---
title: "deepeval vs lighteval"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/confident-ai-deepeval-vs-huggingface-lighteval"
tools: ["confident-ai-deepeval", "huggingface-lighteval"]
---

# deepeval vs lighteval

*GraphCanon updated Jul 12, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick deepeval when license: deepeval is Apache-2.0, lighteval is MIT; pick lighteval when license: lighteval is MIT, deepeval is Apache-2.0.

[deepeval](https://deepeval.com) reports 17k GitHub stars, 1.6k forks, and 334 open issues, last pushed Jul 10, 2026. [lighteval](https://huggingface.co/docs/lighteval/en/index) has 2.5k stars, 506 forks, and 347 open issues, last pushed Jun 29, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [deepeval's repository](https://github.com/confident-ai/deepeval) and [lighteval's repository](https://github.com/huggingface/lighteval).

| | [deepeval](/tools/confident-ai-deepeval.md) | [lighteval](/tools/huggingface-lighteval.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | The LLM Evaluation Framework | All-in-one toolkit for evaluating LLMs across multiple backends |
| Stars | 16,767 | 2,472 |
| Forks | 1,641 | 506 |
| Open issues | 334 | 347 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Adopt for | - | Lighteval is designed for evaluating language models across multiple backends. It integrates well with Hugging Face and provides a wide range of extras, making it particularly handy in non-Windows environments. |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Categories | LLM Frameworks, Evaluation & Observability | Evaluation & Observability |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [deepeval](/tools/confident-ai-deepeval.md) | [lighteval](/tools/huggingface-lighteval.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maintenance | Very active (96%) | Active (82%) |
| Days since push | 0d | 11d |
| Open issues (now) | 334 | 347 |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/confident-ai-deepeval/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/huggingface-lighteval/trust.md) |

## Decision facts: lighteval

- **Adopt for:** Lighteval is designed for evaluating language models across multiple backends. It integrates well with Hugging Face and provides a wide range of extras, making it particularly handy in non-Windows environments.

## Choose when

### Choose deepeval if…

- License: deepeval is Apache-2.0, lighteval is MIT.
- Tags unique to deepeval: llm-evaluation-framework, llm-evaluation-metrics, llm-evaluation.
- Also covers LLM Frameworks.

### Choose lighteval if…

- License: lighteval is MIT, deepeval is Apache-2.0.
- Tags unique to lighteval: evaluation, huggingface.
- When you need to evaluate the performance of various LLMs on different backend infrastructures, especially if you are working within Mac/Linux environments.

## When NOT to use deepeval

- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
- Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers.

## When NOT to use lighteval

- Avoid Lighteval for evaluations on Windows systems as it is currently untested and not supported there.
- Should you require a solution that does not integrate with or depend on the Hugging Face ecosystem, Lighteval might not fulfill your needs.

## Common questions

### What is the difference between deepeval and lighteval?

deepeval: The LLM Evaluation Framework. lighteval: All-in-one toolkit for evaluating LLMs across multiple backends. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose deepeval over lighteval?

Choose deepeval over lighteval when License: deepeval is Apache-2.0, lighteval is MIT; Tags unique to deepeval: llm-evaluation-framework, llm-evaluation-metrics, llm-evaluation; Also covers LLM Frameworks.

### When should I choose lighteval over deepeval?

Choose lighteval over deepeval when License: lighteval is MIT, deepeval is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to lighteval: evaluation, huggingface; When you need to evaluate the performance of various LLMs on different backend infrastructures, especially if you are working within Mac/Linux environments.

### When should I avoid deepeval?

LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers.

### When should I avoid lighteval?

Avoid Lighteval for evaluations on Windows systems as it is currently untested and not supported there. Should you require a solution that does not integrate with or depend on the Hugging Face ecosystem, Lighteval might not fulfill your needs.

### Is deepeval or lighteval more popular on GitHub?

deepeval has more GitHub stars (16,767 vs 2,472). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are deepeval and lighteval open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (deepeval: Apache-2.0, lighteval: MIT).

### Where can I find alternatives to deepeval or lighteval?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [deepeval alternatives](/tools/confident-ai-deepeval/alternatives) and [lighteval alternatives](/tools/huggingface-lighteval/alternatives) ([deepeval markdown twin](/tools/confident-ai-deepeval/alternatives.md), [lighteval markdown twin](/tools/huggingface-lighteval/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/confident-ai-deepeval-vs-huggingface-lighteval.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, deepeval or lighteval?

deepeval: Very active. lighteval: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for deepeval and lighteval?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [deepeval trust report](/tools/confident-ai-deepeval/trust); [lighteval trust report](/tools/huggingface-lighteval/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=confident-ai-deepeval`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=confident-ai-deepeval)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
