--- title: "LlamaFactory vs speech_recognition" type: "comparison" canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/hiyouga-llamafactory-vs-uberi-speech-recognition" tools: ["hiyouga-llamafactory", "uberi-speech-recognition"] --- # LlamaFactory vs speech_recognition *GraphCanon updated Jul 11, 2026* ## Verdict Pick LlamaFactory when license: LlamaFactory is Apache-2.0, speech_recognition is BSD-3-Clause; pick speech_recognition when license: speech_recognition is BSD-3-Clause, LlamaFactory is Apache-2.0. [LlamaFactory](https://llamafactory.readthedocs.io) reports 73k GitHub stars, 8.9k forks, and 1.1k open issues, last pushed Jul 10, 2026. [speech_recognition](https://pypi.python.org/pypi/SpeechRecognition/) has 9.0k stars, 2.4k forks, and 317 open issues, last pushed Jun 16, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [LlamaFactory's repository](https://github.com/hiyouga/LlamaFactory) and [speech_recognition's repository](https://github.com/Uberi/speech_recognition). | | [LlamaFactory](/tools/hiyouga-llamafactory.md) | [speech_recognition](/tools/uberi-speech-recognition.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Tagline | Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ LLMs & VLMs | Speech recognition module for Python, supporting several engines and APIs, online and offline. | | Stars | 73,157 | 8,971 | | Forks | 8,937 | 2,417 | | Open issues | 1,067 | 317 | | Language | Python | Python | | Adopt for | LlamaFactory is a sophisticated tool for fine-tuning numerous large language models and visual language models efficiently using various methods such as LoRA, QLoRA, RLHF, and quantization. | - | | Persona | - | - | | Runtime | - | - | | License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause | | Categories | LLM Frameworks, Model Training | AI Agents, LLM Frameworks, Model Training | ## Trust and health _Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._ | | [LlamaFactory](/tools/hiyouga-llamafactory.md) | [speech_recognition](/tools/uberi-speech-recognition.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Maintenance | Very active (96%) | Active (82%) | | Days since push | 0d | 24d | | Open issues (now) | 1.1k | 317 | | Full report | [trust report](/tools/hiyouga-llamafactory/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/uberi-speech-recognition/trust.md) | ## Decision facts: LlamaFactory - **Adopt for:** LlamaFactory is a sophisticated tool for fine-tuning numerous large language models and visual language models efficiently using various methods such as LoRA, QLoRA, RLHF, and quantization. ## Choose when ### Choose LlamaFactory if… - License: LlamaFactory is Apache-2.0, speech_recognition is BSD-3-Clause. - Tags unique to LlamaFactory: agent, ai, deepseek, fine-tuning. - When you need to fine-tune over 100 different LLMs or VLMs with efficient methods like LoRA or QLoRA. ### Choose speech_recognition if… - License: speech_recognition is BSD-3-Clause, LlamaFactory is Apache-2.0. - Tags unique to speech_recognition: audio, python, speech-recognition, speech-to-text. - Also covers AI Agents. ## When NOT to use LlamaFactory - When you are looking to fine-tune less popular or niche models that are not supported within the 100+ models covered by LlamaFactory. - If your project specifically requires custom fine-tuning methods not available in this repository, such as certain versions of PEFT (Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning) techniques excluding LoRA and QLoa ## When NOT to use speech_recognition - AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. - LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. - Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge. ## Common questions ### What is the difference between LlamaFactory and speech_recognition? LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ LLMs & VLMs. speech_recognition: Speech recognition module for Python, supporting several engines and APIs, online and offline.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories. ### When should I choose LlamaFactory over speech_recognition? Choose LlamaFactory over speech_recognition when License: LlamaFactory is Apache-2.0, speech_recognition is BSD-3-Clause; Tags unique to LlamaFactory: agent, ai, deepseek, fine-tuning; When you need to fine-tune over 100 different LLMs or VLMs with efficient methods like LoRA or QLoRA. ### When should I choose speech_recognition over LlamaFactory? Choose speech_recognition over LlamaFactory when License: speech_recognition is BSD-3-Clause, LlamaFactory is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to speech_recognition: audio, python, speech-recognition, speech-to-text; Also covers AI Agents. ### When should I avoid LlamaFactory? When you are looking to fine-tune less popular or niche models that are not supported within the 100+ models covered by LlamaFactory. If your project specifically requires custom fine-tuning methods not available in this repository, such as certain versions of PEFT (Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning) techniques excluding LoRA and QLoa ### When should I avoid speech_recognition? AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge. ### Is LlamaFactory or speech_recognition more popular on GitHub? LlamaFactory has more GitHub stars (73,157 vs 8,971). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints. ### Are LlamaFactory and speech_recognition open source? Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (LlamaFactory: Apache-2.0, speech_recognition: BSD-3-Clause). ### Where can I find alternatives to LlamaFactory or speech_recognition? GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [LlamaFactory alternatives](/tools/hiyouga-llamafactory/alternatives) and [speech_recognition alternatives](/tools/uberi-speech-recognition/alternatives) ([LlamaFactory markdown twin](/tools/hiyouga-llamafactory/alternatives.md), [speech_recognition markdown twin](/tools/uberi-speech-recognition/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes. ### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison? Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/hiyouga-llamafactory-vs-uberi-speech-recognition.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers. ### Which is better maintained, LlamaFactory or speech_recognition? LlamaFactory: Very active. speech_recognition: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance. ### Where are the full trust reports for LlamaFactory and speech_recognition? GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [LlamaFactory trust report](/tools/hiyouga-llamafactory/trust); [speech_recognition trust report](/tools/uberi-speech-recognition/trust). --- **Machine-readable endpoints** - JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=hiyouga-llamafactory`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=hiyouga-llamafactory) - LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt) - Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt) _GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_