--- title: "obsidian-ava vs LLMFeeder" type: "comparison" canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/different-ai-obsidian-ava-vs-jatinkrmalik-llmfeeder" tools: ["different-ai-obsidian-ava", "jatinkrmalik-llmfeeder"] --- # obsidian-ava vs LLMFeeder *GraphCanon updated Aug 12, 2026* ## Verdict Pick obsidian-ava if obsidian-ava is a deprecated TypeScript project designed to assist with note formatting in Obsidian Notes through the integration of ChatGPT services; pick LLMFeeder if lLMFeeder simplifies preparing web content for AI models by converting it to Markdown with one click. [obsidian-ava](https://app.anotherai.co) reports 659 GitHub stars, 17 forks, and 26 open issues, last pushed Apr 17, 2024. [LLMFeeder](https://llmfeeder.fyi) has 451 stars, 54 forks, and 10 open issues, last pushed Aug 2, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [obsidian-ava's repository](https://github.com/different-ai/obsidian-ava) and [LLMFeeder's repository](https://github.com/jatinkrmalik/LLMFeeder). | | [obsidian-ava](/tools/different-ai-obsidian-ava.md) | [LLMFeeder](/tools/jatinkrmalik-llmfeeder.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Tagline | Deprecated AI assistant for Obsidian Notes based on ChatGPT | Browser extension for converting web pages to clean Markdown | | Stars | 659 | 451 | | Forks | 17 | 54 | | Open issues | 26 | 10 | | Language | TypeScript | JavaScript | | Adopt for | Obsidian-ava is a deprecated TypeScript project designed to assist with note formatting in Obsidian Notes through the integration of ChatGPT services. | LLMFeeder simplifies preparing web content for AI models by converting it to Markdown with one click. | | Persona | - | - | | Runtime | - | - | | License | Licensed under MIT license | MIT | | Categories | Developer Tools | Developer Tools, Model Training | ## Trust and health _Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._ | | [obsidian-ava](/tools/different-ai-obsidian-ava.md) | [LLMFeeder](/tools/jatinkrmalik-llmfeeder.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Maintenance | Dormant (18%) | Active (82%) | | Days since push | 834d | 9d | | Open issues (now) | 26 | 10 | | Owner type | Organization | User | | Full report | [trust report](/tools/different-ai-obsidian-ava/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/jatinkrmalik-llmfeeder/trust.md) | ## Decision facts: obsidian-ava - **Pricing:** freemium - Available for free but may require premium Obsidian plugins or a ChatGPT subscription - **Requirements:** Requires TypeScript and ChatGPT integration. Not supported on environments lacking these. - **Adopt for:** Obsidian-ava is a deprecated TypeScript project designed to assist with note formatting in Obsidian Notes through the integration of ChatGPT services. - **License detail:** Licensed under MIT license ## Decision facts: LLMFeeder - **Adopt for:** LLMFeeder simplifies preparing web content for AI models by converting it to Markdown with one click. ## Choose when ### Choose obsidian-ava if… - obsidian-ava is primarily TypeScript; LLMFeeder is JavaScript. - Pricing: Available for free but may require premium Obsidian plugins or a ChatGPT subscription. - Requirements: Requires TypeScript and ChatGPT integration. Not supported on environments lacking these.. - Tags unique to obsidian-ava: computer-vision, deep-learning, knowledge-management, language-model. - If you have legacy configurations relying on obsidian-ava's specific implementation for integrating AI into Obsidian notes, despite its deprecation status. ### Choose LLMFeeder if… - LLMFeeder is primarily JavaScript; obsidian-ava is TypeScript. - Tags unique to LLMFeeder: automation, browser-extension, llm, markdown. - Also covers Model Training. - When you need quick, clean markdown from webpages for use in AI language models ## When NOT to use obsidian-ava - When seeking active development or support since the project is deprecated and not maintained anymore. - If you require a more recent tool with updated features, use [File Organizer 2000](https://github.com/different-ai/file-organizer-2000) instead. ## When NOT to use LLMFeeder - For pages needing complex formatting retention since Markdown conversion strips style - If real-time interaction with webpage content is required post-conversion, as it copies plain text only ## Common questions ### What is the difference between obsidian-ava and LLMFeeder? obsidian-ava: Deprecated AI assistant for Obsidian Notes based on ChatGPT. LLMFeeder: Browser extension for converting web pages to clean Markdown. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories. ### When should I choose obsidian-ava over LLMFeeder? Choose obsidian-ava over LLMFeeder when obsidian-ava is primarily TypeScript; LLMFeeder is JavaScript; Pricing: Available for free but may require premium Obsidian plugins or a ChatGPT subscription; Requirements: Requires TypeScript and ChatGPT integration. Not supported on environments lacking these.; Tags unique to obsidian-ava: computer-vision, deep-learning, knowledge-management, language-model; If you have legacy configurations relying on obsidian-ava's specific implementation for integrating AI into Obsidian notes, despite its deprecation status. ### When should I choose LLMFeeder over obsidian-ava? Choose LLMFeeder over obsidian-ava when LLMFeeder is primarily JavaScript; obsidian-ava is TypeScript; Tags unique to LLMFeeder: automation, browser-extension, llm, markdown; Also covers Model Training; When you need quick, clean markdown from webpages for use in AI language models. ### When should I avoid obsidian-ava? When seeking active development or support since the project is deprecated and not maintained anymore. If you require a more recent tool with updated features, use [File Organizer 2000](https://github.com/different-ai/file-organizer-2000) instead. ### When should I avoid LLMFeeder? For pages needing complex formatting retention since Markdown conversion strips style If real-time interaction with webpage content is required post-conversion, as it copies plain text only ### Is obsidian-ava or LLMFeeder more popular on GitHub? obsidian-ava has more GitHub stars (659 vs 451). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints. ### Are obsidian-ava and LLMFeeder open source? Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (obsidian-ava: MIT, LLMFeeder: MIT). ### Where can I find alternatives to obsidian-ava or LLMFeeder? GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [obsidian-ava alternatives](/tools/different-ai-obsidian-ava/alternatives) and [LLMFeeder alternatives](/tools/jatinkrmalik-llmfeeder/alternatives) ([obsidian-ava markdown twin](/tools/different-ai-obsidian-ava/alternatives.md), [LLMFeeder markdown twin](/tools/jatinkrmalik-llmfeeder/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes. ### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison? Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/different-ai-obsidian-ava-vs-jatinkrmalik-llmfeeder.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers. ### Which is better maintained, obsidian-ava or LLMFeeder? obsidian-ava: Dormant. LLMFeeder: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance. ### Where are the full trust reports for obsidian-ava and LLMFeeder? GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [obsidian-ava trust report](/tools/different-ai-obsidian-ava/trust); [LLMFeeder trust report](/tools/jatinkrmalik-llmfeeder/trust). --- **Machine-readable endpoints** - JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=different-ai-obsidian-ava`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=different-ai-obsidian-ava) - LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt) - Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt) _GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_