---
title: "graphiti vs PageIndex"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/getzep-graphiti-vs-vectifyai-pageindex"
tools: ["getzep-graphiti", "vectifyai-pageindex"]
---

# graphiti vs PageIndex

Neutral, constraint-first comparison with live GitHub stats.

| | [graphiti](/tools/getzep-graphiti.md) | [PageIndex](/tools/vectifyai-pageindex.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | Build Real-Time Knowledge Graphs for AI Agents | Document Index for Vectorless, Reasoning-based RAG |
| Stars | 28,498 | 33,874 |
| Forks | 2,869 | 2,962 |
| Open issues | 415 | 134 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Adopt for | Graphiti is a framework for building temporal context graphs, essential for AI agents that operate in environments with rapidly evolving or frequently changing data. | PageIndex is a reasoning-based RAG system suitable for applications requiring context-aware retrieval and avoiding vector databases or chunking, specifically designed to handle professional long-form documents. |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Categories | Data & Retrieval, AI Agents | Data & Retrieval |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [graphiti](/tools/getzep-graphiti.md) | [PageIndex](/tools/vectifyai-pageindex.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Open issues (now) | 415 | 134 |
| Security scan | No lockfile | 2 low (2 low) |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/getzep-graphiti/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/vectifyai-pageindex/trust.md) |

**Typed relationship:** graphiti _(alternative)_ PageIndex

PageIndex focuses on context-aware retrieval and reasoning for RAG, whereas Graphiti is aimed at building real-time knowledge graphs which can be utilized by AI agents for improved understanding of the relational data.

## Decision facts: graphiti

- **Requirements:** Min 4 GB RAM; - Python runtime is required as Graphiti is built in Python.; - Apache-2.0 licensed, meaning it's free to use but any contributions should respect the open-source nature.; - Familiarity with graph databases and temporal data management concepts can help leverage the full potential of Graphiti in AI agent development.
- **Adopt for:** Graphiti is a framework for building temporal context graphs, essential for AI agents that operate in environments with rapidly evolving or frequently changing data.

## Decision facts: PageIndex

- **Requirements:** PageIndex operates independently of vector databases, and it does not require Docker. However, specific resource requirements depend on the scale of documents.
- **Adopt for:** PageIndex is a reasoning-based RAG system suitable for applications requiring context-aware retrieval and avoiding vector databases or chunking, specifically designed to handle professional long-form documents.

## Choose when

### Choose graphiti if…

- License: graphiti is Apache-2.0, PageIndex is MIT.
- Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; - Python runtime is required as Graphiti is built in Python.; - Apache-2.0 licensed, meaning it's free to use but any contributions should respect the open-source nature.; - Familiarity with graph databases and temporal data management concepts can help leverage the full potential of Graphiti in AI agent development..
- PageIndex focuses on context-aware retrieval and reasoning for RAG, whereas Graphiti is aimed at building real-time knowledge graphs which can be utilized by AI agents for improved understanding of the relational data.
- Tags unique to graphiti: llms, graph.
- Also covers AI Agents.
- graphiti ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- - When developing interactive applications where the context graph needs to evolve dynamically based on user interactions and external information.

### Choose PageIndex if…

- License: PageIndex is MIT, graphiti is Apache-2.0.
- Requirements: PageIndex operates independently of vector databases, and it does not require Docker. However, specific resource requirements depend on the scale of documents..
- PageIndex focuses on context-aware retrieval and reasoning for RAG, whereas Graphiti is aimed at building real-time knowledge graphs which can be utilized by AI agents for improved understanding of the relational data.
- Tags unique to PageIndex: llm, reasoning, agentic-ai, information-retrieval.
- - When handling long professional documents that require deep contextual understanding and multi-step reasoning where traditional similarity searches fall short.

## When NOT to use graphiti

- - If your application requires only a static snapshot of the knowledge graph at a given point in time.
- - For use cases where data does not change rapidly or significantly over time, making the tracking of temporal validity windows unnecessary.
- - When you prefer traditional retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods without support for incremental updates and efficient historical queries.

## When NOT to use PageIndex

- - If your application relies on quick, chunk-based indexing as PageIndex constructs a hierarchical tree index which could be slower for small documents or real-time applications.
- - In scenarios where you already have an established and optimized vector database infrastructure that performs well for your retrieval needs.

## Common questions

### What is the difference between graphiti and PageIndex?

graphiti: Build Real-Time Knowledge Graphs for AI Agents. PageIndex: Document Index for Vectorless, Reasoning-based RAG. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose graphiti over PageIndex?

Choose graphiti over PageIndex when License: graphiti is Apache-2.0, PageIndex is MIT; Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; - Python runtime is required as Graphiti is built in Python.; - Apache-2.0 licensed, meaning it's free to use but any contributions should respect the open-source nature.; - Familiarity with graph databases and temporal data management concepts can help leverage the full potential of Graphiti in AI agent development.; PageIndex focuses on context-aware retrieval and reasoning for RAG, whereas Graphiti is aimed at building real-time knowledge graphs which can be utilized by AI agents for improved understanding of the relational data; Tags unique to graphiti: llms, graph; Also covers AI Agents; graphiti ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; - When developing interactive applications where the context graph needs to evolve dynamically based on user interactions and external information.

### When should I choose PageIndex over graphiti?

Choose PageIndex over graphiti when License: PageIndex is MIT, graphiti is Apache-2.0; Requirements: PageIndex operates independently of vector databases, and it does not require Docker. However, specific resource requirements depend on the scale of documents.; PageIndex focuses on context-aware retrieval and reasoning for RAG, whereas Graphiti is aimed at building real-time knowledge graphs which can be utilized by AI agents for improved understanding of the relational data; Tags unique to PageIndex: llm, reasoning, agentic-ai, information-retrieval; - When handling long professional documents that require deep contextual understanding and multi-step reasoning where traditional similarity searches fall short.

### When should I avoid graphiti?

- If your application requires only a static snapshot of the knowledge graph at a given point in time. - For use cases where data does not change rapidly or significantly over time, making the tracking of temporal validity windows unnecessary. - When you prefer traditional retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods without support for incremental updates and efficient historical queries.

### When should I avoid PageIndex?

- If your application relies on quick, chunk-based indexing as PageIndex constructs a hierarchical tree index which could be slower for small documents or real-time applications. - In scenarios where you already have an established and optimized vector database infrastructure that performs well for your retrieval needs.

### Is graphiti or PageIndex more popular on GitHub?

PageIndex has more GitHub stars (33,874 vs 28,498). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are graphiti and PageIndex open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (graphiti: Apache-2.0, PageIndex: MIT).

### Where can I find alternatives to graphiti or PageIndex?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at /tools/getzep-graphiti/alternatives and /tools/vectifyai-pageindex/alternatives (/tools/getzep-graphiti/alternatives.md, /tools/vectifyai-pageindex/alternatives.md), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at /compare/getzep-graphiti-vs-vectifyai-pageindex.md mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, graphiti or PageIndex?

graphiti: Very active. PageIndex: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for graphiti and PageIndex?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: graphiti: /tools/getzep-graphiti/trust; PageIndex: /tools/vectifyai-pageindex/trust.

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=getzep-graphiti`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=getzep-graphiti)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
