--- title: "oh-my-openagent vs pro-workflow" type: "comparison" canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/code-yeongyu-oh-my-openagent-vs-rohitg00-pro-workflow" tools: ["code-yeongyu-oh-my-openagent", "rohitg00-pro-workflow"] --- # oh-my-openagent vs pro-workflow *GraphCanon updated Jul 15, 2026* ## Verdict Pick oh-my-openagent when oh-my-openagent is primarily TypeScript; pro-workflow is JavaScript; pick pro-workflow when pro-workflow is primarily JavaScript; oh-my-openagent is TypeScript. [oh-my-openagent](https://omo.dev) reports 66k GitHub stars, 5.3k forks, and 876 open issues, last pushed Jul 11, 2026. [pro-workflow](https://rohitg00.github.io/pro-workflow/infographic.html) has 2.6k stars, 253 forks, and 9 open issues, last pushed Jul 13, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [oh-my-openagent's repository](https://github.com/code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent) and [pro-workflow's repository](https://github.com/rohitg00/pro-workflow). | | [oh-my-openagent](/tools/code-yeongyu-oh-my-openagent.md) | [pro-workflow](/tools/rohitg00-pro-workflow.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Tagline | A coding agent for complex codebases, supporting multiple AI agents like ChatGPT and Claude. | Claude Code learns from your corrections: self-correcting memory that compounds over 50+ sessions. Context engineering, parallel worktrees, agent teams, and 17 battle-tested skills. | | Stars | 65,526 | 2,613 | | Forks | 5,344 | 253 | | Open issues | 876 | 9 | | Language | TypeScript | JavaScript | | Adopt for | Decisive facts about oh-my-openagent. | - | | Persona | - | - | | Runtime | - | - | | License | Other | - | | Categories | AI Agents, Developer Tools | AI Agents, Developer Tools | ## Trust and health _Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._ | | [oh-my-openagent](/tools/code-yeongyu-oh-my-openagent.md) | [pro-workflow](/tools/rohitg00-pro-workflow.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Days since push | 0d | 1d | | Open issues (now) | 876 | 9 | | Full report | [trust report](/tools/code-yeongyu-oh-my-openagent/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/rohitg00-pro-workflow/trust.md) | ## Decision facts: oh-my-openagent - **Adopt for:** Decisive facts about oh-my-openagent. ## Choose when ### Choose oh-my-openagent if… - oh-my-openagent is primarily TypeScript; pro-workflow is JavaScript. - Tags unique to oh-my-openagent: ai, anthropic, chatgpt, codex. - oh-my-openagent ships an MCP server manifest. - When working with complex codebases and requiring integration with multiple AI systems like Anthropic, ChatGPT, and Claude for better code orchestration and lifecycle hook management. ### Choose pro-workflow if… - pro-workflow is primarily JavaScript; oh-my-openagent is TypeScript. - Tags unique to pro-workflow: agent-orchestration, ai-coding, ai-workflow, claude code. - More recently updated (last pushed Jul 13, 2026). ## When NOT to use oh-my-openagent - When your project is not reliant on AI integration or complex orchestration capabilities. For simpler codebases, its advanced features may be overkill. - If your development environment does not support TypeScript or if you are exclusively working with Codex CLI and prefer a less integrated solution, opting for another tool could be more suitable since ## When NOT to use pro-workflow - AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. - Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model. ## Common questions ### What is the difference between oh-my-openagent and pro-workflow? oh-my-openagent: A coding agent for complex codebases, supporting multiple AI agents like ChatGPT and Claude.. pro-workflow: Claude Code learns from your corrections: self-correcting memory that compounds over 50+ sessions. Context engineering, parallel worktrees, agent teams, and 17 battle-tested skills.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories. ### When should I choose oh-my-openagent over pro-workflow? Choose oh-my-openagent over pro-workflow when oh-my-openagent is primarily TypeScript; pro-workflow is JavaScript; Tags unique to oh-my-openagent: ai, anthropic, chatgpt, codex; oh-my-openagent ships an MCP server manifest; When working with complex codebases and requiring integration with multiple AI systems like Anthropic, ChatGPT, and Claude for better code orchestration and lifecycle hook management. ### When should I choose pro-workflow over oh-my-openagent? Choose pro-workflow over oh-my-openagent when pro-workflow is primarily JavaScript; oh-my-openagent is TypeScript; Tags unique to pro-workflow: agent-orchestration, ai-coding, ai-workflow, claude code; More recently updated (last pushed Jul 13, 2026). ### When should I avoid oh-my-openagent? When your project is not reliant on AI integration or complex orchestration capabilities. For simpler codebases, its advanced features may be overkill. If your development environment does not support TypeScript or if you are exclusively working with Codex CLI and prefer a less integrated solution, opting for another tool could be more suitable since ### When should I avoid pro-workflow? AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model. ### Is oh-my-openagent or pro-workflow more popular on GitHub? oh-my-openagent has more GitHub stars (65,526 vs 2,613). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints. ### Are oh-my-openagent and pro-workflow open source? Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub. ### Where can I find alternatives to oh-my-openagent or pro-workflow? GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [oh-my-openagent alternatives](/tools/code-yeongyu-oh-my-openagent/alternatives) and [pro-workflow alternatives](/tools/rohitg00-pro-workflow/alternatives) ([oh-my-openagent markdown twin](/tools/code-yeongyu-oh-my-openagent/alternatives.md), [pro-workflow markdown twin](/tools/rohitg00-pro-workflow/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes. ### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison? Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/code-yeongyu-oh-my-openagent-vs-rohitg00-pro-workflow.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers. ### Which is better maintained, oh-my-openagent or pro-workflow? oh-my-openagent: Very active. pro-workflow: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance. ### Where are the full trust reports for oh-my-openagent and pro-workflow? GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [oh-my-openagent trust report](/tools/code-yeongyu-oh-my-openagent/trust); [pro-workflow trust report](/tools/rohitg00-pro-workflow/trust). --- **Machine-readable endpoints** - JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=code-yeongyu-oh-my-openagent`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=code-yeongyu-oh-my-openagent) - LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt) - Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt) _GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_