---
title: "Spearmint vs stanford_alpaca"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/hips-spearmint-vs-tatsu-lab-stanford-alpaca"
tools: ["hips-spearmint", "tatsu-lab-stanford-alpaca"]
---

# Spearmint vs stanford_alpaca

*GraphCanon updated Jul 12, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick Spearmint when license: Spearmint is Other, stanford_alpaca is Apache-2.0; pick stanford_alpaca when license: stanford_alpaca is Apache-2.0, Spearmint is Other.

[Spearmint](https://github.com/HIPS/Spearmint) reports 1.6k GitHub stars, 328 forks, and 77 open issues, last pushed Dec 27, 2019. [stanford_alpaca](https://crfm.stanford.edu/2023/03/13/alpaca.html) has 30k stars, 4.0k forks, and 188 open issues, last pushed Jul 17, 2024. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [Spearmint's repository](https://github.com/HIPS/Spearmint) and [stanford_alpaca's repository](https://github.com/tatsu-lab/stanford_alpaca).

| | [Spearmint](/tools/hips-spearmint.md) | [stanford_alpaca](/tools/tatsu-lab-stanford-alpaca.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | Spearmint Bayesian optimization codebase | Code and documentation to train Stanford's Alpaca models, and generate the data. |
| Stars | 1,570 | 30,250 |
| Forks | 328 | 3,985 |
| Open issues | 77 | 188 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Adopt for | - | - |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Categories | Vector Databases, Model Training | Vector Databases, LLM Frameworks, Model Training |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [Spearmint](/tools/hips-spearmint.md) | [stanford_alpaca](/tools/tatsu-lab-stanford-alpaca.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Days since push | 2388d | 724d |
| Open issues (now) | 77 | 188 |
| Security scan | No lockfile | 46 low (46 low) |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/hips-spearmint/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/tatsu-lab-stanford-alpaca/trust.md) |

## Choose when

### Choose Spearmint if…

- License: Spearmint is Other, stanford_alpaca is Apache-2.0.
- Leaner open-issue backlog (77).

### Choose stanford_alpaca if…

- License: stanford_alpaca is Apache-2.0, Spearmint is Other.
- Tags unique to stanford_alpaca: deep-learning, language-model, instruction-following.
- Also covers LLM Frameworks.

## When NOT to use Spearmint

- Last GitHub push was 2388 days ago (dormant maintenance, Dec 27, 2019). Validate activity before betting a new project on Spearmint.
- Vector Databases: Don't reach for a dedicated vector DB under ~100k vectors; pgvector on your existing Postgres is simpler to operate.
- Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge.

## When NOT to use stanford_alpaca

- Last GitHub push was 724 days ago (dormant maintenance, Jul 17, 2024). Validate activity before betting a new project on stanford_alpaca.
- Vector Databases: Don't reach for a dedicated vector DB under ~100k vectors; pgvector on your existing Postgres is simpler to operate.
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
- Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge.

## Common questions

### What is the difference between Spearmint and stanford_alpaca?

Spearmint: Spearmint Bayesian optimization codebase. stanford_alpaca: Code and documentation to train Stanford's Alpaca models, and generate the data.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose Spearmint over stanford_alpaca?

Choose Spearmint over stanford_alpaca when License: Spearmint is Other, stanford_alpaca is Apache-2.0; Leaner open-issue backlog (77).

### When should I choose stanford_alpaca over Spearmint?

Choose stanford_alpaca over Spearmint when License: stanford_alpaca is Apache-2.0, Spearmint is Other; Tags unique to stanford_alpaca: deep-learning, language-model, instruction-following; Also covers LLM Frameworks.

### When should I avoid Spearmint?

Last GitHub push was 2388 days ago (dormant maintenance, Dec 27, 2019). Validate activity before betting a new project on Spearmint. Vector Databases: Don't reach for a dedicated vector DB under ~100k vectors; pgvector on your existing Postgres is simpler to operate. Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge.

### When should I avoid stanford_alpaca?

Last GitHub push was 724 days ago (dormant maintenance, Jul 17, 2024). Validate activity before betting a new project on stanford_alpaca. Vector Databases: Don't reach for a dedicated vector DB under ~100k vectors; pgvector on your existing Postgres is simpler to operate. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge.

### Is Spearmint or stanford_alpaca more popular on GitHub?

stanford_alpaca has more GitHub stars (30,250 vs 1,570). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are Spearmint and stanford_alpaca open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (Spearmint: Other, stanford_alpaca: Apache-2.0).

### Where can I find alternatives to Spearmint or stanford_alpaca?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [Spearmint alternatives](/tools/hips-spearmint/alternatives) and [stanford_alpaca alternatives](/tools/tatsu-lab-stanford-alpaca/alternatives) ([Spearmint markdown twin](/tools/hips-spearmint/alternatives.md), [stanford_alpaca markdown twin](/tools/tatsu-lab-stanford-alpaca/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/hips-spearmint-vs-tatsu-lab-stanford-alpaca.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, Spearmint or stanford_alpaca?

Spearmint: Dormant. stanford_alpaca: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for Spearmint and stanford_alpaca?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [Spearmint trust report](/tools/hips-spearmint/trust); [stanford_alpaca trust report](/tools/tatsu-lab-stanford-alpaca/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=hips-spearmint`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=hips-spearmint)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
