--- title: "DeepSeek-R1 vs human-eval" type: "comparison" canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/deepseek-ai-deepseek-r1-vs-openai-human-eval" tools: ["deepseek-ai-deepseek-r1", "openai-human-eval"] --- # DeepSeek-R1 vs human-eval *GraphCanon updated Jul 12, 2026* ## Verdict Pick DeepSeek-R1 when pricing: The repository allows for commercial use under the MIT License or respective original licenses with no explicit monetary costs outlined in the repository.; pick human-eval when tags unique to human-eval: python. [DeepSeek-R1](https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1) reports 92k GitHub stars, 12k forks, and 45 open issues, last pushed Jun 27, 2025. [human-eval](https://github.com/openai/human-eval) has 3.3k stars, 449 forks, and 42 open issues, last pushed Jan 17, 2025. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [DeepSeek-R1's repository](https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1) and [human-eval's repository](https://github.com/openai/human-eval). | | [DeepSeek-R1](/tools/deepseek-ai-deepseek-r1.md) | [human-eval](/tools/openai-human-eval.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Tagline | Repository contains distilled LLM models derived from Qwen and LLaMA series for various commercial uses. | Code for the paper "Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code" | | Stars | 91,991 | 3,294 | | Forks | 11,711 | 449 | | Open issues | 45 | 42 | | Language | - | Python | | Adopt for | DeepSeek-R1 provides a set of distilled LLMs from Qwen and LLaMA series that support commercial use. | - | | Persona | - | - | | Runtime | - | - | | License | MIT | MIT | | Categories | LLM Frameworks, Model Training | LLM Frameworks, Model Training, Evaluation & Observability | ## Trust and health _Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._ | | [DeepSeek-R1](/tools/deepseek-ai-deepseek-r1.md) | [human-eval](/tools/openai-human-eval.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Days since push | 379d | 540d | | Open issues (now) | 45 | 42 | | Security scan | No lockfile | No criticals | | Full report | [trust report](/tools/deepseek-ai-deepseek-r1/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/openai-human-eval/trust.md) | ## Decision facts: DeepSeek-R1 - **Pricing:** freemium - The repository allows for commercial use under the MIT License or respective original licenses with no explicit monetary costs outlined in the repository. - **Requirements:** Min 4 GB RAM; This is a rough estimate based on common model requirements. Specific models within DeepSeek-R1 may have different resource needs. - **Adopt for:** DeepSeek-R1 provides a set of distilled LLMs from Qwen and LLaMA series that support commercial use. ## Choose when ### Choose DeepSeek-R1 if… - Pricing: The repository allows for commercial use under the MIT License or respective original licenses with no explicit monetary costs outlined in the repository.. - Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; This is a rough estimate based on common model requirements. Specific models within DeepSeek-R1 may have different resource needs.. - Tags unique to DeepSeek-R1: derived models, mit license, distilled models, commercial use. - When you need to work with pre-trained models derived specifically from the Qwen-2.5 and Llama3.x series, benefiting from their unique characteristics. ### Choose human-eval if… - Tags unique to human-eval: python. - Also covers Evaluation & Observability. - Leaner open-issue backlog (42). ## When NOT to use DeepSeek-R1 - Avoid if you need foundational models rather than distilled versions, as DeepSeek-R1 specializes in providing smaller, more efficient models suitable for resource-constrained environments. - If your project is tightly regulated or requires models from a different lineage, as DeepSeek-R1 exclusively provides derivatives of Qwen and LLaMA series. ## When NOT to use human-eval - Last GitHub push was 540 days ago (dormant maintenance, Jan 17, 2025). Validate activity before betting a new project on human-eval. - LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. - Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge. - Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers. ## Common questions ### What is the difference between DeepSeek-R1 and human-eval? DeepSeek-R1: Repository contains distilled LLM models derived from Qwen and LLaMA series for various commercial uses.. human-eval: Code for the paper "Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code". See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories. ### When should I choose DeepSeek-R1 over human-eval? Choose DeepSeek-R1 over human-eval when Pricing: The repository allows for commercial use under the MIT License or respective original licenses with no explicit monetary costs outlined in the repository.; Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; This is a rough estimate based on common model requirements. Specific models within DeepSeek-R1 may have different resource needs.; Tags unique to DeepSeek-R1: derived models, mit license, distilled models, commercial use; When you need to work with pre-trained models derived specifically from the Qwen-2.5 and Llama3.x series, benefiting from their unique characteristics. ### When should I choose human-eval over DeepSeek-R1? Choose human-eval over DeepSeek-R1 when Tags unique to human-eval: python; Also covers Evaluation & Observability; Leaner open-issue backlog (42). ### When should I avoid DeepSeek-R1? Avoid if you need foundational models rather than distilled versions, as DeepSeek-R1 specializes in providing smaller, more efficient models suitable for resource-constrained environments. If your project is tightly regulated or requires models from a different lineage, as DeepSeek-R1 exclusively provides derivatives of Qwen and LLaMA series. ### When should I avoid human-eval? Last GitHub push was 540 days ago (dormant maintenance, Jan 17, 2025). Validate activity before betting a new project on human-eval. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge. Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers. ### Is DeepSeek-R1 or human-eval more popular on GitHub? DeepSeek-R1 has more GitHub stars (91,991 vs 3,294). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints. ### Are DeepSeek-R1 and human-eval open source? Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (DeepSeek-R1: MIT, human-eval: MIT). ### Where can I find alternatives to DeepSeek-R1 or human-eval? GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [DeepSeek-R1 alternatives](/tools/deepseek-ai-deepseek-r1/alternatives) and [human-eval alternatives](/tools/openai-human-eval/alternatives) ([DeepSeek-R1 markdown twin](/tools/deepseek-ai-deepseek-r1/alternatives.md), [human-eval markdown twin](/tools/openai-human-eval/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes. ### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison? Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/deepseek-ai-deepseek-r1-vs-openai-human-eval.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers. ### Which is better maintained, DeepSeek-R1 or human-eval? DeepSeek-R1: Dormant. human-eval: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance. ### Where are the full trust reports for DeepSeek-R1 and human-eval? GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [DeepSeek-R1 trust report](/tools/deepseek-ai-deepseek-r1/trust); [human-eval trust report](/tools/openai-human-eval/trust). --- **Machine-readable endpoints** - JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=deepseek-ai-deepseek-r1`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=deepseek-ai-deepseek-r1) - LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt) - Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt) _GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_