---
title: "ai-gateway vs gpustack"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/ferro-labs-ai-gateway-vs-gpustack-gpustack"
tools: ["ferro-labs-ai-gateway", "gpustack-gpustack"]
---

# ai-gateway vs gpustack

*GraphCanon updated Aug 9, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick ai-gateway if ai-gateway from Ferro Labs supports over 30 LLMs with integrated caching, guardrails, A/B testing, and cost controls, making it ideal for managing multiple language models in a production environment; pick gpustack if gpustack is a Python-based tool for managing GPU clusters focused on efficient AI model inference and on-demand SSH-accessible GPU instances.

[ai-gateway](https://docs.ferrolabs.ai) reports 219 GitHub stars, 33 forks, and 63 open issues, last pushed Aug 7, 2026. [gpustack](https://gpustack.ai) has 5.5k stars, 609 forks, and 673 open issues, last pushed Aug 7, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [ai-gateway's repository](https://github.com/ferro-labs/ai-gateway) and [gpustack's repository](https://github.com/gpustack/gpustack).

| | [ai-gateway](/tools/ferro-labs-ai-gateway.md) | [gpustack](/tools/gpustack-gpustack.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | Unified AI Gateway for multiple LLMs with caching, guardrails, A/B testing, and cost controls | A GPU cluster manager for high-performance AI model serving and on-demand SSH-accessible GPU instances |
| Stars | 219 | 5,454 |
| Forks | 33 | 609 |
| Open issues | 63 | 673 |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Adopt for | ai-gateway from Ferro Labs supports over 30 LLMs with integrated caching, guardrails, A/B testing, and cost controls, making it ideal for managing multiple language models in a production environment. | gpustack is a Python-based tool for managing GPU clusters focused on efficient AI model inference and on-demand SSH-accessible GPU instances. |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | Apache-2.0 - a permissive free software license | Apache-2.0 |
| Categories | Inference & Serving, Model Training | Inference & Serving |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [ai-gateway](/tools/ferro-labs-ai-gateway.md) | [gpustack](/tools/gpustack-gpustack.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Days since push | 2d | 0d |
| Open issues (now) | 63 | 673 |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/ferro-labs-ai-gateway/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/gpustack-gpustack/trust.md) |

## Decision facts: ai-gateway

- **Adopt for:** ai-gateway from Ferro Labs supports over 30 LLMs with integrated caching, guardrails, A/B testing, and cost controls, making it ideal for managing multiple language models in a production environment.
- **License detail:** Apache-2.0 - a permissive free software license

## Decision facts: gpustack

- **Pricing:** freemium
- **Requirements:** Requires Docker
- **Adopt for:** gpustack is a Python-based tool for managing GPU clusters focused on efficient AI model inference and on-demand SSH-accessible GPU instances.
- **License detail:** Apache-2.0

## Choose when

### Choose ai-gateway if…

- ai-gateway is primarily Go; gpustack is Python.
- Tags unique to ai-gateway: ai-gateway, litellm, llm-cost, llm-proxy.
- Also covers Model Training.
- When you need to integrate more than 30 different LLM services including OpenAI and Anthropic

### Choose gpustack if…

- gpustack is primarily Python; ai-gateway is Go.
- Requirements: Requires Docker.
- Tags unique to gpustack: ascend, cuda, deepseek, distributed-inference.
- When you need to manage multiple GPUs for high-performance inference tasks with models like vLLM or SGLang.

## When NOT to use ai-gateway

- If your project only involves one or two LLMs which does not necessitate the gateway's broad compatibility features
- For small-scale projects that do not require comprehensive cost analysis tools
- When custom integration for specific guardrails is required, as ai-gateway offers generalized settings

## When NOT to use gpustack

- If your deployment constraints do not permit the use of Docker containers and there is a need for bare-metal deployments without containerized solutions.
- When the tool-specific focus on certain models like vLLM or SGLang does not align with the model ecosystem preferred by your team.

## Common questions

### What is the difference between ai-gateway and gpustack?

ai-gateway: Unified AI Gateway for multiple LLMs with caching, guardrails, A/B testing, and cost controls. gpustack: A GPU cluster manager for high-performance AI model serving and on-demand SSH-accessible GPU instances. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose ai-gateway over gpustack?

Choose ai-gateway over gpustack when ai-gateway is primarily Go; gpustack is Python; Tags unique to ai-gateway: ai-gateway, litellm, llm-cost, llm-proxy; Also covers Model Training; When you need to integrate more than 30 different LLM services including OpenAI and Anthropic.

### When should I choose gpustack over ai-gateway?

Choose gpustack over ai-gateway when gpustack is primarily Python; ai-gateway is Go; Requirements: Requires Docker; Tags unique to gpustack: ascend, cuda, deepseek, distributed-inference; When you need to manage multiple GPUs for high-performance inference tasks with models like vLLM or SGLang.

### When should I avoid ai-gateway?

If your project only involves one or two LLMs which does not necessitate the gateway's broad compatibility features For small-scale projects that do not require comprehensive cost analysis tools When custom integration for specific guardrails is required, as ai-gateway offers generalized settings

### When should I avoid gpustack?

If your deployment constraints do not permit the use of Docker containers and there is a need for bare-metal deployments without containerized solutions. When the tool-specific focus on certain models like vLLM or SGLang does not align with the model ecosystem preferred by your team.

### Is ai-gateway or gpustack more popular on GitHub?

gpustack has more GitHub stars (5,454 vs 219). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are ai-gateway and gpustack open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (ai-gateway: Apache-2.0, gpustack: Apache-2.0).

### Where can I find alternatives to ai-gateway or gpustack?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [ai-gateway alternatives](/tools/ferro-labs-ai-gateway/alternatives) and [gpustack alternatives](/tools/gpustack-gpustack/alternatives) ([ai-gateway markdown twin](/tools/ferro-labs-ai-gateway/alternatives.md), [gpustack markdown twin](/tools/gpustack-gpustack/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/ferro-labs-ai-gateway-vs-gpustack-gpustack.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, ai-gateway or gpustack?

ai-gateway: Very active. gpustack: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for ai-gateway and gpustack?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [ai-gateway trust report](/tools/ferro-labs-ai-gateway/trust); [gpustack trust report](/tools/gpustack-gpustack/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=ferro-labs-ai-gateway`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=ferro-labs-ai-gateway)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
