---
title: "conduit vs awesome"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/cogwheel0-conduit-vs-sindresorhus-awesome"
tools: ["cogwheel0-conduit", "sindresorhus-awesome"]
---

# conduit vs awesome

*GraphCanon updated Jul 15, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick conduit when license: conduit is GPL-3.0, awesome is CC0-1.0; pick awesome when license: awesome is CC0-1.0, conduit is GPL-3.0.

[conduit](http://conduit.mobile) reports 1.8k GitHub stars, 186 forks, and 53 open issues, last pushed Jul 15, 2026. [awesome](https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome) has 484k stars, 36k forks, and 92 open issues, last pushed Jun 30, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [conduit's repository](https://github.com/cogwheel0/conduit) and [awesome's repository](https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome).

| | [conduit](/tools/cogwheel0-conduit.md) | [awesome](/tools/sindresorhus-awesome.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | Mobile (iOS/Android) client for OpenWebUI. Chat with your self‑hosted AI. | 😎 Awesome lists about all kinds of interesting topics |
| Stars | 1,788 | 484,026 |
| Forks | 186 | 35,799 |
| Open issues | 53 | 92 |
| Language | Dart | - |
| Adopt for | - | A curated collection of resources on a variety of technological topics, emphasizing hardware and robotics. |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | GPL-3.0 | CC0-1.0 |
| Categories | Developer Tools, Inference & Serving | Developer Tools |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [conduit](/tools/cogwheel0-conduit.md) | [awesome](/tools/sindresorhus-awesome.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maintenance | Very active (96%) | Active (82%) |
| Days since push | 0d | 11d |
| Open issues (now) | 53 | 92 |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/cogwheel0-conduit/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/sindresorhus-awesome/trust.md) |

## Decision facts: awesome

- **Adopt for:** A curated collection of resources on a variety of technological topics, emphasizing hardware and robotics.

## Choose when

### Choose conduit if…

- License: conduit is GPL-3.0, awesome is CC0-1.0.
- Tags unique to conduit: dart, ollama, openwebui, selfhosted.
- Also covers Inference & Serving.

### Choose awesome if…

- License: awesome is CC0-1.0, conduit is GPL-3.0.
- Tags unique to awesome: awesome, awesome-list, lists, resources.
- When you need well-organized access to diverse technical subjects from IoT to robotics

## When NOT to use conduit

- Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
- Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.

## When NOT to use awesome

- If seeking specific coding frameworks or libraries for software development rather than hardware-focused resources
- In scenarios requiring real-time interactive support or forums, as the content is static lists without active discussion

## Common questions

### What is the difference between conduit and awesome?

conduit: Mobile (iOS/Android) client for OpenWebUI. Chat with your self‑hosted AI.. awesome: 😎 Awesome lists about all kinds of interesting topics. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose conduit over awesome?

Choose conduit over awesome when License: conduit is GPL-3.0, awesome is CC0-1.0; Tags unique to conduit: dart, ollama, openwebui, selfhosted; Also covers Inference & Serving.

### When should I choose awesome over conduit?

Choose awesome over conduit when License: awesome is CC0-1.0, conduit is GPL-3.0; Tags unique to awesome: awesome, awesome-list, lists, resources; When you need well-organized access to diverse technical subjects from IoT to robotics.

### When should I avoid conduit?

Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.

### When should I avoid awesome?

If seeking specific coding frameworks or libraries for software development rather than hardware-focused resources In scenarios requiring real-time interactive support or forums, as the content is static lists without active discussion

### Is conduit or awesome more popular on GitHub?

awesome has more GitHub stars (484,026 vs 1,788). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are conduit and awesome open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (conduit: GPL-3.0, awesome: CC0-1.0).

### Where can I find alternatives to conduit or awesome?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [conduit alternatives](/tools/cogwheel0-conduit/alternatives) and [awesome alternatives](/tools/sindresorhus-awesome/alternatives) ([conduit markdown twin](/tools/cogwheel0-conduit/alternatives.md), [awesome markdown twin](/tools/sindresorhus-awesome/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/cogwheel0-conduit-vs-sindresorhus-awesome.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, conduit or awesome?

conduit: Very active. awesome: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for conduit and awesome?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [conduit trust report](/tools/cogwheel0-conduit/trust); [awesome trust report](/tools/sindresorhus-awesome/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=cogwheel0-conduit`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=cogwheel0-conduit)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
