---
title: "DeepSeek-R1 vs llm-action"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/deepseek-ai-deepseek-r1-vs-liguodongiot-llm-action"
tools: ["deepseek-ai-deepseek-r1", "liguodongiot-llm-action"]
---

# DeepSeek-R1 vs llm-action

*GraphCanon updated Aug 16, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick DeepSeek-R1 if deepSeek-R1 provides a set of distilled LLMs from Qwen and LLaMA series that support commercial use; pick llm-action if llm-action aims to share large model technology principles and practical experiences covering areas such as engineering, deployment, inference, serving, and training.

[DeepSeek-R1](https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1) reports 92k GitHub stars, 12k forks, and 38 open issues, last pushed Jun 27, 2025. [llm-action](https://www.zhihu.com/column/c_1456193767213043713) has 25k stars, 2.8k forks, and 19 open issues, last pushed Jul 19, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [DeepSeek-R1's repository](https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1) and [llm-action's repository](https://github.com/liguodongiot/llm-action).

| | [DeepSeek-R1](/tools/deepseek-ai-deepseek-r1.md) | [llm-action](/tools/liguodongiot-llm-action.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | Repository contains distilled LLM models derived from Qwen and LLaMA series for various commercial uses. | Aims to share large model technology principles and practical experience (large model engineering, application implementation) |
| Stars | 91,982 | 24,898 |
| Forks | 11,706 | 2,842 |
| Open issues | 38 | 19 |
| Language | - | HTML |
| Adopt for | DeepSeek-R1 provides a set of distilled LLMs from Qwen and LLaMA series that support commercial use. | llm-action aims to share large model technology principles and practical experiences covering areas such as engineering, deployment, inference, serving, and training. |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | MIT | llm-action is open-source under the Apache-2.0 license. |
| Categories | LLM Frameworks, Model Training | Inference & Serving, LLM Frameworks, Model Training |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [DeepSeek-R1](/tools/deepseek-ai-deepseek-r1.md) | [llm-action](/tools/liguodongiot-llm-action.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maintenance | Dormant (18%) | Active (82%) |
| Days since push | 405d | 28d |
| Open issues (now) | 38 | 19 |
| Stars delta | Unknown | +162 (30d) |
| Open issues delta | Unknown | +1 (30d) |
| Owner type | Organization | User |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/deepseek-ai-deepseek-r1/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/liguodongiot-llm-action/trust.md) |

## Decision facts: DeepSeek-R1

- **Pricing:** freemium - The repository allows for commercial use under the MIT License or respective original licenses with no explicit monetary costs outlined in the repository.
- **Requirements:** Min 4 GB RAM; This is a rough estimate based on common model requirements. Specific models within DeepSeek-R1 may have different resource needs.
- **Adopt for:** DeepSeek-R1 provides a set of distilled LLMs from Qwen and LLaMA series that support commercial use.

## Decision facts: llm-action

- **Adopt for:** llm-action aims to share large model technology principles and practical experiences covering areas such as engineering, deployment, inference, serving, and training.
- **License detail:** llm-action is open-source under the Apache-2.0 license.

## Choose when

### Choose DeepSeek-R1 if…

- License: DeepSeek-R1 is MIT, llm-action is Apache-2.0.
- Pricing: The repository allows for commercial use under the MIT License or respective original licenses with no explicit monetary costs outlined in the repository..
- Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; This is a rough estimate based on common model requirements. Specific models within DeepSeek-R1 may have different resource needs..
- Tags unique to DeepSeek-R1: commercial use, derived models, distilled models, mit-license.
- When you need to work with pre-trained models derived specifically from the Qwen-2.5 and Llama3.x series, benefiting from their unique characteristics.

### Choose llm-action if…

- License: llm-action is Apache-2.0, DeepSeek-R1 is MIT.
- Tags unique to llm-action: deployment, engineering, inference, large model.
- Also covers Inference & Serving.
- - When you need detailed examples and best practices of implementing large language models (LLMs) in real-world applications, llm-action provides insights into the challenges faced during LLM's actual

## When NOT to use DeepSeek-R1

- Avoid if you need foundational models rather than distilled versions, as DeepSeek-R1 specializes in providing smaller, more efficient models suitable for resource-constrained environments.
- If your project is tightly regulated or requires models from a different lineage, as DeepSeek-R1 exclusively provides derivatives of Qwen and LLaMA series.

## When NOT to use llm-action

- - If your focus is narrowly on cutting-edge research rather than practical implementation details, llm-action may not be the best resource as it focuses more on deployment processes.
- - When looking for a full-stack solution that includes detailed code implementations and libraries for each phase (training, serving), llm-action might fall short. It shines in sharing knowledge but

## Common questions

### What is the difference between DeepSeek-R1 and llm-action?

DeepSeek-R1: Repository contains distilled LLM models derived from Qwen and LLaMA series for various commercial uses.. llm-action: Aims to share large model technology principles and practical experience (large model engineering, application implementation). See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose DeepSeek-R1 over llm-action?

Choose DeepSeek-R1 over llm-action when License: DeepSeek-R1 is MIT, llm-action is Apache-2.0; Pricing: The repository allows for commercial use under the MIT License or respective original licenses with no explicit monetary costs outlined in the repository.; Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; This is a rough estimate based on common model requirements. Specific models within DeepSeek-R1 may have different resource needs.; Tags unique to DeepSeek-R1: commercial use, derived models, distilled models, mit-license; When you need to work with pre-trained models derived specifically from the Qwen-2.5 and Llama3.x series, benefiting from their unique characteristics.

### When should I choose llm-action over DeepSeek-R1?

Choose llm-action over DeepSeek-R1 when License: llm-action is Apache-2.0, DeepSeek-R1 is MIT; Tags unique to llm-action: deployment, engineering, inference, large model; Also covers Inference & Serving; - When you need detailed examples and best practices of implementing large language models (LLMs) in real-world applications, llm-action provides insights into the challenges faced during LLM's actual.

### When should I avoid DeepSeek-R1?

Avoid if you need foundational models rather than distilled versions, as DeepSeek-R1 specializes in providing smaller, more efficient models suitable for resource-constrained environments. If your project is tightly regulated or requires models from a different lineage, as DeepSeek-R1 exclusively provides derivatives of Qwen and LLaMA series.

### When should I avoid llm-action?

- If your focus is narrowly on cutting-edge research rather than practical implementation details, llm-action may not be the best resource as it focuses more on deployment processes. - When looking for a full-stack solution that includes detailed code implementations and libraries for each phase (training, serving), llm-action might fall short. It shines in sharing knowledge but

### Is DeepSeek-R1 or llm-action more popular on GitHub?

DeepSeek-R1 has more GitHub stars (91,982 vs 24,898). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are DeepSeek-R1 and llm-action open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (DeepSeek-R1: MIT, llm-action: Apache-2.0).

### Where can I find alternatives to DeepSeek-R1 or llm-action?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [DeepSeek-R1 alternatives](/tools/deepseek-ai-deepseek-r1/alternatives) and [llm-action alternatives](/tools/liguodongiot-llm-action/alternatives) ([DeepSeek-R1 markdown twin](/tools/deepseek-ai-deepseek-r1/alternatives.md), [llm-action markdown twin](/tools/liguodongiot-llm-action/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/deepseek-ai-deepseek-r1-vs-liguodongiot-llm-action.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, DeepSeek-R1 or llm-action?

DeepSeek-R1: Dormant. llm-action: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for DeepSeek-R1 and llm-action?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [DeepSeek-R1 trust report](/tools/deepseek-ai-deepseek-r1/trust); [llm-action trust report](/tools/liguodongiot-llm-action/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=deepseek-ai-deepseek-r1`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=deepseek-ai-deepseek-r1)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
