---
title: "awesome-llms-fine-tuning vs P-tuning-v2"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/curated-awesome-lists-awesome-llms-fine-tuning-vs-thudm-p-tuning-v2"
tools: ["curated-awesome-lists-awesome-llms-fine-tuning", "thudm-p-tuning-v2"]
---

# awesome-llms-fine-tuning vs P-tuning-v2

*GraphCanon updated Aug 24, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick awesome-llms-fine-tuning if a curated list for LLM fine-tuning resources including tutorials, papers, and tools; pick P-tuning-v2 if p-tuning-v2 is an optimized deep prompt tuning strategy that can be used for tasks like natural language processing and parameter-efficient learning where few parameters need to be adjusted compared to full fine-tuning.

[awesome-llms-fine-tuning](https://github.com/Curated-Awesome-Lists/awesome-llms-fine-tuning) reports 525 GitHub stars, 79 forks, and 10 open issues, last pushed Dec 2, 2024. [P-tuning-v2](https://github.com/THUDM/P-tuning-v2) has 2.1k stars, 213 forks, and 35 open issues, last pushed Nov 16, 2023. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [awesome-llms-fine-tuning's repository](https://github.com/Curated-Awesome-Lists/awesome-llms-fine-tuning) and [P-tuning-v2's repository](https://github.com/THUDM/P-tuning-v2).

| | [awesome-llms-fine-tuning](/tools/curated-awesome-lists-awesome-llms-fine-tuning.md) | [P-tuning-v2](/tools/thudm-p-tuning-v2.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | A comprehensive collection of resources for fine-tuning Large Language Models. | Optimized deep prompt tuning strategy comparable to fine-tuning across scales and tasks |
| Stars | 525 | 2,077 |
| Forks | 79 | 213 |
| Open issues | 10 | 35 |
| Language | - | Python |
| Adopt for | A curated list for LLM fine-tuning resources including tutorials, papers, and tools. | P-tuning-v2 is an optimized deep prompt tuning strategy that can be used for tasks like natural language processing and parameter-efficient learning where few parameters need to be adjusted compared to full fine-tuning. |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | (unknown) - (unknown) | P-tuning-v2 is provided under the Apache-2.0 license which permits free use, modification and distribution as long as copyright and license notice are preserved. |
| Categories | LLM Frameworks, Model Training | Model Training |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [awesome-llms-fine-tuning](/tools/curated-awesome-lists-awesome-llms-fine-tuning.md) | [P-tuning-v2](/tools/thudm-p-tuning-v2.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Days since push | 629d | 990d |
| Open issues (now) | 10 | 35 |
| Stars delta | 0 (30d) | Unknown |
| Open issues delta | +1 (30d) | Unknown |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/curated-awesome-lists-awesome-llms-fine-tuning/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/thudm-p-tuning-v2/trust.md) |

## Decision facts: awesome-llms-fine-tuning

- **Adopt for:** A curated list for LLM fine-tuning resources including tutorials, papers, and tools.
- **License detail:** (unknown) - (unknown)

## Decision facts: P-tuning-v2

- **Requirements:** Min 8 GB RAM; Experiments were conducted on NVIDIA DGX-A100; however, RTX 3090 or RTX 2080 Ti GPUs can suffice given certain conditions.; CUDA version should be at least 11.1 and specific versions of pytorch (1.7.1), torchvision (0.8.2) and torchaudio (0.7.2).; A conda environment setup with Python 3.8.5 is recommended for optimal performance.
- **Adopt for:** P-tuning-v2 is an optimized deep prompt tuning strategy that can be used for tasks like natural language processing and parameter-efficient learning where few parameters need to be adjusted compared to full fine-tuning.
- **License detail:** P-tuning-v2 is provided under the Apache-2.0 license which permits free use, modification and distribution as long as copyright and license notice are preserved.

## Choose when

### Choose awesome-llms-fine-tuning if…

- Tags unique to awesome-llms-fine-tuning: ai, awesome-list, deep-learning, fine-tuning.
- Also covers LLM Frameworks.
- Need extensive guidance on LLM-specific fine-tuning strategies

### Choose P-tuning-v2 if…

- Requirements: Min 8 GB RAM; Experiments were conducted on NVIDIA DGX-A100; however, RTX 3090 or RTX 2080 Ti GPUs can suffice given certain conditions.; CUDA version should be at least 11.1 and specific versions of pytorch (1.7.1), torchvision (0.8.2) and torchaudio (0.7.2).; A conda environment setup with Python 3.8.5 is recommended for optimal performance..
- Tags unique to P-tuning-v2: natural-language-processing, p-tuning, parameter-efficient-learning, pretrained-language-model.
- For scenarios requiring efficient use of resources, as P-tuning v2 requires fewer parameters than traditional fine-tuning methods.

## When NOT to use awesome-llms-fine-tuning

- Looking for real-time interactive support or direct code implementation help
- Favor more specialized tools for immediate performance optimization over broad learning

## When NOT to use P-tuning-v2

- Avoid using P-tuning v2 when you have large-scale datasets and model architectures, as it might not be as effective compared to full fine-tuning methods.
- If your project requires a high level of customization beyond prompt tuning or continuous prompts do not align with the problem complexity.

## Common questions

### What is the difference between awesome-llms-fine-tuning and P-tuning-v2?

awesome-llms-fine-tuning: A comprehensive collection of resources for fine-tuning Large Language Models.. P-tuning-v2: Optimized deep prompt tuning strategy comparable to fine-tuning across scales and tasks. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose awesome-llms-fine-tuning over P-tuning-v2?

Choose awesome-llms-fine-tuning over P-tuning-v2 when Tags unique to awesome-llms-fine-tuning: ai, awesome-list, deep-learning, fine-tuning; Also covers LLM Frameworks; Need extensive guidance on LLM-specific fine-tuning strategies.

### When should I choose P-tuning-v2 over awesome-llms-fine-tuning?

Choose P-tuning-v2 over awesome-llms-fine-tuning when Requirements: Min 8 GB RAM; Experiments were conducted on NVIDIA DGX-A100; however, RTX 3090 or RTX 2080 Ti GPUs can suffice given certain conditions.; CUDA version should be at least 11.1 and specific versions of pytorch (1.7.1), torchvision (0.8.2) and torchaudio (0.7.2).; A conda environment setup with Python 3.8.5 is recommended for optimal performance.; Tags unique to P-tuning-v2: natural-language-processing, p-tuning, parameter-efficient-learning, pretrained-language-model; For scenarios requiring efficient use of resources, as P-tuning v2 requires fewer parameters than traditional fine-tuning methods.

### When should I avoid awesome-llms-fine-tuning?

Looking for real-time interactive support or direct code implementation help Favor more specialized tools for immediate performance optimization over broad learning

### When should I avoid P-tuning-v2?

Avoid using P-tuning v2 when you have large-scale datasets and model architectures, as it might not be as effective compared to full fine-tuning methods. If your project requires a high level of customization beyond prompt tuning or continuous prompts do not align with the problem complexity.

### Is awesome-llms-fine-tuning or P-tuning-v2 more popular on GitHub?

P-tuning-v2 has more GitHub stars (2,077 vs 525). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are awesome-llms-fine-tuning and P-tuning-v2 open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub.

### Where can I find alternatives to awesome-llms-fine-tuning or P-tuning-v2?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [awesome-llms-fine-tuning alternatives](/tools/curated-awesome-lists-awesome-llms-fine-tuning/alternatives) and [P-tuning-v2 alternatives](/tools/thudm-p-tuning-v2/alternatives) ([awesome-llms-fine-tuning markdown twin](/tools/curated-awesome-lists-awesome-llms-fine-tuning/alternatives.md), [P-tuning-v2 markdown twin](/tools/thudm-p-tuning-v2/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/curated-awesome-lists-awesome-llms-fine-tuning-vs-thudm-p-tuning-v2.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, awesome-llms-fine-tuning or P-tuning-v2?

awesome-llms-fine-tuning: Dormant. P-tuning-v2: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for awesome-llms-fine-tuning and P-tuning-v2?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [awesome-llms-fine-tuning trust report](/tools/curated-awesome-lists-awesome-llms-fine-tuning/trust); [P-tuning-v2 trust report](/tools/thudm-p-tuning-v2/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=curated-awesome-lists-awesome-llms-fine-tuning`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=curated-awesome-lists-awesome-llms-fine-tuning)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
