---
title: "LlamaFactory vs Eagle"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/hiyouga-llamafactory-vs-nvlabs-eagle"
tools: ["hiyouga-llamafactory", "nvlabs-eagle"]
---

# LlamaFactory vs Eagle

*GraphCanon updated Jul 12, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick LlamaFactory when tags unique to LlamaFactory: gemma, fine-tuning, deepseek, ai; pick Eagle when tags unique to Eagle: llama, gpt4, eagle, demo.

[LlamaFactory](https://llamafactory.readthedocs.io) reports 73k GitHub stars, 8.9k forks, and 1.1k open issues, last pushed Jul 10, 2026. [Eagle](https://nvlabs.github.io/Eagle/) has 3.2k stars, 301 forks, and 57 open issues, last pushed Jun 24, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [LlamaFactory's repository](https://github.com/hiyouga/LlamaFactory) and [Eagle's repository](https://github.com/NVlabs/Eagle).

| | [LlamaFactory](/tools/hiyouga-llamafactory.md) | [Eagle](/tools/nvlabs-eagle.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ LLMs & VLMs | Eagle: Frontier Vision-Language Models with Data-Centric Strategies |
| Stars | 73,157 | 3,159 |
| Forks | 8,937 | 301 |
| Open issues | 1,067 | 57 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Adopt for | LlamaFactory is a sophisticated tool for fine-tuning numerous large language models and visual language models efficiently using various methods such as LoRA, QLoRA, RLHF, and quantization. | - |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Categories | LLM Frameworks, Model Training | LLM Frameworks, Model Training, Computer Vision |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [LlamaFactory](/tools/hiyouga-llamafactory.md) | [Eagle](/tools/nvlabs-eagle.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maintenance | Very active (96%) | Active (82%) |
| Days since push | 0d | 16d |
| Open issues (now) | 1.1k | 57 |
| Owner type | User | Organization |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/hiyouga-llamafactory/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/nvlabs-eagle/trust.md) |

## Decision facts: LlamaFactory

- **Adopt for:** LlamaFactory is a sophisticated tool for fine-tuning numerous large language models and visual language models efficiently using various methods such as LoRA, QLoRA, RLHF, and quantization.

## Choose when

### Choose LlamaFactory if…

- Tags unique to LlamaFactory: gemma, fine-tuning, deepseek, ai.
- When you need to fine-tune over 100 different LLMs or VLMs with efficient methods like LoRA or QLoRA.
- More GitHub stars (73k vs 3.2k) - visibility, not fit.

### Choose Eagle if…

- Tags unique to Eagle: llama, gpt4, eagle, demo.
- Also covers Computer Vision.
- Leaner open-issue backlog (57).

## When NOT to use LlamaFactory

- When you are looking to fine-tune less popular or niche models that are not supported within the 100+ models covered by LlamaFactory.
- If your project specifically requires custom fine-tuning methods not available in this repository, such as certain versions of PEFT (Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning) techniques excluding LoRA and QLoa

## When NOT to use Eagle

- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
- Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge.

## Common questions

### What is the difference between LlamaFactory and Eagle?

LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ LLMs & VLMs. Eagle: Eagle: Frontier Vision-Language Models with Data-Centric Strategies. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose LlamaFactory over Eagle?

Choose LlamaFactory over Eagle when Tags unique to LlamaFactory: gemma, fine-tuning, deepseek, ai; When you need to fine-tune over 100 different LLMs or VLMs with efficient methods like LoRA or QLoRA; More GitHub stars (73k vs 3.2k) - visibility, not fit.

### When should I choose Eagle over LlamaFactory?

Choose Eagle over LlamaFactory when Tags unique to Eagle: llama, gpt4, eagle, demo; Also covers Computer Vision; Leaner open-issue backlog (57).

### When should I avoid LlamaFactory?

When you are looking to fine-tune less popular or niche models that are not supported within the 100+ models covered by LlamaFactory. If your project specifically requires custom fine-tuning methods not available in this repository, such as certain versions of PEFT (Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning) techniques excluding LoRA and QLoa

### When should I avoid Eagle?

LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge.

### Is LlamaFactory or Eagle more popular on GitHub?

LlamaFactory has more GitHub stars (73,157 vs 3,159). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are LlamaFactory and Eagle open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (LlamaFactory: Apache-2.0, Eagle: Apache-2.0).

### Where can I find alternatives to LlamaFactory or Eagle?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [LlamaFactory alternatives](/tools/hiyouga-llamafactory/alternatives) and [Eagle alternatives](/tools/nvlabs-eagle/alternatives) ([LlamaFactory markdown twin](/tools/hiyouga-llamafactory/alternatives.md), [Eagle markdown twin](/tools/nvlabs-eagle/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/hiyouga-llamafactory-vs-nvlabs-eagle.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, LlamaFactory or Eagle?

LlamaFactory: Very active. Eagle: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for LlamaFactory and Eagle?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [LlamaFactory trust report](/tools/hiyouga-llamafactory/trust); [Eagle trust report](/tools/nvlabs-eagle/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=hiyouga-llamafactory`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=hiyouga-llamafactory)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
