---
title: "mteb vs lighteval"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/embeddings-benchmark-mteb-vs-huggingface-lighteval"
tools: ["embeddings-benchmark-mteb", "huggingface-lighteval"]
---

# mteb vs lighteval

*GraphCanon updated Jul 12, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick mteb when license: mteb is Apache-2.0, lighteval is MIT; pick lighteval when license: lighteval is MIT, mteb is Apache-2.0.

[mteb](https://docs.mteb.org) reports 3.3k GitHub stars, 638 forks, and 295 open issues, last pushed Jul 9, 2026. [lighteval](https://huggingface.co/docs/lighteval/en/index) has 2.5k stars, 506 forks, and 347 open issues, last pushed Jun 29, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [mteb's repository](https://github.com/embeddings-benchmark/mteb) and [lighteval's repository](https://github.com/huggingface/lighteval).

| | [mteb](/tools/embeddings-benchmark-mteb.md) | [lighteval](/tools/huggingface-lighteval.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | State-of-the-art evaluation of embeddings across languages and modalities | All-in-one toolkit for evaluating LLMs across multiple backends |
| Stars | 3,349 | 2,472 |
| Forks | 638 | 506 |
| Open issues | 295 | 347 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Adopt for | - | Lighteval is designed for evaluating language models across multiple backends. It integrates well with Hugging Face and provides a wide range of extras, making it particularly handy in non-Windows environments. |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Categories | Evaluation & Observability | Evaluation & Observability |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [mteb](/tools/embeddings-benchmark-mteb.md) | [lighteval](/tools/huggingface-lighteval.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maintenance | Very active (96%) | Active (82%) |
| Days since push | 1d | 11d |
| Open issues (now) | 295 | 347 |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/embeddings-benchmark-mteb/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/huggingface-lighteval/trust.md) |

## Decision facts: lighteval

- **Adopt for:** Lighteval is designed for evaluating language models across multiple backends. It integrates well with Hugging Face and provides a wide range of extras, making it particularly handy in non-Windows environments.

## Choose when

### Choose mteb if…

- License: mteb is Apache-2.0, lighteval is MIT.
- Tags unique to mteb: benchmark, embeddings, information-retrieval, multilingual-nlp.
- mteb ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.

### Choose lighteval if…

- License: lighteval is MIT, mteb is Apache-2.0.
- Tags unique to lighteval: evaluation framework, evaluation-metrics, huggingface, python.
- When you need to evaluate the performance of various LLMs on different backend infrastructures, especially if you are working within Mac/Linux environments.

## When NOT to use mteb

- Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers.

## When NOT to use lighteval

- Avoid Lighteval for evaluations on Windows systems as it is currently untested and not supported there.
- Should you require a solution that does not integrate with or depend on the Hugging Face ecosystem, Lighteval might not fulfill your needs.

## Common questions

### What is the difference between mteb and lighteval?

mteb: State-of-the-art evaluation of embeddings across languages and modalities. lighteval: All-in-one toolkit for evaluating LLMs across multiple backends. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose mteb over lighteval?

Choose mteb over lighteval when License: mteb is Apache-2.0, lighteval is MIT; Tags unique to mteb: benchmark, embeddings, information-retrieval, multilingual-nlp; mteb ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.

### When should I choose lighteval over mteb?

Choose lighteval over mteb when License: lighteval is MIT, mteb is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to lighteval: evaluation framework, evaluation-metrics, huggingface, python; When you need to evaluate the performance of various LLMs on different backend infrastructures, especially if you are working within Mac/Linux environments.

### When should I avoid mteb?

Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers.

### When should I avoid lighteval?

Avoid Lighteval for evaluations on Windows systems as it is currently untested and not supported there. Should you require a solution that does not integrate with or depend on the Hugging Face ecosystem, Lighteval might not fulfill your needs.

### Is mteb or lighteval more popular on GitHub?

mteb has more GitHub stars (3,349 vs 2,472). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are mteb and lighteval open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (mteb: Apache-2.0, lighteval: MIT).

### Where can I find alternatives to mteb or lighteval?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [mteb alternatives](/tools/embeddings-benchmark-mteb/alternatives) and [lighteval alternatives](/tools/huggingface-lighteval/alternatives) ([mteb markdown twin](/tools/embeddings-benchmark-mteb/alternatives.md), [lighteval markdown twin](/tools/huggingface-lighteval/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/embeddings-benchmark-mteb-vs-huggingface-lighteval.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, mteb or lighteval?

mteb: Very active. lighteval: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for mteb and lighteval?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [mteb trust report](/tools/embeddings-benchmark-mteb/trust); [lighteval trust report](/tools/huggingface-lighteval/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=embeddings-benchmark-mteb`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=embeddings-benchmark-mteb)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
