---
title: "LibreChat vs awesome-chatgpt"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/danny-avila-librechat-vs-humanloop-awesome-chatgpt"
tools: ["danny-avila-librechat", "humanloop-awesome-chatgpt"]
---

# LibreChat vs awesome-chatgpt

*GraphCanon updated Jul 12, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick LibreChat if libreChat provides a versatile AI chat platform for self-hosting with extensive features like model switching, code interpretation, and secure multi-user authentication; pick awesome-chatgpt if awesome ChatGPT offers a curated list of tools, demos, documentation, and community resources for developers and enthusiasts to interact with the ChatGPT model and GPT-3 through various unofficial APIs, Chrome extensions.

[LibreChat](https://librechat.ai/) reports 41k GitHub stars, 8.3k forks, and 573 open issues, last pushed Jul 10, 2026. [awesome-chatgpt](https://github.com/humanloop/awesome-chatgpt) has 8.2k stars, 552 forks, and 141 open issues, last pushed Oct 15, 2025. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [LibreChat's repository](https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat) and [awesome-chatgpt's repository](https://github.com/humanloop/awesome-chatgpt).

| | [LibreChat](/tools/danny-avila-librechat.md) | [awesome-chatgpt](/tools/humanloop-awesome-chatgpt.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | Enhanced ChatGPT Clone with extensive features and integrations for self-hosting | Curated list of resources for ChatGPT and GPT-3 from OpenAI |
| Stars | 40,571 | 8,209 |
| Forks | 8,331 | 552 |
| Open issues | 573 | 141 |
| Language | TypeScript | - |
| Adopt for | LibreChat provides a versatile AI chat platform for self-hosting with extensive features like model switching, code interpretation, and secure multi-user authentication. | Awesome ChatGPT offers a curated list of tools, demos, documentation, and community resources for developers and enthusiasts to interact with the ChatGPT model and GPT-3 through various unofficial APIs, Chrome extensions |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | MIT | - |
| Categories | AI Agents, Data & Retrieval, Developer Tools, Evaluation & Observability, Inference & Serving, Model Training | Developer Tools, Inference & Serving |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [LibreChat](/tools/danny-avila-librechat.md) | [awesome-chatgpt](/tools/humanloop-awesome-chatgpt.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maintenance | Very active (96%) | Slowing (36%) |
| Days since push | 0d | 269d |
| Open issues (now) | 573 | 141 |
| Owner type | User | Organization |
| Security scan | No MCP manifest | No lockfile |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/danny-avila-librechat/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/humanloop-awesome-chatgpt/trust.md) |

## Decision facts: LibreChat

- **Adopt for:** LibreChat provides a versatile AI chat platform for self-hosting with extensive features like model switching, code interpretation, and secure multi-user authentication.

## Decision facts: awesome-chatgpt

- **Adopt for:** Awesome ChatGPT offers a curated list of tools, demos, documentation, and community resources for developers and enthusiasts to interact with the ChatGPT model and GPT-3 through various unofficial APIs, Chrome extensions

## Choose when

### Choose LibreChat if…

- Tags unique to LibreChat: ai, anthropic, artifacts, aws.
- Also covers AI Agents, Data & Retrieval, Evaluation & Observability, Model Training.
- LibreChat ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- Need to support multiple AI models and protocols in one tool

### Choose awesome-chatgpt if…

- Tags unique to awesome-chatgpt: chatgpt, chrome-extension, cross-platform-access, gpt-3.
- You need access to multiple unofficial APIs in different programming languages such as Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Go, Dart, allowing broader integration options.
- Leaner open-issue backlog (141).

## When NOT to use LibreChat

- Looking for a simpler solution with fewer configurability options
- Do not require extensive third-party service integrations or complex customizations

## When NOT to use awesome-chatgpt

- If you require a fully official SDK or API provided by OpenAI due to compliance requirements, since Awesome ChatGPT primarily features unofficial tools.
- You're looking for direct integrations with enterprise platforms like Slack/Discord bots which may be insufficiently supported in your specific business environment or not meet security standards.

## Common questions

### What is the difference between LibreChat and awesome-chatgpt?

LibreChat: Enhanced ChatGPT Clone with extensive features and integrations for self-hosting. awesome-chatgpt: Curated list of resources for ChatGPT and GPT-3 from OpenAI. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose LibreChat over awesome-chatgpt?

Choose LibreChat over awesome-chatgpt when Tags unique to LibreChat: ai, anthropic, artifacts, aws; Also covers AI Agents, Data & Retrieval, Evaluation & Observability, Model Training; LibreChat ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; Need to support multiple AI models and protocols in one tool.

### When should I choose awesome-chatgpt over LibreChat?

Choose awesome-chatgpt over LibreChat when Tags unique to awesome-chatgpt: chatgpt, chrome-extension, cross-platform-access, gpt-3; You need access to multiple unofficial APIs in different programming languages such as Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Go, Dart, allowing broader integration options; Leaner open-issue backlog (141).

### When should I avoid LibreChat?

Looking for a simpler solution with fewer configurability options Do not require extensive third-party service integrations or complex customizations

### When should I avoid awesome-chatgpt?

If you require a fully official SDK or API provided by OpenAI due to compliance requirements, since Awesome ChatGPT primarily features unofficial tools. You're looking for direct integrations with enterprise platforms like Slack/Discord bots which may be insufficiently supported in your specific business environment or not meet security standards.

### Is LibreChat or awesome-chatgpt more popular on GitHub?

LibreChat has more GitHub stars (40,571 vs 8,209). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are LibreChat and awesome-chatgpt open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub.

### Where can I find alternatives to LibreChat or awesome-chatgpt?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [LibreChat alternatives](/tools/danny-avila-librechat/alternatives) and [awesome-chatgpt alternatives](/tools/humanloop-awesome-chatgpt/alternatives) ([LibreChat markdown twin](/tools/danny-avila-librechat/alternatives.md), [awesome-chatgpt markdown twin](/tools/humanloop-awesome-chatgpt/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/danny-avila-librechat-vs-humanloop-awesome-chatgpt.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, LibreChat or awesome-chatgpt?

LibreChat: Very active. awesome-chatgpt: Slowing. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for LibreChat and awesome-chatgpt?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [LibreChat trust report](/tools/danny-avila-librechat/trust); [awesome-chatgpt trust report](/tools/humanloop-awesome-chatgpt/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=danny-avila-librechat`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=danny-avila-librechat)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
