---
title: "casdoor vs chinese-llm-benchmark"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/casdoor-casdoor-vs-jeinlee1991-chinese-llm-benchmark"
tools: ["casdoor-casdoor", "jeinlee1991-chinese-llm-benchmark"]
---

# casdoor vs chinese-llm-benchmark

*GraphCanon updated Jul 11, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick casdoor if casdoor is an open-source solution for identity and access management (IAM), with robust agent-first capabilities that integrate with various authentication protocols including OAuth, OIDC, SAML, CAS, LDAP, SCIM, WebAuth; pick chinese-llm-benchmark if chinese-llm-benchmark (ReLE评测) 是一个专门用于评估中文大规模语言模型的工具，它可以全面评测涵盖商用和开源的大规模语言模型，并提供详细排行榜及超过200万条缺陷数据。它的主要特点是多维度评估能力和丰富的领域覆盖范围。.

[casdoor](https://casdoor.ai) reports 14k GitHub stars, 1.7k forks, and 100 open issues, last pushed Jul 10, 2026. [chinese-llm-benchmark](https://nonelinear.com) has 6.3k stars, 256 forks, and 16 open issues, last pushed Jul 9, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [casdoor's repository](https://github.com/casdoor/casdoor) and [chinese-llm-benchmark's repository](https://github.com/jeinlee1991/chinese-llm-benchmark).

| | [casdoor](/tools/casdoor-casdoor.md) | [chinese-llm-benchmark](/tools/jeinlee1991-chinese-llm-benchmark.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | An open-source Agent-first Identity and Access Management (IAM) / LLM MCP & agent gateway and auth server | ReLE评测：中文AI大模型能力评测 |
| Stars | 13,923 | 6,265 |
| Forks | 1,734 | 256 |
| Open issues | 100 | 16 |
| Language | Go | - |
| Adopt for | Casdoor is an open-source solution for identity and access management (IAM), with robust agent-first capabilities that integrate with various authentication protocols including OAuth, OIDC, SAML, CAS, LDAP, SCIM, WebAuth | chinese-llm-benchmark (ReLE评测) 是一个专门用于评估中文大规模语言模型的工具，它可以全面评测涵盖商用和开源的大规模语言模型，并提供详细排行榜及超过200万条缺陷数据。它的主要特点是多维度评估能力和丰富的领域覆盖范围。 |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | Apache-2.0 | - |
| Categories | AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability | Evaluation & Observability |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [casdoor](/tools/casdoor-casdoor.md) | [chinese-llm-benchmark](/tools/jeinlee1991-chinese-llm-benchmark.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Days since push | 0d | 2d |
| Open issues (now) | 100 | 16 |
| Owner type | Organization | User |
| Security scan | No MCP manifest | No lockfile |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/casdoor-casdoor/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/jeinlee1991-chinese-llm-benchmark/trust.md) |

## Decision facts: casdoor

- **Adopt for:** Casdoor is an open-source solution for identity and access management (IAM), with robust agent-first capabilities that integrate with various authentication protocols including OAuth, OIDC, SAML, CAS, LDAP, SCIM, WebAuth

## Decision facts: chinese-llm-benchmark

- **Adopt for:** chinese-llm-benchmark (ReLE评测) 是一个专门用于评估中文大规模语言模型的工具，它可以全面评测涵盖商用和开源的大规模语言模型，并提供详细排行榜及超过200万条缺陷数据。它的主要特点是多维度评估能力和丰富的领域覆盖范围。

## Choose when

### Choose casdoor if…

- Tags unique to casdoor: iam, authentication, llm, auth.
- Also covers AI Agents.
- casdoor ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- When you require a comprehensive IAM tool that supports multiple authentication methods such as OAuth, OIDC, SAML, CAS, LDAP, and more.

### Choose chinese-llm-benchmark if…

- Tags unique to chinese-llm-benchmark: artificial-intelligence, llm-agent, agentic-ai, llm evaluation.
- 当需要对多种中文字句生成、理解能力进行综合评价时使用；
- Leaner open-issue backlog (16).

## When NOT to use casdoor

- If your project requires proprietary technology exclusivity and cannot utilize open-source tools like Casdoor licensed under Apache-2.0.
- When the depth of integration with specific authentication methods (e.g., some advanced SAML configurations) is critical, and you find that other competitors offer more specialized or better-detailed/
- +customizable versions of support for those methods.
- If your environment strictly requires closed-source components for security reasons, thus Casdoor would not be a suitable choice due to its open nature.

## When NOT to use chinese-llm-benchmark

- 当评估对象仅限于英文或其他非中文的语言模型时不应使用此工具；
- 如果您的主要关注点是多语种支持或模型在特定国际化场景中的性能表现。
- 如果您需要的是一款侧重于通用语言处理任务而非特定领域知识和应用领域的评测工具。

## Common questions

### What is the difference between casdoor and chinese-llm-benchmark?

casdoor: An open-source Agent-first Identity and Access Management (IAM) / LLM MCP & agent gateway and auth server. chinese-llm-benchmark: ReLE评测：中文AI大模型能力评测. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose casdoor over chinese-llm-benchmark?

Choose casdoor over chinese-llm-benchmark when Tags unique to casdoor: iam, authentication, llm, auth; Also covers AI Agents; casdoor ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; When you require a comprehensive IAM tool that supports multiple authentication methods such as OAuth, OIDC, SAML, CAS, LDAP, and more.

### When should I choose chinese-llm-benchmark over casdoor?

Choose chinese-llm-benchmark over casdoor when Tags unique to chinese-llm-benchmark: artificial-intelligence, llm-agent, agentic-ai, llm evaluation; 当需要对多种中文字句生成、理解能力进行综合评价时使用；; Leaner open-issue backlog (16).

### When should I avoid casdoor?

If your project requires proprietary technology exclusivity and cannot utilize open-source tools like Casdoor licensed under Apache-2.0. When the depth of integration with specific authentication methods (e.g., some advanced SAML configurations) is critical, and you find that other competitors offer more specialized or better-detailed/ +customizable versions of support for those methods. If your environment strictly requires closed-source components for security reasons, thus Casdoor would not be a suitable choice due to its open nature.

### When should I avoid chinese-llm-benchmark?

当评估对象仅限于英文或其他非中文的语言模型时不应使用此工具； 如果您的主要关注点是多语种支持或模型在特定国际化场景中的性能表现。 如果您需要的是一款侧重于通用语言处理任务而非特定领域知识和应用领域的评测工具。

### Is casdoor or chinese-llm-benchmark more popular on GitHub?

casdoor has more GitHub stars (13,923 vs 6,265). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are casdoor and chinese-llm-benchmark open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub.

### Where can I find alternatives to casdoor or chinese-llm-benchmark?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [casdoor alternatives](/tools/casdoor-casdoor/alternatives) and [chinese-llm-benchmark alternatives](/tools/jeinlee1991-chinese-llm-benchmark/alternatives) ([casdoor markdown twin](/tools/casdoor-casdoor/alternatives.md), [chinese-llm-benchmark markdown twin](/tools/jeinlee1991-chinese-llm-benchmark/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/casdoor-casdoor-vs-jeinlee1991-chinese-llm-benchmark.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, casdoor or chinese-llm-benchmark?

casdoor: Very active. chinese-llm-benchmark: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for casdoor and chinese-llm-benchmark?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [casdoor trust report](/tools/casdoor-casdoor/trust); [chinese-llm-benchmark trust report](/tools/jeinlee1991-chinese-llm-benchmark/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=casdoor-casdoor`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=casdoor-casdoor)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_