--- title: "mteb vs futureagi-sdk" type: "comparison" canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/embeddings-benchmark-mteb-vs-future-agi-futureagi-sdk" tools: ["embeddings-benchmark-mteb", "future-agi-futureagi-sdk"] --- # mteb vs futureagi-sdk *GraphCanon updated Jul 12, 2026* ## Verdict Pick mteb when tags unique to mteb: benchmark, embeddings, information-retrieval, multilingual-nlp; pick futureagi-sdk when requirements: Supports Python and TypeScript languages; Automated evaluations with sub-100ms guardrails. [mteb](https://docs.mteb.org) reports 3.3k GitHub stars, 638 forks, and 295 open issues, last pushed Jul 9, 2026. [futureagi-sdk](https://app.futureagi.com) has 48 stars, 5 forks, and 3 open issues, last pushed Jul 8, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [mteb's repository](https://github.com/embeddings-benchmark/mteb) and [futureagi-sdk's repository](https://github.com/future-agi/futureagi-sdk). | | [mteb](/tools/embeddings-benchmark-mteb.md) | [futureagi-sdk](/tools/future-agi-futureagi-sdk.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Tagline | State-of-the-art evaluation of embeddings across languages and modalities | Production-grade AI evaluation, prompt management & observability SDK | | Stars | 3,349 | 48 | | Forks | 638 | 5 | | Open issues | 295 | 3 | | Language | Python | Python | | Adopt for | - | Future AGI SDK is an innovative toolkit designed for production-grade AI evaluation, prompt management, and observability. It supports Python and TypeScript languages and is licensed under Apache-2.0. | | Persona | - | - | | Runtime | - | - | | License | Apache-2.0 | The Future AGI SDK uses the Apache License, Version 2.0 (Apache-2.0). It allows users to freely use, modify, and distribute the software while maintaining copyright notices. | | Categories | Evaluation & Observability | Evaluation & Observability | ## Trust and health _Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._ | | [mteb](/tools/embeddings-benchmark-mteb.md) | [futureagi-sdk](/tools/future-agi-futureagi-sdk.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Days since push | 1d | 3d | | Open issues (now) | 295 | 3 | | Full report | [trust report](/tools/embeddings-benchmark-mteb/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/future-agi-futureagi-sdk/trust.md) | ## Decision facts: futureagi-sdk - **Requirements:** Supports Python and TypeScript languages; Automated evaluations with sub-100ms guardrails - **Adopt for:** Future AGI SDK is an innovative toolkit designed for production-grade AI evaluation, prompt management, and observability. It supports Python and TypeScript languages and is licensed under Apache-2.0. - **License detail:** The Future AGI SDK uses the Apache License, Version 2.0 (Apache-2.0). It allows users to freely use, modify, and distribute the software while maintaining copyright notices. ## Choose when ### Choose mteb if… - Tags unique to mteb: benchmark, embeddings, information-retrieval, multilingual-nlp. - mteb ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment. - More GitHub stars (3.3k vs 48) - visibility, not fit. ### Choose futureagi-sdk if… - Requirements: Supports Python and TypeScript languages; Automated evaluations with sub-100ms guardrails. - Tags unique to futureagi-sdk: ai-agents, annotations, dataset, development. - Future AGI SDK is an innovative toolkit designed for production-grade AI evaluation, prompt management, and observability. It supports Python and TypeScript languages and is licensed under Apache-2.0. ## When NOT to use mteb - Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers. ## When NOT to use futureagi-sdk - Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers. ## Common questions ### What is the difference between mteb and futureagi-sdk? mteb: State-of-the-art evaluation of embeddings across languages and modalities. futureagi-sdk: Production-grade AI evaluation, prompt management & observability SDK. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories. ### When should I choose mteb over futureagi-sdk? Choose mteb over futureagi-sdk when Tags unique to mteb: benchmark, embeddings, information-retrieval, multilingual-nlp; mteb ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; More GitHub stars (3.3k vs 48) - visibility, not fit. ### When should I choose futureagi-sdk over mteb? Choose futureagi-sdk over mteb when Requirements: Supports Python and TypeScript languages; Automated evaluations with sub-100ms guardrails; Tags unique to futureagi-sdk: ai-agents, annotations, dataset, development; Future AGI SDK is an innovative toolkit designed for production-grade AI evaluation, prompt management, and observability. It supports Python and TypeScript languages and is licensed under Apache-2.0. ### When should I avoid mteb? Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers. ### When should I avoid futureagi-sdk? Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers. ### Is mteb or futureagi-sdk more popular on GitHub? mteb has more GitHub stars (3,349 vs 48). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints. ### Are mteb and futureagi-sdk open source? Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (mteb: Apache-2.0, futureagi-sdk: Apache-2.0). ### Where can I find alternatives to mteb or futureagi-sdk? GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [mteb alternatives](/tools/embeddings-benchmark-mteb/alternatives) and [futureagi-sdk alternatives](/tools/future-agi-futureagi-sdk/alternatives) ([mteb markdown twin](/tools/embeddings-benchmark-mteb/alternatives.md), [futureagi-sdk markdown twin](/tools/future-agi-futureagi-sdk/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes. ### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison? Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/embeddings-benchmark-mteb-vs-future-agi-futureagi-sdk.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers. ### Which is better maintained, mteb or futureagi-sdk? mteb: Very active. futureagi-sdk: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance. ### Where are the full trust reports for mteb and futureagi-sdk? GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [mteb trust report](/tools/embeddings-benchmark-mteb/trust); [futureagi-sdk trust report](/tools/future-agi-futureagi-sdk/trust). --- **Machine-readable endpoints** - JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=embeddings-benchmark-mteb`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=embeddings-benchmark-mteb) - LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt) - Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt) _GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_