---
title: "magic vs cc-switch"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/dtyq-magic-vs-farion1231-cc-switch"
tools: ["dtyq-magic", "farion1231-cc-switch"]
---

# magic vs cc-switch

*GraphCanon updated Sep 20, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick magic if magic is an open-source suite combining AI agents with workflow management and collaboration tools like instant messaging; pick cc-switch if cc-switch is a cross-platform desktop tool for managing AI agents written in Rust and TypeScript.

[magic](https://www.magicrew.ai/) reports 5.0k GitHub stars, 561 forks, and 17 open issues, last pushed Aug 12, 2026. [cc-switch](https://ccswitch.io) has 134k stars, 9.2k forks, and 2.8k open issues, last pushed Sep 17, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [magic's repository](https://github.com/dtyq/magic) and [cc-switch's repository](https://github.com/farion1231/cc-switch).

| | [magic](/tools/dtyq-magic.md) | [cc-switch](/tools/farion1231-cc-switch.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | All-in-one AI productivity platform | A cross-platform desktop All-in-One assistant for multiple AI agents |
| Stars | 5,027 | 133,715 |
| Forks | 561 | 9,227 |
| Open issues | 17 | 2,786 |
| Language | TypeScript | Rust |
| Adopt for | Magic is an open-source suite combining AI agents with workflow management and collaboration tools like instant messaging. | cc-switch is a cross-platform desktop tool for managing AI agents written in Rust and TypeScript. |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | Magic Open Source License based on Apache 2.0 with additional restrictions, ensuring modifications are open but retaining copyrights and disclaimers as per the license. | cc-switch is distributed under the MIT License, allowing free modification and distribution as long as copyright notices are retained and changed licenses do not restrict usage.  |
| Categories | AI Agents, Developer Tools | AI Agents, Developer Tools |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [magic](/tools/dtyq-magic.md) | [cc-switch](/tools/farion1231-cc-switch.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maintenance | Steady (60%) | Very active (96%) |
| Days since push | 33d | 2d |
| Open issues (now) | 17 | 2.8k |
| Stars delta | +48 (30d) | +13k (30d) |
| Open issues delta | +3 (30d) | +687 (30d) |
| Owner type | Organization | User |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/dtyq-magic/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/farion1231-cc-switch/trust.md) |

## Decision facts: magic

- **Requirements:** Requires Docker
- **Adopt for:** Magic is an open-source suite combining AI agents with workflow management and collaboration tools like instant messaging.
- **License detail:** Magic Open Source License based on Apache 2.0 with additional restrictions, ensuring modifications are open but retaining copyrights and disclaimers as per the license.

## Decision facts: cc-switch

- **Adopt for:** cc-switch is a cross-platform desktop tool for managing AI agents written in Rust and TypeScript.
- **License detail:** cc-switch is distributed under the MIT License, allowing free modification and distribution as long as copyright notices are retained and changed licenses do not restrict usage. 

## Choose when

### Choose magic if…

- magic is primarily TypeScript; cc-switch is Rust.
- License: magic is Other, cc-switch is MIT.
- Requirements: Requires Docker.
- Tags unique to magic: agent, agi, ai, gpt.
- When a diverse set of functionalities under one platform is required for managing workflows, automating tasks, and enabling seamless communication among team members.

### Choose cc-switch if…

- cc-switch is primarily Rust; magic is TypeScript.
- License: cc-switch is MIT, magic is Other.
- Tags unique to cc-switch: claude-code, codex, desktop-app, hermes-agent.
- If you require seamless interaction with multiple AI agents such as Claude Code, Codex, or Gemini CLI in a single interface.

## When NOT to use magic

- When focused exclusively on a specialized aspect of AI development like model training, as Magic offers an all-in-one solution which might add unnecessary complexity.
- For users requiring immediate Windows OS compatibility without waiting for upcoming support releases, given that Windows is not currently supported in self-hosted setups.

## When NOT to use cc-switch

- If you are looking for a web-based or mobile app; cc-switch is strictly desktop-focused.
- Requires manual curation of supported agents, limiting its utility if your primary agent is not included by default.
- You prioritize the use of proprietary tools over open-source solutions.

## Common questions

### What is the difference between magic and cc-switch?

magic: All-in-one AI productivity platform. cc-switch: A cross-platform desktop All-in-One assistant for multiple AI agents. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose magic over cc-switch?

Choose magic over cc-switch when magic is primarily TypeScript; cc-switch is Rust; License: magic is Other, cc-switch is MIT; Requirements: Requires Docker; Tags unique to magic: agent, agi, ai, gpt; When a diverse set of functionalities under one platform is required for managing workflows, automating tasks, and enabling seamless communication among team members.

### When should I choose cc-switch over magic?

Choose cc-switch over magic when cc-switch is primarily Rust; magic is TypeScript; License: cc-switch is MIT, magic is Other; Tags unique to cc-switch: claude-code, codex, desktop-app, hermes-agent; If you require seamless interaction with multiple AI agents such as Claude Code, Codex, or Gemini CLI in a single interface.

### When should I avoid magic?

When focused exclusively on a specialized aspect of AI development like model training, as Magic offers an all-in-one solution which might add unnecessary complexity. For users requiring immediate Windows OS compatibility without waiting for upcoming support releases, given that Windows is not currently supported in self-hosted setups.

### When should I avoid cc-switch?

If you are looking for a web-based or mobile app; cc-switch is strictly desktop-focused. Requires manual curation of supported agents, limiting its utility if your primary agent is not included by default. You prioritize the use of proprietary tools over open-source solutions.

### Is magic or cc-switch more popular on GitHub?

cc-switch has more GitHub stars (133,715 vs 5,027). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are magic and cc-switch open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (magic: Other, cc-switch: MIT).

### Where can I find alternatives to magic or cc-switch?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [magic alternatives](/tools/dtyq-magic/alternatives) and [cc-switch alternatives](/tools/farion1231-cc-switch/alternatives) ([magic markdown twin](/tools/dtyq-magic/alternatives.md), [cc-switch markdown twin](/tools/farion1231-cc-switch/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/dtyq-magic-vs-farion1231-cc-switch.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, magic or cc-switch?

magic: Steady. cc-switch: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for magic and cc-switch?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [magic trust report](/tools/dtyq-magic/trust); [cc-switch trust report](/tools/farion1231-cc-switch/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=dtyq-magic`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=dtyq-magic)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
