--- title: "9router vs auto-evaluator" type: "comparison" canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/decolua-9router-vs-langchain-ai-auto-evaluator" tools: ["decolua-9router", "langchain-ai-auto-evaluator"] --- # 9router vs auto-evaluator *GraphCanon updated Jul 11, 2026* ## Verdict Pick 9router when 9router is primarily JavaScript; auto-evaluator is TypeScript; pick auto-evaluator when auto-evaluator is primarily TypeScript; 9router is JavaScript. [9router](https://9router.com) reports 22k GitHub stars, 3.7k forks, and 1.1k open issues, last pushed Jul 10, 2026. [auto-evaluator](https://autoevaluator.langchain.com/) has 782 stars, 103 forks, and 21 open issues, last pushed Jun 26, 2025. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [9router's repository](https://github.com/decolua/9router) and [auto-evaluator's repository](https://github.com/langchain-ai/auto-evaluator). | | [9router](/tools/decolua-9router.md) | [auto-evaluator](/tools/langchain-ai-auto-evaluator.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Tagline | Unlimited FREE AI coding with auto-fallback and token savings | auto-evaluator | | Stars | 21,698 | 782 | | Forks | 3,655 | 103 | | Open issues | 1,111 | 21 | | Language | JavaScript | TypeScript | | Adopt for | 9router is a gateway service that connects multiple coding AI agents with free providers, providing token savings through RTK and offering unlimited free access to certain AI models. | - | | Persona | - | - | | Runtime | - | - | | License | MIT | Other | | Categories | AI Agents, Inference & Serving | Inference & Serving | ## Trust and health _Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._ | | [9router](/tools/decolua-9router.md) | [auto-evaluator](/tools/langchain-ai-auto-evaluator.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Maintenance | Very active (96%) | Archived (8%) | | Days since push | 1d | 380d | | Archived on GitHub | No | Yes | | Open issues (now) | 1.1k | 21 | | Owner type | User | Organization | | Full report | [trust report](/tools/decolua-9router/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/langchain-ai-auto-evaluator/trust.md) | ## Decision facts: 9router - **Pricing:** unknown - Offers a 'TOKEN SAVER' tier with built-in RTK for FREE, which saves up to 40% on tokens. Also supports connections to completely FREE providers like Kiro AI and OpenCode Free without any sign-up or on - **Adopt for:** 9router is a gateway service that connects multiple coding AI agents with free providers, providing token savings through RTK and offering unlimited free access to certain AI models. ## Choose when ### Choose 9router if… - 9router is primarily JavaScript; auto-evaluator is TypeScript. - License: 9router is MIT, auto-evaluator is Other. - Pricing: Offers a 'TOKEN SAVER' tier with built-in RTK for FREE, which saves up to 40% on tokens. Also supports connections to completely FREE providers like Kiro AI and OpenCode Free without any sign-up or on. - Tags unique to 9router: token-saver, free-ai, openai-proxy, ai-agents. - Also covers AI Agents. - 9router ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment. - Use when you need to connect to various coding AI agents like Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Cline, Copilot, and others via a unified gateway. ### Choose auto-evaluator if… - auto-evaluator is primarily TypeScript; 9router is JavaScript. - License: auto-evaluator is Other, 9router is MIT. - Tags unique to auto-evaluator: typescript. ## When NOT to use 9router - Not suitable if you specifically need advanced or high-priority services from premium providers like Claude Code Pro/Max or Codex Plus/Pro, which offer dedicated support and higher limits. - Avoid using this tool if your coding requirements exceed the capabilities of free models connected via 9router's gateway service. ## When NOT to use auto-evaluator - auto-evaluator is archived on GitHub. Prefer an active alternative unless you maintain a private fork or need a frozen dependency. - Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic. ## Common questions ### What is the difference between 9router and auto-evaluator? 9router: Unlimited FREE AI coding with auto-fallback and token savings. auto-evaluator: auto-evaluator. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories. ### When should I choose 9router over auto-evaluator? Choose 9router over auto-evaluator when 9router is primarily JavaScript; auto-evaluator is TypeScript; License: 9router is MIT, auto-evaluator is Other; Pricing: Offers a 'TOKEN SAVER' tier with built-in RTK for FREE, which saves up to 40% on tokens. Also supports connections to completely FREE providers like Kiro AI and OpenCode Free without any sign-up or on; Tags unique to 9router: token-saver, free-ai, openai-proxy, ai-agents; Also covers AI Agents; 9router ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; Use when you need to connect to various coding AI agents like Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Cline, Copilot, and others via a unified gateway. ### When should I choose auto-evaluator over 9router? Choose auto-evaluator over 9router when auto-evaluator is primarily TypeScript; 9router is JavaScript; License: auto-evaluator is Other, 9router is MIT; Tags unique to auto-evaluator: typescript. ### When should I avoid 9router? Not suitable if you specifically need advanced or high-priority services from premium providers like Claude Code Pro/Max or Codex Plus/Pro, which offer dedicated support and higher limits. Avoid using this tool if your coding requirements exceed the capabilities of free models connected via 9router's gateway service. ### When should I avoid auto-evaluator? auto-evaluator is archived on GitHub. Prefer an active alternative unless you maintain a private fork or need a frozen dependency. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic. ### Is 9router or auto-evaluator more popular on GitHub? 9router has more GitHub stars (21,698 vs 782). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints. ### Are 9router and auto-evaluator open source? Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (9router: MIT, auto-evaluator: Other). ### Where can I find alternatives to 9router or auto-evaluator? GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [9router alternatives](/tools/decolua-9router/alternatives) and [auto-evaluator alternatives](/tools/langchain-ai-auto-evaluator/alternatives) ([9router markdown twin](/tools/decolua-9router/alternatives.md), [auto-evaluator markdown twin](/tools/langchain-ai-auto-evaluator/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes. ### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison? Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/decolua-9router-vs-langchain-ai-auto-evaluator.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers. ### Which is better maintained, 9router or auto-evaluator? 9router: Very active. auto-evaluator: Archived. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance. ### Where are the full trust reports for 9router and auto-evaluator? GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [9router trust report](/tools/decolua-9router/trust); [auto-evaluator trust report](/tools/langchain-ai-auto-evaluator/trust). --- **Machine-readable endpoints** - JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=decolua-9router`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=decolua-9router) - LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt) - Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt) _GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_