---
title: "evalplus vs auto-evaluator"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/evalplus-evalplus-vs-langchain-ai-auto-evaluator"
tools: ["evalplus-evalplus", "langchain-ai-auto-evaluator"]
---

# evalplus vs auto-evaluator

*GraphCanon updated Aug 8, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick evalplus when evalplus is primarily Python; auto-evaluator is TypeScript; pick auto-evaluator when auto-evaluator is primarily TypeScript; evalplus is Python.

[evalplus](https://evalplus.github.io) reports 1.8k GitHub stars, 205 forks, and 71 open issues, last pushed Oct 2, 2025. [auto-evaluator](https://autoevaluator.langchain.com/) has 783 stars, 102 forks, and 21 open issues, last pushed Jun 26, 2025. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [evalplus's repository](https://github.com/evalplus/evalplus) and [auto-evaluator's repository](https://github.com/langchain-ai/auto-evaluator).

| | [evalplus](/tools/evalplus-evalplus.md) | [auto-evaluator](/tools/langchain-ai-auto-evaluator.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | Rigorous evaluation of LLM-synthesized code | auto-evaluator |
| Stars | 1,794 | 783 |
| Forks | 205 | 102 |
| Open issues | 71 | 21 |
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| Adopt for | evalplus offers tools for rigorously benchmarking and evaluating large language models like GPT-4 and ChatGPT in synthesizing program code using Python under the Apache-2.0 license. | - |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Categories | Evaluation & Observability | Evaluation & Observability |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [evalplus](/tools/evalplus-evalplus.md) | [auto-evaluator](/tools/langchain-ai-auto-evaluator.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maintenance | Slowing (36%) | Archived (8%) |
| Days since push | 306d | 408d |
| Archived on GitHub | No | Yes |
| Open issues (now) | 71 | 21 |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/evalplus-evalplus/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/langchain-ai-auto-evaluator/trust.md) |

## Decision facts: evalplus

- **Adopt for:** evalplus offers tools for rigorously benchmarking and evaluating large language models like GPT-4 and ChatGPT in synthesizing program code using Python under the Apache-2.0 license.

## Choose when

### Choose evalplus if…

- evalplus is primarily Python; auto-evaluator is TypeScript.
- License: evalplus is Apache-2.0, auto-evaluator is Other.
- Tags unique to evalplus: benchmark, chatgpt, efficiency, program-synthesis.
- evalplus ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- When you need advanced benchmarks specific to large language model generated program synthesis, such as from GPT-4 or ChatGPT.

### Choose auto-evaluator if…

- auto-evaluator is primarily TypeScript; evalplus is Python.
- License: auto-evaluator is Other, evalplus is Apache-2.0.
- Tags unique to auto-evaluator: auto-evaluation, railway, typescript, vercel.
- Use auto-evaluator when you are working with TypeScript and need an integrated solution for evaluating AI models

## When NOT to use evalplus

- Avoid if you require broad language model benchmarking that is not specifically focused on program synthesis capabilities.
- Do not use evalplus if your project does not benefit from or need Docker-based isolation for code execution safety measures, such as in controlled lab environments without external dependencies.

## When NOT to use auto-evaluator

- Avoid using auto-evaluator if you require a multi-language support environment, as it focuses solely on TypeScript
- Do not use this tool if your project's hosting requirements do not align with using Vercel or Railway

## Common questions

### What is the difference between evalplus and auto-evaluator?

evalplus: Rigorous evaluation of LLM-synthesized code. auto-evaluator: auto-evaluator. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose evalplus over auto-evaluator?

Choose evalplus over auto-evaluator when evalplus is primarily Python; auto-evaluator is TypeScript; License: evalplus is Apache-2.0, auto-evaluator is Other; Tags unique to evalplus: benchmark, chatgpt, efficiency, program-synthesis; evalplus ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; When you need advanced benchmarks specific to large language model generated program synthesis, such as from GPT-4 or ChatGPT.

### When should I choose auto-evaluator over evalplus?

Choose auto-evaluator over evalplus when auto-evaluator is primarily TypeScript; evalplus is Python; License: auto-evaluator is Other, evalplus is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to auto-evaluator: auto-evaluation, railway, typescript, vercel; Use auto-evaluator when you are working with TypeScript and need an integrated solution for evaluating AI models.

### When should I avoid evalplus?

Avoid if you require broad language model benchmarking that is not specifically focused on program synthesis capabilities. Do not use evalplus if your project does not benefit from or need Docker-based isolation for code execution safety measures, such as in controlled lab environments without external dependencies.

### When should I avoid auto-evaluator?

Avoid using auto-evaluator if you require a multi-language support environment, as it focuses solely on TypeScript Do not use this tool if your project's hosting requirements do not align with using Vercel or Railway

### Is evalplus or auto-evaluator more popular on GitHub?

evalplus has more GitHub stars (1,794 vs 783). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are evalplus and auto-evaluator open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (evalplus: Apache-2.0, auto-evaluator: Other).

### Where can I find alternatives to evalplus or auto-evaluator?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [evalplus alternatives](/tools/evalplus-evalplus/alternatives) and [auto-evaluator alternatives](/tools/langchain-ai-auto-evaluator/alternatives) ([evalplus markdown twin](/tools/evalplus-evalplus/alternatives.md), [auto-evaluator markdown twin](/tools/langchain-ai-auto-evaluator/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/evalplus-evalplus-vs-langchain-ai-auto-evaluator.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, evalplus or auto-evaluator?

evalplus: Slowing. auto-evaluator: Archived. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for evalplus and auto-evaluator?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [evalplus trust report](/tools/evalplus-evalplus/trust); [auto-evaluator trust report](/tools/langchain-ai-auto-evaluator/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=evalplus-evalplus`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=evalplus-evalplus)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
