtime | - | - | | License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-3-Clause | | Categories | Speech & Audio | Speech & Audio | ## Trust and health _Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._ | | [audapolis](/tools/bugbakery-audapolis.md) | [speech_recognition](/tools/uberi-speech-recognition.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Days since push | 36d | 43d | | Open issues (now) | 124 | 312 | | Owner type | Organization | User | | Full report | [trust report](/tools/bugbakery-audapolis/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/uberi-speech-recognition/trust.md) | ## Decision facts: audapolis - **Adopt for:** Audapolis is an open-source editor for spoken-word media that provides automatic transcription and a user-friendly interface, all while keeping data local. ## Decision facts: speech_recognition - **Pricing:** freemium - The library itself is free and open-source, but costs might arise from using third-party speech recognition services it supports. - **Adopt for:** speech_recognition is a Python library providing support for speech recognition across multiple engines and APIs. - **License detail:** BSD-3-Clause ## Choose when ### Choose audapolis if… - audapolis is primarily TypeScript; speech_recognition is Python. - License: audapolis is AGPL-3.0, speech_recognition is BSD-3-Clause. - Tags unique to audapolis: audio-editing, transcription, video-editing. - When you need to edit spoken-word content like podcasts or audiobooks on your local machine without relying on cloud services ### Choose speech_recognition if… - speech_recognition is primarily Python; audapolis is TypeScript. - License: speech_recognition is BSD-3-Clause, audapolis is AGPL-3.0. - Pricing: The library itself is free and open-source, but costs might arise from using third-party speech recognition services it supports.. - Tags unique to speech_recognition: audio, python, speech-recognition. - Use when you need an open-source solution with broad engine compatibility, supporting both online and offline modes. ## When NOT to use audapolis - If you prefer using cloud-based tools that offer real-time collaboration features - When looking for specialized advanced mixing or sound engineering capabilities for complex audio productions ## When NOT to use speech_recognition - Avoid if your project mandates real-time, low-latency processing exclusively, since some of the supported engines might have higher latency. - Do not use if strict accuracy in speaker diarization is crucial; competing APIs like Recall.ai may offer better speaker identification features. ## Common questions ### What is the difference between audapolis and speech_recognition? audapolis: An editor for spoken-word media with automatic transcription.. speech_recognition: Speech recognition module for Python. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories. ### When should I choose audapolis over speech_recognition? Choose audapolis over speech_recognition when audapolis is primarily TypeScript; speech_recognition is Python; License: audapolis is AGPL-3.0, speech_recognition is BSD-3-Clause; Tags unique to audapolis: audio-editing, transcription, video-editing; When you need to edit spoken-word content like podcasts or audiobooks on your local machine without relying on cloud services. ### When should I choose speech_recognition over audapolis? Choose speech_recognition over audapolis when speech_recognition is primarily Python; audapolis is TypeScript; License: speech_recognition is BSD-3-Clause, audapolis is AGPL-3.0; Pricing: The library itself is free and open-source, but costs might arise from using third-party speech recognition services it supports.; Tags unique to speech_recognition: audio, python, speech-recognition; Use when you need an open-source solution with broad engine compatibility, supporting both online and offline modes. ### When should I avoid audapolis? If you prefer using cloud-based tools that offer real-time collaboration features When looking for specialized advanced mixing or sound engineering capabilities for complex audio productions ### When should I avoid speech_recognition? Avoid if your project mandates real-time, low-latency processing exclusively, since some of the supported engines might have higher latency. Do not use if strict accuracy in speaker diarization is crucial; competing APIs like Recall.ai may offer better speaker identification features. ### Is audapolis or speech_recognition more popular on GitHub? speech_recognition has more GitHub stars (8,977 vs 1,879). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints. ### Are audapolis and speech_recognition open source? Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (audapolis: AGPL-3.0, speech_recognition: BSD-3-Clause). ### Where can I find alternatives to audapolis or speech_recognition? GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [audapolis alternatives](/tools/bugbakery-audapolis/alternatives) and [speech_recognition alternatives](/tools/uberi-speech-recognition/alternatives) ([audapolis markdown twin](/tools/bugbakery-audapolis/alternatives.md), [speech_recognition markdown twin](/tools/uberi-speech-recognition/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes. ### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison? Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/bugbakery-audapolis-vs-uberi-speech-recognition.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers. ### Which is better maintained, audapolis or speech_recognition? audapolis: Steady. speech_recognition: Steady. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance. ### Where are the full trust reports for audapolis and speech_recognition? GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [audapolis trust report](/tools/bugbakery-audapolis/trust); [speech_recognition trust report](/tools/uberi-speech-recognition/trust). --- **Machine-readable endpoints** - JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=bugbakery-audapolis`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=bugbakery-audapolis) - LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt) - Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt) _GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_