--- title: "flowgram.ai vs flowable-engine" type: "comparison" canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/bytedance-flowgram-ai-vs-flowable-flowable-engine" tools: ["bytedance-flowgram-ai", "flowable-flowable-engine"] --- # flowgram.ai vs flowable-engine *GraphCanon updated Sep 20, 2026* ## Verdict Pick flowgram.ai if flowGram.ai is an extensible workflow development framework for TypeScript that aids in rapidly creating AI workflows with visual tools, including no-code options; pick flowable-engine if flowable-engine is a Java-based BPM platform which focuses on being compact and efficient for developers, system admins, and business users. [flowgram.ai](https://flowgram.ai) reports 8.5k GitHub stars, 768 forks, and 110 open issues, last pushed Sep 1, 2026. [flowable-engine](https://www.flowable.org) has 9.5k stars, 2.9k forks, and 411 open issues, last pushed Sep 12, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [flowgram.ai's repository](https://github.com/bytedance/flowgram.ai) and [flowable-engine's repository](https://github.com/flowable/flowable-engine). | | [flowgram.ai](/tools/bytedance-flowgram-ai.md) | [flowable-engine](/tools/flowable-flowable-engine.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Tagline | Extensible workflow development framework aiding in rapid AI workflow platform creation | A compact and highly efficient workflow and Business Process Management (BPM) platform | | Stars | 8,452 | 9,535 | | Forks | 768 | 2,887 | | Open issues | 110 | 411 | | Language | TypeScript | Java | | Adopt for | FlowGram.ai is an extensible workflow development framework for TypeScript that aids in rapidly creating AI workflows with visual tools, including no-code options. | Flowable-engine is a Java-based BPM platform which focuses on being compact and efficient for developers, system admins, and business users. | | Persona | - | - | | Runtime | - | - | | License | MIT | Apache-2.0 | | Categories | Developer Tools | Developer Tools | ## Trust and health _Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._ | | [flowgram.ai](/tools/bytedance-flowgram-ai.md) | [flowable-engine](/tools/flowable-flowable-engine.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Maintenance | Active (82%) | Very active (96%) | | Days since push | 14d | 2d | | Open issues (now) | 110 | 411 | | Stars delta | +102 (30d) | +84 (30d) | | Open issues delta | +36 (30d) | +10 (30d) | | Full report | [trust report](/tools/bytedance-flowgram-ai/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/flowable-flowable-engine/trust.md) | ## Decision facts: flowgram.ai - **Adopt for:** FlowGram.ai is an extensible workflow development framework for TypeScript that aids in rapidly creating AI workflows with visual tools, including no-code options. ## Decision facts: flowable-engine - **Adopt for:** Flowable-engine is a Java-based BPM platform which focuses on being compact and efficient for developers, system admins, and business users. ## Choose when ### Choose flowgram.ai if… - flowgram.ai is primarily TypeScript; flowable-engine is Java. - License: flowgram.ai is MIT, flowable-engine is Apache-2.0. - Tags unique to flowgram.ai: ai, automation, data-flow, form. - When you need to create sophisticated AI workflows using a canvas-based interface with TypeScript ### Choose flowable-engine if… - flowable-engine is primarily Java; flowgram.ai is TypeScript. - License: flowable-engine is Apache-2.0, flowgram.ai is MIT. - Tags unique to flowable-engine: bpmn, java, workflow, workflow-engine. - When your project requires extensive integration with existing Java applications without adding significant overhead. ## When NOT to use flowgram.ai - Avoid if your project strictly forbids the use of TypeScript or if JavaScript alone suffices for your needs - Not suitable when you require a fully-fledged, pre-built automation solution without custom workflow development ## When NOT to use flowable-engine - If you need a BPM solution that heavily relies on graphical process design tools, as Flowable-engine may not cater to non-technical users as intuitively as some competitors. - In scenarios needing extensive support for custom programming languages outside of Java, as this could limit its applicability and efficacy. ## Common questions ### What is the difference between flowgram.ai and flowable-engine? flowgram.ai: Extensible workflow development framework aiding in rapid AI workflow platform creation. flowable-engine: A compact and highly efficient workflow and Business Process Management (BPM) platform. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories. ### When should I choose flowgram.ai over flowable-engine? Choose flowgram.ai over flowable-engine when flowgram.ai is primarily TypeScript; flowable-engine is Java; License: flowgram.ai is MIT, flowable-engine is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to flowgram.ai: ai, automation, data-flow, form; When you need to create sophisticated AI workflows using a canvas-based interface with TypeScript. ### When should I choose flowable-engine over flowgram.ai? Choose flowable-engine over flowgram.ai when flowable-engine is primarily Java; flowgram.ai is TypeScript; License: flowable-engine is Apache-2.0, flowgram.ai is MIT; Tags unique to flowable-engine: bpmn, java, workflow, workflow-engine; When your project requires extensive integration with existing Java applications without adding significant overhead. ### When should I avoid flowgram.ai? Avoid if your project strictly forbids the use of TypeScript or if JavaScript alone suffices for your needs Not suitable when you require a fully-fledged, pre-built automation solution without custom workflow development ### When should I avoid flowable-engine? If you need a BPM solution that heavily relies on graphical process design tools, as Flowable-engine may not cater to non-technical users as intuitively as some competitors. In scenarios needing extensive support for custom programming languages outside of Java, as this could limit its applicability and efficacy. ### Is flowgram.ai or flowable-engine more popular on GitHub? flowable-engine has more GitHub stars (9,535 vs 8,452). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints. ### Are flowgram.ai and flowable-engine open source? Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (flowgram.ai: MIT, flowable-engine: Apache-2.0). ### Where can I find alternatives to flowgram.ai or flowable-engine? GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [flowgram.ai alternatives](/tools/bytedance-flowgram-ai/alternatives) and [flowable-engine alternatives](/tools/flowable-flowable-engine/alternatives) ([flowgram.ai markdown twin](/tools/bytedance-flowgram-ai/alternatives.md), [flowable-engine markdown twin](/tools/flowable-flowable-engine/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes. ### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison? Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/bytedance-flowgram-ai-vs-flowable-flowable-engine.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers. ### Which is better maintained, flowgram.ai or flowable-engine? flowgram.ai: Active. flowable-engine: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance. ### Where are the full trust reports for flowgram.ai and flowable-engine? GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [flowgram.ai trust report](/tools/bytedance-flowgram-ai/trust); [flowable-engine trust report](/tools/flowable-flowable-engine/trust). --- **Machine-readable endpoints** - JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=bytedance-flowgram-ai`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=bytedance-flowgram-ai) - LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt) - Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt) _GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_