---
title: "agentdojo vs awesome-ai-agents-security"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/ethz-spylab-agentdojo-vs-projectrecon-awesome-ai-agents-security"
tools: ["ethz-spylab-agentdojo", "projectrecon-awesome-ai-agents-security"]
---

# agentdojo vs awesome-ai-agents-security

*GraphCanon updated Aug 9, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick agentdojo if agentDojo serves as a benchmarking environment to evaluate security attacks, like prompt injection, and defenses for Large Language Model (LLM) agents; pick awesome-ai-agents-security if awesome-ai-agents-security is a curated list of open-source tools for securing autonomous AI agents, covering the security lifecycle from red teaming to runtime protection.

[agentdojo](https://agentdojo.spylab.ai/) reports 716 GitHub stars, 188 forks, and 41 open issues, last pushed Jun 2, 2026. [awesome-ai-agents-security](https://github.com/ProjectRecon/awesome-ai-agents-security) has 59 stars, 74 forks, and 61 open issues, last pushed Jun 12, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [agentdojo's repository](https://github.com/ethz-spylab/agentdojo) and [awesome-ai-agents-security's repository](https://github.com/ProjectRecon/awesome-ai-agents-security).

| | [agentdojo](/tools/ethz-spylab-agentdojo.md) | [awesome-ai-agents-security](/tools/projectrecon-awesome-ai-agents-security.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM Agents | A curated list of open-source tools and resources for securing autonomous AI agents. |
| Stars | 716 | 59 |
| Forks | 188 | 74 |
| Open issues | 41 | 61 |
| Language | Python | - |
| Adopt for | AgentDojo serves as a benchmarking environment to evaluate security attacks, like prompt injection, and defenses for Large Language Model (LLM) agents. | awesome-ai-agents-security is a curated list of open-source tools for securing autonomous AI agents, covering the security lifecycle from red teaming to runtime protection. |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Categories | AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability | AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [agentdojo](/tools/ethz-spylab-agentdojo.md) | [awesome-ai-agents-security](/tools/projectrecon-awesome-ai-agents-security.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Days since push | 63d | 58d |
| Open issues (now) | 41 | 61 |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/ethz-spylab-agentdojo/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/projectrecon-awesome-ai-agents-security/trust.md) |

## Decision facts: agentdojo

- **Pricing:** freemium - Open-source under the MIT License. Some advanced features might require additional libraries or APIs.
- **Requirements:** Min 8 GB RAM
- **Adopt for:** AgentDojo serves as a benchmarking environment to evaluate security attacks, like prompt injection, and defenses for Large Language Model (LLM) agents.

## Decision facts: awesome-ai-agents-security

- **Adopt for:** awesome-ai-agents-security is a curated list of open-source tools for securing autonomous AI agents, covering the security lifecycle from red teaming to runtime protection.

## Choose when

### Choose agentdojo if…

- License: agentdojo is MIT, awesome-ai-agents-security is Other.
- Pricing: Open-source under the MIT License. Some advanced features might require additional libraries or APIs..
- Requirements: Min 8 GB RAM.
- Tags unique to agentdojo: benchmark, large language models, prompt-injection, security.
- AgentDojo serves as a benchmarking environment to evaluate security attacks, like prompt injection, and defenses for Large Language Model (LLM) agents.

### Choose awesome-ai-agents-security if…

- License: awesome-ai-agents-security is Other, agentdojo is MIT.
- Tags unique to awesome-ai-agents-security: ai-agents, ai-security, autonomous-agents, awesome-list.
- When needing a comprehensive overview of open-source tools for securing autonomous AI agents across different phases such as red teaming and runtime protection

## When NOT to use agentdojo

- AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
- Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers.

## When NOT to use awesome-ai-agents-security

- When you require real-time threat intelligence feeds, which are not provided by this repository's static resource lists
- For organizations focusing on proprietary tools and resources that prefer not to use open-source solutions for their AI agents' security lifecycle management

## Common questions

### What is the difference between agentdojo and awesome-ai-agents-security?

agentdojo: A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM Agents. awesome-ai-agents-security: A curated list of open-source tools and resources for securing autonomous AI agents.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose agentdojo over awesome-ai-agents-security?

Choose agentdojo over awesome-ai-agents-security when License: agentdojo is MIT, awesome-ai-agents-security is Other; Pricing: Open-source under the MIT License. Some advanced features might require additional libraries or APIs.; Requirements: Min 8 GB RAM; Tags unique to agentdojo: benchmark, large language models, prompt-injection, security; AgentDojo serves as a benchmarking environment to evaluate security attacks, like prompt injection, and defenses for Large Language Model (LLM) agents.

### When should I choose awesome-ai-agents-security over agentdojo?

Choose awesome-ai-agents-security over agentdojo when License: awesome-ai-agents-security is Other, agentdojo is MIT; Tags unique to awesome-ai-agents-security: ai-agents, ai-security, autonomous-agents, awesome-list; When needing a comprehensive overview of open-source tools for securing autonomous AI agents across different phases such as red teaming and runtime protection.

### When should I avoid agentdojo?

AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers.

### When should I avoid awesome-ai-agents-security?

When you require real-time threat intelligence feeds, which are not provided by this repository's static resource lists For organizations focusing on proprietary tools and resources that prefer not to use open-source solutions for their AI agents' security lifecycle management

### Is agentdojo or awesome-ai-agents-security more popular on GitHub?

agentdojo has more GitHub stars (716 vs 59). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are agentdojo and awesome-ai-agents-security open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (agentdojo: MIT, awesome-ai-agents-security: Other).

### Where can I find alternatives to agentdojo or awesome-ai-agents-security?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [agentdojo alternatives](/tools/ethz-spylab-agentdojo/alternatives) and [awesome-ai-agents-security alternatives](/tools/projectrecon-awesome-ai-agents-security/alternatives) ([agentdojo markdown twin](/tools/ethz-spylab-agentdojo/alternatives.md), [awesome-ai-agents-security markdown twin](/tools/projectrecon-awesome-ai-agents-security/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/ethz-spylab-agentdojo-vs-projectrecon-awesome-ai-agents-security.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, agentdojo or awesome-ai-agents-security?

agentdojo: Steady. awesome-ai-agents-security: Steady. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for agentdojo and awesome-ai-agents-security?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [agentdojo trust report](/tools/ethz-spylab-agentdojo/trust); [awesome-ai-agents-security trust report](/tools/projectrecon-awesome-ai-agents-security/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=ethz-spylab-agentdojo`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=ethz-spylab-agentdojo)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
