---
title: "LlamaFactory vs llm-action"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/hiyouga-llamafactory-vs-liguodongiot-llm-action"
tools: ["hiyouga-llamafactory", "liguodongiot-llm-action"]
---

# LlamaFactory vs llm-action

*GraphCanon updated Aug 16, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick LlamaFactory if llamaFactory is a sophisticated tool for fine-tuning numerous large language models and visual language models efficiently using various methods such as LoRA, QLoRA, RLHF, and quantization; pick llm-action if llm-action aims to share large model technology principles and practical experiences covering areas such as engineering, deployment, inference, serving, and training.

[LlamaFactory](https://llamafactory.readthedocs.io) reports 74k GitHub stars, 9.1k forks, and 1.1k open issues, last pushed Aug 13, 2026. [llm-action](https://www.zhihu.com/column/c_1456193767213043713) has 25k stars, 2.8k forks, and 19 open issues, last pushed Jul 19, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [LlamaFactory's repository](https://github.com/hiyouga/LlamaFactory) and [llm-action's repository](https://github.com/liguodongiot/llm-action).

| | [LlamaFactory](/tools/hiyouga-llamafactory.md) | [llm-action](/tools/liguodongiot-llm-action.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ LLMs & VLMs | Aims to share large model technology principles and practical experience (large model engineering, application implementation) |
| Stars | 74,132 | 24,898 |
| Forks | 9,071 | 2,842 |
| Open issues | 1,113 | 19 |
| Language | Python | HTML |
| Adopt for | LlamaFactory is a sophisticated tool for fine-tuning numerous large language models and visual language models efficiently using various methods such as LoRA, QLoRA, RLHF, and quantization. | llm-action aims to share large model technology principles and practical experiences covering areas such as engineering, deployment, inference, serving, and training. |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | Apache-2.0 | llm-action is open-source under the Apache-2.0 license. |
| Categories | LLM Frameworks, Model Training | Inference & Serving, LLM Frameworks, Model Training |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [LlamaFactory](/tools/hiyouga-llamafactory.md) | [llm-action](/tools/liguodongiot-llm-action.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maintenance | Very active (96%) | Active (82%) |
| Days since push | 2d | 28d |
| Open issues (now) | 1.1k | 19 |
| Stars delta | +803 (30d) | +162 (30d) |
| Open issues delta | +39 (30d) | +1 (30d) |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/hiyouga-llamafactory/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/liguodongiot-llm-action/trust.md) |

**Typed relationship:** LlamaFactory _(related)_ llm-action

## Decision facts: LlamaFactory

- **Adopt for:** LlamaFactory is a sophisticated tool for fine-tuning numerous large language models and visual language models efficiently using various methods such as LoRA, QLoRA, RLHF, and quantization.

## Decision facts: llm-action

- **Adopt for:** llm-action aims to share large model technology principles and practical experiences covering areas such as engineering, deployment, inference, serving, and training.
- **License detail:** llm-action is open-source under the Apache-2.0 license.

## Choose when

### Choose LlamaFactory if…

- LlamaFactory is primarily Python; llm-action is HTML.
- Graph edge: LlamaFactory is a typed related of llm-action - see the relationship row above.
- Tags unique to LlamaFactory: agent, ai, deepseek, fine-tuning.
- When you need to fine-tune over 100 different LLMs or VLMs with efficient methods like LoRA or QLoRA.

### Choose llm-action if…

- llm-action is primarily HTML; LlamaFactory is Python.
- Graph edge: llm-action is a typed related of LlamaFactory - see the relationship row above.
- Tags unique to llm-action: deployment, engineering, inference, large model.
- Also covers Inference & Serving.
- - When you need detailed examples and best practices of implementing large language models (LLMs) in real-world applications, llm-action provides insights into the challenges faced during LLM's actual

## When NOT to use LlamaFactory

- When you are looking to fine-tune less popular or niche models that are not supported within the 100+ models covered by LlamaFactory.
- If your project specifically requires custom fine-tuning methods not available in this repository, such as certain versions of PEFT (Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning) techniques excluding LoRA and QLoa

## When NOT to use llm-action

- - If your focus is narrowly on cutting-edge research rather than practical implementation details, llm-action may not be the best resource as it focuses more on deployment processes.
- - When looking for a full-stack solution that includes detailed code implementations and libraries for each phase (training, serving), llm-action might fall short. It shines in sharing knowledge but

## Common questions

### What is the difference between LlamaFactory and llm-action?

LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ LLMs & VLMs. llm-action: Aims to share large model technology principles and practical experience (large model engineering, application implementation). See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose LlamaFactory over llm-action?

Choose LlamaFactory over llm-action when LlamaFactory is primarily Python; llm-action is HTML; Graph edge: LlamaFactory is a typed related of llm-action - see the relationship row above; Tags unique to LlamaFactory: agent, ai, deepseek, fine-tuning; When you need to fine-tune over 100 different LLMs or VLMs with efficient methods like LoRA or QLoRA.

### When should I choose llm-action over LlamaFactory?

Choose llm-action over LlamaFactory when llm-action is primarily HTML; LlamaFactory is Python; Graph edge: llm-action is a typed related of LlamaFactory - see the relationship row above; Tags unique to llm-action: deployment, engineering, inference, large model; Also covers Inference & Serving; - When you need detailed examples and best practices of implementing large language models (LLMs) in real-world applications, llm-action provides insights into the challenges faced during LLM's actual.

### When should I avoid LlamaFactory?

When you are looking to fine-tune less popular or niche models that are not supported within the 100+ models covered by LlamaFactory. If your project specifically requires custom fine-tuning methods not available in this repository, such as certain versions of PEFT (Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning) techniques excluding LoRA and QLoa

### When should I avoid llm-action?

- If your focus is narrowly on cutting-edge research rather than practical implementation details, llm-action may not be the best resource as it focuses more on deployment processes. - When looking for a full-stack solution that includes detailed code implementations and libraries for each phase (training, serving), llm-action might fall short. It shines in sharing knowledge but

### Is LlamaFactory or llm-action more popular on GitHub?

LlamaFactory has more GitHub stars (74,132 vs 24,898). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are LlamaFactory and llm-action open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (LlamaFactory: Apache-2.0, llm-action: Apache-2.0).

### Where can I find alternatives to LlamaFactory or llm-action?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [LlamaFactory alternatives](/tools/hiyouga-llamafactory/alternatives) and [llm-action alternatives](/tools/liguodongiot-llm-action/alternatives) ([LlamaFactory markdown twin](/tools/hiyouga-llamafactory/alternatives.md), [llm-action markdown twin](/tools/liguodongiot-llm-action/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/hiyouga-llamafactory-vs-liguodongiot-llm-action.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, LlamaFactory or llm-action?

LlamaFactory: Very active. llm-action: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for LlamaFactory and llm-action?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [LlamaFactory trust report](/tools/hiyouga-llamafactory/trust); [llm-action trust report](/tools/liguodongiot-llm-action/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=hiyouga-llamafactory`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=hiyouga-llamafactory)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
