--- title: "concierge vs paseo" type: "comparison" canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/concierge-hq-concierge-vs-getpaseo-paseo" tools: ["concierge-hq-concierge", "getpaseo-paseo"] --- # concierge vs paseo *GraphCanon updated Sep 20, 2026* ## Verdict Pick concierge if concierge is a Python-based universal SDK designed for developing next-generation MCP servers that facilitate advanced chatbot applications and automation services leveraging AI agents; pick paseo if paseo runs a local server daemon to manage coding agents through various clients including desktop apps, mobile apps, CLI, and self-hosted web UI. [concierge](https://platform.getconcierge.app) reports 531 GitHub stars, 99 forks, and 55 open issues, last pushed Jun 9, 2026. [paseo](https://paseo.sh) has 18k stars, 2.0k forks, and 853 open issues, last pushed Sep 17, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [concierge's repository](https://github.com/concierge-hq/concierge) and [paseo's repository](https://github.com/getpaseo/paseo). | | [concierge](/tools/concierge-hq-concierge.md) | [paseo](/tools/getpaseo-paseo.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Tagline | Universal SDK for building next-gen MCP servers | Orchestrate multiple coding agents from desktop and mobile | | Stars | 531 | 17,619 | | Forks | 99 | 2,003 | | Open issues | 55 | 853 | | Language | Python | TypeScript | | Adopt for | Concierge is a Python-based universal SDK designed for developing next-generation MCP servers that facilitate advanced chatbot applications and automation services leveraging AI agents. | Paseo runs a local server daemon to manage coding agents through various clients including desktop apps, mobile apps, CLI, and self-hosted web UI. | | Persona | - | - | | Runtime | - | - | | License | Other | Other | | Categories | AI Agents, Developer Tools | AI Agents, Developer Tools | ## Trust and health _Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._ | | [concierge](/tools/concierge-hq-concierge.md) | [paseo](/tools/getpaseo-paseo.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Maintenance | Slowing (36%) | Very active (96%) | | Days since push | 103d | 0d | | Open issues (now) | 55 | 853 | | Stars delta | -1 (30d) | +4.4k (30d) | | Open issues delta | 0 (30d) | +122 (30d) | | Full report | [trust report](/tools/concierge-hq-concierge/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/getpaseo-paseo/trust.md) | ## Decision facts: concierge - **Adopt for:** Concierge is a Python-based universal SDK designed for developing next-generation MCP servers that facilitate advanced chatbot applications and automation services leveraging AI agents. ## Decision facts: paseo - **Adopt for:** Paseo runs a local server daemon to manage coding agents through various clients including desktop apps, mobile apps, CLI, and self-hosted web UI. ## Choose when ### Choose concierge if… - concierge is primarily Python; paseo is TypeScript. - Tags unique to concierge: agentic-ai, automation, llm. - concierge ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment. - When you need to build self-hosted, sophisticated chatbot applications requiring integration with MCP protocols and workflow automation technologies. ### Choose paseo if… - paseo is primarily TypeScript; concierge is Python. - Tags unique to paseo: ade, android, claude-code, codex. - When you need to orchestrate multiple code generation or modification tasks concurrently across different platforms ## When NOT to use concierge - Avoid if you are working in environments that do not support Python or require SDK functionalities for languages other than Python. - Not suitable for projects that are constrained by licenses outside the provided 'Other' license category, which may limit interoperability and contribution freedoms. ## When NOT to use paseo - If your workflow does not involve managing coding agents from desktop, mobile apps, and CLI interfaces - When you prefer cloud-based orchestration without needing to set up a local daemon server ## Common questions ### What is the difference between concierge and paseo? concierge: Universal SDK for building next-gen MCP servers. paseo: Orchestrate multiple coding agents from desktop and mobile. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories. ### When should I choose concierge over paseo? Choose concierge over paseo when concierge is primarily Python; paseo is TypeScript; Tags unique to concierge: agentic-ai, automation, llm; concierge ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; When you need to build self-hosted, sophisticated chatbot applications requiring integration with MCP protocols and workflow automation technologies. ### When should I choose paseo over concierge? Choose paseo over concierge when paseo is primarily TypeScript; concierge is Python; Tags unique to paseo: ade, android, claude-code, codex; When you need to orchestrate multiple code generation or modification tasks concurrently across different platforms. ### When should I avoid concierge? Avoid if you are working in environments that do not support Python or require SDK functionalities for languages other than Python. Not suitable for projects that are constrained by licenses outside the provided 'Other' license category, which may limit interoperability and contribution freedoms. ### When should I avoid paseo? If your workflow does not involve managing coding agents from desktop, mobile apps, and CLI interfaces When you prefer cloud-based orchestration without needing to set up a local daemon server ### Is concierge or paseo more popular on GitHub? paseo has more GitHub stars (17,619 vs 531). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints. ### Are concierge and paseo open source? Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (concierge: Other, paseo: Other). ### Where can I find alternatives to concierge or paseo? GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [concierge alternatives](/tools/concierge-hq-concierge/alternatives) and [paseo alternatives](/tools/getpaseo-paseo/alternatives) ([concierge markdown twin](/tools/concierge-hq-concierge/alternatives.md), [paseo markdown twin](/tools/getpaseo-paseo/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes. ### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison? Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/concierge-hq-concierge-vs-getpaseo-paseo.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers. ### Which is better maintained, concierge or paseo? concierge: Slowing. paseo: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance. ### Where are the full trust reports for concierge and paseo? GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [concierge trust report](/tools/concierge-hq-concierge/trust); [paseo trust report](/tools/getpaseo-paseo/trust). --- **Machine-readable endpoints** - JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=concierge-hq-concierge`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=concierge-hq-concierge) - LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt) - Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt) _GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_