---
title: "LibreChat vs zeno"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/danny-avila-librechat-vs-zeno-ml-zeno"
tools: ["danny-avila-librechat", "zeno-ml-zeno"]
---

# LibreChat vs zeno

*GraphCanon updated Jul 11, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick LibreChat when libreChat is primarily TypeScript; zeno is Svelte; pick zeno when zeno is primarily Svelte; LibreChat is TypeScript.

[LibreChat](https://librechat.ai/) reports 41k GitHub stars, 8.3k forks, and 573 open issues, last pushed Jul 10, 2026. [zeno](https://zenoml.com) has 214 stars, 11 forks, and 45 open issues, last pushed Oct 5, 2023. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [LibreChat's repository](https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat) and [zeno's repository](https://github.com/zeno-ml/zeno).

| | [LibreChat](/tools/danny-avila-librechat.md) | [zeno](/tools/zeno-ml-zeno.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | Enhanced ChatGPT Clone: Features Agents, MCP, Skills, DeepSeek, Anthropic, AWS, OpenAI, Responses API, Azure, Groq, o1, GPT-5, Mistral, OpenRouter, Vertex AI, Gemini, Artifacts, AI model switching, me | AI Data Management & Evaluation Platform |
| Stars | 40,571 | 214 |
| Forks | 8,331 | 11 |
| Open issues | 573 | 45 |
| Language | TypeScript | Svelte |
| Adopt for | - | - |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Categories | AI Agents, LLM Frameworks, Computer Vision | LLM Frameworks, Speech & Audio, Computer Vision |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [LibreChat](/tools/danny-avila-librechat.md) | [zeno](/tools/zeno-ml-zeno.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maintenance | Very active (96%) | Archived (8%) |
| Days since push | 0d | 1010d |
| Archived on GitHub | No | Yes |
| Open issues (now) | 573 | 45 |
| Owner type | User | Organization |
| Security scan | No MCP manifest | 58 low (58 low) |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/danny-avila-librechat/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/zeno-ml-zeno/trust.md) |

## Choose when

### Choose LibreChat if…

- LibreChat is primarily TypeScript; zeno is Svelte.
- Tags unique to LibreChat: chatgpt-clone, artifacts, aws, chatgpt.
- Also covers AI Agents.

### Choose zeno if…

- zeno is primarily Svelte; LibreChat is TypeScript.
- Tags unique to zeno: svelte, data-science, evaluation, machine-learning.
- Also covers Speech & Audio.

## When NOT to use LibreChat

- AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.

## When NOT to use zeno

- zeno is archived on GitHub. Prefer an active alternative unless you maintain a private fork or need a frozen dependency.
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.

## Common questions

### What is the difference between LibreChat and zeno?

LibreChat: Enhanced ChatGPT Clone: Features Agents, MCP, Skills, DeepSeek, Anthropic, AWS, OpenAI, Responses API, Azure, Groq, o1, GPT-5, Mistral, OpenRouter, Vertex AI, Gemini, Artifacts, AI model switching, me. zeno: AI Data Management & Evaluation Platform. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose LibreChat over zeno?

Choose LibreChat over zeno when LibreChat is primarily TypeScript; zeno is Svelte; Tags unique to LibreChat: chatgpt-clone, artifacts, aws, chatgpt; Also covers AI Agents.

### When should I choose zeno over LibreChat?

Choose zeno over LibreChat when zeno is primarily Svelte; LibreChat is TypeScript; Tags unique to zeno: svelte, data-science, evaluation, machine-learning; Also covers Speech & Audio.

### When should I avoid LibreChat?

AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.

### When should I avoid zeno?

zeno is archived on GitHub. Prefer an active alternative unless you maintain a private fork or need a frozen dependency. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.

### Is LibreChat or zeno more popular on GitHub?

LibreChat has more GitHub stars (40,571 vs 214). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are LibreChat and zeno open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (LibreChat: MIT, zeno: MIT).

### Where can I find alternatives to LibreChat or zeno?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [LibreChat alternatives](/tools/danny-avila-librechat/alternatives) and [zeno alternatives](/tools/zeno-ml-zeno/alternatives) ([LibreChat markdown twin](/tools/danny-avila-librechat/alternatives.md), [zeno markdown twin](/tools/zeno-ml-zeno/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/danny-avila-librechat-vs-zeno-ml-zeno.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, LibreChat or zeno?

LibreChat: Very active. zeno: Archived. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for LibreChat and zeno?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [LibreChat trust report](/tools/danny-avila-librechat/trust); [zeno trust report](/tools/zeno-ml-zeno/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=danny-avila-librechat`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=danny-avila-librechat)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
