---
title: "HLCE vs FastChat"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/humanity-s-last-code-exam-hlce-vs-lm-sys-fastchat"
tools: ["humanity-s-last-code-exam-hlce", "lm-sys-fastchat"]
---

# HLCE vs FastChat

*GraphCanon updated Jul 15, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick HLCE when tags unique to HLCE: benchmark, codegen, codellm, llm; pick FastChat when tags unique to FastChat: chatbots, distributed-serving, evaluation system, large-language-models.

[HLCE](https://humanity-s-last-code-exam.github.io/website/) reports 96 GitHub stars, 8 forks, and 1 open issues, last pushed Aug 21, 2025. [FastChat](https://github.com/lm-sys/FastChat) has 39k stars, 4.8k forks, and 1.0k open issues, last pushed May 1, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [HLCE's repository](https://github.com/Humanity-s-Last-Code-Exam/HLCE) and [FastChat's repository](https://github.com/lm-sys/FastChat).

| | [HLCE](/tools/humanity-s-last-code-exam-hlce.md) | [FastChat](/tools/lm-sys-fastchat.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | (EMNLP 2025 Findings) Source Evaluation scripts for Humanity's Last Code Exam | An open platform for training, serving, and evaluating large language models |
| Stars | 96 | 39,494 |
| Forks | 8 | 4,786 |
| Open issues | 1 | 1,027 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Adopt for | - | FastChat is a comprehensive open platform for managing large language models (LLMs) that includes capabilities for training, serving, evaluating, and comparing chatbot models via web UIs and RESTful APIs. It powers ChatB |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | - | Apache-2.0 |
| Categories | Evaluation & Observability, LLM Frameworks | Evaluation & Observability, Inference & Serving, LLM Frameworks, Model Training |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [HLCE](/tools/humanity-s-last-code-exam-hlce.md) | [FastChat](/tools/lm-sys-fastchat.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maintenance | Slowing (36%) | Steady (60%) |
| Days since push | 328d | 74d |
| Open issues (now) | 1 | 1.0k |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/humanity-s-last-code-exam-hlce/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/lm-sys-fastchat/trust.md) |

## Decision facts: FastChat

- **Adopt for:** FastChat is a comprehensive open platform for managing large language models (LLMs) that includes capabilities for training, serving, evaluating, and comparing chatbot models via web UIs and RESTful APIs. It powers ChatB

## Choose when

### Choose HLCE if…

- Tags unique to HLCE: benchmark, codegen, codellm, llm.
- Leaner open-issue backlog (1).

### Choose FastChat if…

- Tags unique to FastChat: chatbots, distributed-serving, evaluation system, large-language-models.
- Also covers Inference & Serving, Model Training.
- - You are looking to train and evaluate state-of-the-art models such as Vicuna or MT-Bench.

## When NOT to use HLCE

- Last GitHub push was 328 days ago (slowing maintenance, Aug 21, 2025). Validate activity before betting a new project on HLCE.
- Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers.
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.

## When NOT to use FastChat

- - You require a proprietary or closed-source framework; FastChat is open-source under Apache-2.0 license and its use might be unsuitable for environments requiring proprietary solutions.
- - Your chatbot evaluation needs do not align with the types of data used in FastChat's datasets (e.g., human votes, MT-Bench evaluations).
- - You prefer a more user-friendly setup without the need to clone a repository and manually install dependencies; FastChat requires installation from source with additional steps for Rust and CMake on
- + Mac.

## Common questions

### What is the difference between HLCE and FastChat?

HLCE: (EMNLP 2025 Findings) Source Evaluation scripts for Humanity's Last Code Exam. FastChat: An open platform for training, serving, and evaluating large language models. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose HLCE over FastChat?

Choose HLCE over FastChat when Tags unique to HLCE: benchmark, codegen, codellm, llm; Leaner open-issue backlog (1).

### When should I choose FastChat over HLCE?

Choose FastChat over HLCE when Tags unique to FastChat: chatbots, distributed-serving, evaluation system, large-language-models; Also covers Inference & Serving, Model Training; - You are looking to train and evaluate state-of-the-art models such as Vicuna or MT-Bench.

### When should I avoid HLCE?

Last GitHub push was 328 days ago (slowing maintenance, Aug 21, 2025). Validate activity before betting a new project on HLCE. Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.

### When should I avoid FastChat?

- You require a proprietary or closed-source framework; FastChat is open-source under Apache-2.0 license and its use might be unsuitable for environments requiring proprietary solutions. - Your chatbot evaluation needs do not align with the types of data used in FastChat's datasets (e.g., human votes, MT-Bench evaluations). - You prefer a more user-friendly setup without the need to clone a repository and manually install dependencies; FastChat requires installation from source with additional steps for Rust and CMake on + Mac.

### Is HLCE or FastChat more popular on GitHub?

FastChat has more GitHub stars (39,494 vs 96). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are HLCE and FastChat open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub.

### Where can I find alternatives to HLCE or FastChat?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [HLCE alternatives](/tools/humanity-s-last-code-exam-hlce/alternatives) and [FastChat alternatives](/tools/lm-sys-fastchat/alternatives) ([HLCE markdown twin](/tools/humanity-s-last-code-exam-hlce/alternatives.md), [FastChat markdown twin](/tools/lm-sys-fastchat/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/humanity-s-last-code-exam-hlce-vs-lm-sys-fastchat.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, HLCE or FastChat?

HLCE: Slowing. FastChat: Steady. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for HLCE and FastChat?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [HLCE trust report](/tools/humanity-s-last-code-exam-hlce/trust); [FastChat trust report](/tools/lm-sys-fastchat/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=humanity-s-last-code-exam-hlce`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=humanity-s-last-code-exam-hlce)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
