--- title: "awesome-ai-sdks vs paseo" type: "comparison" canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/e2b-dev-awesome-ai-sdks-vs-getpaseo-paseo" tools: ["e2b-dev-awesome-ai-sdks", "getpaseo-paseo"] --- # awesome-ai-sdks vs paseo *GraphCanon updated Sep 20, 2026* ## Verdict Pick awesome-ai-sdks if awesome-ai-sdks offers an extensive directory of SDKs for AI agents, emphasizing its role in managing tools across different languages and ecosystems; pick paseo if paseo runs a local server daemon to manage coding agents through various clients including desktop apps, mobile apps, CLI, and self-hosted web UI. [awesome-ai-sdks](https://github.com/e2b-dev/awesome-ai-sdks) reports 1.2k GitHub stars, 399 forks, and 271 open issues, last pushed Jul 9, 2026. [paseo](https://paseo.sh) has 18k stars, 2.0k forks, and 853 open issues, last pushed Sep 17, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [awesome-ai-sdks's repository](https://github.com/e2b-dev/awesome-ai-sdks) and [paseo's repository](https://github.com/getpaseo/paseo). | | [awesome-ai-sdks](/tools/e2b-dev-awesome-ai-sdks.md) | [paseo](/tools/getpaseo-paseo.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Tagline | A database of SDKs for AI agents creation and management | Orchestrate multiple coding agents from desktop and mobile | | Stars | 1,223 | 17,619 | | Forks | 399 | 2,003 | | Open issues | 271 | 853 | | Language | - | TypeScript | | Adopt for | awesome-ai-sdks offers an extensive directory of SDKs for AI agents, emphasizing its role in managing tools across different languages and ecosystems. | Paseo runs a local server daemon to manage coding agents through various clients including desktop apps, mobile apps, CLI, and self-hosted web UI. | | Persona | - | - | | Runtime | - | - | | License | - | Other | | Categories | AI Agents, Developer Tools | AI Agents, Developer Tools | ## Trust and health _Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._ | | [awesome-ai-sdks](/tools/e2b-dev-awesome-ai-sdks.md) | [paseo](/tools/getpaseo-paseo.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Maintenance | Steady (60%) | Very active (96%) | | Days since push | 72d | 0d | | Open issues (now) | 271 | 853 | | Stars delta | +10 (30d) | +4.4k (30d) | | Open issues delta | +30 (30d) | +122 (30d) | | Full report | [trust report](/tools/e2b-dev-awesome-ai-sdks/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/getpaseo-paseo/trust.md) | ## Decision facts: awesome-ai-sdks - **Adopt for:** awesome-ai-sdks offers an extensive directory of SDKs for AI agents, emphasizing its role in managing tools across different languages and ecosystems. ## Decision facts: paseo - **Adopt for:** Paseo runs a local server daemon to manage coding agents through various clients including desktop apps, mobile apps, CLI, and self-hosted web UI. ## Choose when ### Choose awesome-ai-sdks if… - Tags unique to awesome-ai-sdks: agent, ai-agents, framework, langchain. - When you are looking to compile and access various SDKs and libraries for AI agent development from one centralized resource. - Leaner open-issue backlog (271). ### Choose paseo if… - Tags unique to paseo: ade, agents, android, claude-code. - When you need to orchestrate multiple code generation or modification tasks concurrently across different platforms - More GitHub stars (18k vs 1.2k) - visibility, not fit. ## When NOT to use awesome-ai-sdks - For projects requiring a real-time or regularly updated list since the repository acknowledges it's based on their best knowledge and might not be comprehensive. - If you specifically need production-ready tools. The repository contains links to alpha-stage projects like Chidori, which may not be suitable for immediate deployment. ## When NOT to use paseo - If your workflow does not involve managing coding agents from desktop, mobile apps, and CLI interfaces - When you prefer cloud-based orchestration without needing to set up a local daemon server ## Common questions ### What is the difference between awesome-ai-sdks and paseo? awesome-ai-sdks: A database of SDKs for AI agents creation and management. paseo: Orchestrate multiple coding agents from desktop and mobile. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories. ### When should I choose awesome-ai-sdks over paseo? Choose awesome-ai-sdks over paseo when Tags unique to awesome-ai-sdks: agent, ai-agents, framework, langchain; When you are looking to compile and access various SDKs and libraries for AI agent development from one centralized resource; Leaner open-issue backlog (271). ### When should I choose paseo over awesome-ai-sdks? Choose paseo over awesome-ai-sdks when Tags unique to paseo: ade, agents, android, claude-code; When you need to orchestrate multiple code generation or modification tasks concurrently across different platforms; More GitHub stars (18k vs 1.2k) - visibility, not fit. ### When should I avoid awesome-ai-sdks? For projects requiring a real-time or regularly updated list since the repository acknowledges it's based on their best knowledge and might not be comprehensive. If you specifically need production-ready tools. The repository contains links to alpha-stage projects like Chidori, which may not be suitable for immediate deployment. ### When should I avoid paseo? If your workflow does not involve managing coding agents from desktop, mobile apps, and CLI interfaces When you prefer cloud-based orchestration without needing to set up a local daemon server ### Is awesome-ai-sdks or paseo more popular on GitHub? paseo has more GitHub stars (17,619 vs 1,223). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints. ### Are awesome-ai-sdks and paseo open source? Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub. ### Where can I find alternatives to awesome-ai-sdks or paseo? GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [awesome-ai-sdks alternatives](/tools/e2b-dev-awesome-ai-sdks/alternatives) and [paseo alternatives](/tools/getpaseo-paseo/alternatives) ([awesome-ai-sdks markdown twin](/tools/e2b-dev-awesome-ai-sdks/alternatives.md), [paseo markdown twin](/tools/getpaseo-paseo/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes. ### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison? Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/e2b-dev-awesome-ai-sdks-vs-getpaseo-paseo.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers. ### Which is better maintained, awesome-ai-sdks or paseo? awesome-ai-sdks: Steady. paseo: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance. ### Where are the full trust reports for awesome-ai-sdks and paseo? GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [awesome-ai-sdks trust report](/tools/e2b-dev-awesome-ai-sdks/trust); [paseo trust report](/tools/getpaseo-paseo/trust). --- **Machine-readable endpoints** - JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=e2b-dev-awesome-ai-sdks`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=e2b-dev-awesome-ai-sdks) - LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt) - Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt) _GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_