---
title: "LlamaFactory vs circle-guard-bench"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/hiyouga-llamafactory-vs-whitecircle-circle-guard-bench"
tools: ["hiyouga-llamafactory", "whitecircle-circle-guard-bench"]
---

# LlamaFactory vs circle-guard-bench

*GraphCanon updated Jul 15, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick LlamaFactory when tags unique to LlamaFactory: agent, deepseek, fine-tuning, gemma; pick circle-guard-bench when tags unique to circle-guard-bench: benchmark, benchmarking, guardrail, guardrails.

[LlamaFactory](https://llamafactory.readthedocs.io) reports 73k GitHub stars, 8.9k forks, and 1.1k open issues, last pushed Jul 10, 2026. [circle-guard-bench](https://whitecircle.ai) has 70 stars, 5 forks, and 0 open issues, last pushed Mar 7, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [LlamaFactory's repository](https://github.com/hiyouga/LlamaFactory) and [circle-guard-bench's repository](https://github.com/whitecircle/circle-guard-bench).

| | [LlamaFactory](/tools/hiyouga-llamafactory.md) | [circle-guard-bench](/tools/whitecircle-circle-guard-bench.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ LLMs & VLMs | First-of-its-kind AI benchmark for evaluating the protection capabilities of large language model (LLM) guard systems (guardrails and safeguards) |
| Stars | 73,157 | 70 |
| Forks | 8,937 | 5 |
| Open issues | 1,067 | 0 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Adopt for | LlamaFactory is a sophisticated tool for fine-tuning numerous large language models and visual language models efficiently using various methods such as LoRA, QLoRA, RLHF, and quantization. | - |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Categories | LLM Frameworks, Model Training | Inference & Serving, LLM Frameworks, Model Training |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [LlamaFactory](/tools/hiyouga-llamafactory.md) | [circle-guard-bench](/tools/whitecircle-circle-guard-bench.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maintenance | Very active (96%) | Slowing (36%) |
| Days since push | 0d | 129d |
| Open issues (now) | 1.1k | 0 |
| Owner type | User | Organization |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/hiyouga-llamafactory/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/whitecircle-circle-guard-bench/trust.md) |

## Decision facts: LlamaFactory

- **Adopt for:** LlamaFactory is a sophisticated tool for fine-tuning numerous large language models and visual language models efficiently using various methods such as LoRA, QLoRA, RLHF, and quantization.

## Choose when

### Choose LlamaFactory if…

- Tags unique to LlamaFactory: agent, deepseek, fine-tuning, gemma.
- When you need to fine-tune over 100 different LLMs or VLMs with efficient methods like LoRA or QLoRA.
- More GitHub stars (73k vs 70) - visibility, not fit.

### Choose circle-guard-bench if…

- Tags unique to circle-guard-bench: benchmark, benchmarking, guardrail, guardrails.
- Also covers Inference & Serving.
- Leaner open-issue backlog (0).

## When NOT to use LlamaFactory

- When you are looking to fine-tune less popular or niche models that are not supported within the 100+ models covered by LlamaFactory.
- If your project specifically requires custom fine-tuning methods not available in this repository, such as certain versions of PEFT (Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning) techniques excluding LoRA and QLoa

## When NOT to use circle-guard-bench

- Last GitHub push was 130 days ago (slowing maintenance, Mar 7, 2026). Validate activity before betting a new project on circle-guard-bench.
- Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
- Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge.

## Common questions

### What is the difference between LlamaFactory and circle-guard-bench?

LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ LLMs & VLMs. circle-guard-bench: First-of-its-kind AI benchmark for evaluating the protection capabilities of large language model (LLM) guard systems (guardrails and safeguards). See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose LlamaFactory over circle-guard-bench?

Choose LlamaFactory over circle-guard-bench when Tags unique to LlamaFactory: agent, deepseek, fine-tuning, gemma; When you need to fine-tune over 100 different LLMs or VLMs with efficient methods like LoRA or QLoRA; More GitHub stars (73k vs 70) - visibility, not fit.

### When should I choose circle-guard-bench over LlamaFactory?

Choose circle-guard-bench over LlamaFactory when Tags unique to circle-guard-bench: benchmark, benchmarking, guardrail, guardrails; Also covers Inference & Serving; Leaner open-issue backlog (0).

### When should I avoid LlamaFactory?

When you are looking to fine-tune less popular or niche models that are not supported within the 100+ models covered by LlamaFactory. If your project specifically requires custom fine-tuning methods not available in this repository, such as certain versions of PEFT (Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning) techniques excluding LoRA and QLoa

### When should I avoid circle-guard-bench?

Last GitHub push was 130 days ago (slowing maintenance, Mar 7, 2026). Validate activity before betting a new project on circle-guard-bench. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge.

### Is LlamaFactory or circle-guard-bench more popular on GitHub?

LlamaFactory has more GitHub stars (73,157 vs 70). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are LlamaFactory and circle-guard-bench open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (LlamaFactory: Apache-2.0, circle-guard-bench: Apache-2.0).

### Where can I find alternatives to LlamaFactory or circle-guard-bench?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [LlamaFactory alternatives](/tools/hiyouga-llamafactory/alternatives) and [circle-guard-bench alternatives](/tools/whitecircle-circle-guard-bench/alternatives) ([LlamaFactory markdown twin](/tools/hiyouga-llamafactory/alternatives.md), [circle-guard-bench markdown twin](/tools/whitecircle-circle-guard-bench/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/hiyouga-llamafactory-vs-whitecircle-circle-guard-bench.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, LlamaFactory or circle-guard-bench?

LlamaFactory: Very active. circle-guard-bench: Slowing. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for LlamaFactory and circle-guard-bench?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [LlamaFactory trust report](/tools/hiyouga-llamafactory/trust); [circle-guard-bench trust report](/tools/whitecircle-circle-guard-bench/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=hiyouga-llamafactory`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=hiyouga-llamafactory)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
