---
title: "surogate vs LLMs-from-scratch"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/invergent-ai-surogate-vs-rasbt-llms-from-scratch"
tools: ["invergent-ai-surogate", "rasbt-llms-from-scratch"]
---

# surogate vs LLMs-from-scratch

*GraphCanon updated Jul 11, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick surogate when surogate is primarily C++; LLMs-from-scratch is Jupyter Notebook; pick LLMs-from-scratch when lLMs-from-scratch is primarily Jupyter Notebook; surogate is C++.

[surogate](https://surogate.ai) reports 806 GitHub stars, 6 forks, and 7 open issues, last pushed Jul 7, 2026. [LLMs-from-scratch](https://amzn.to/4fqvn0D) has 99k stars, 15k forks, and 4 open issues, last pushed Jun 2, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [surogate's repository](https://github.com/invergent-ai/surogate) and [LLMs-from-scratch's repository](https://github.com/rasbt/LLMs-from-scratch).

| | [surogate](/tools/invergent-ai-surogate.md) | [LLMs-from-scratch](/tools/rasbt-llms-from-scratch.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | Training/Fine-tuning at the speed of light | Implement a ChatGPT-like LLM in PyTorch from scratch, step by step |
| Stars | 806 | 98,899 |
| Forks | 6 | 15,183 |
| Open issues | 7 | 4 |
| Language | C++ | Jupyter Notebook |
| Adopt for | - | LLMs-from-scratch is a project-oriented repository aimed at building PyTorch-based language models from the ground up, with detailed step-by-step instructions. |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Categories | LLM Frameworks, Model Training | LLM Frameworks, Model Training |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [surogate](/tools/invergent-ai-surogate.md) | [LLMs-from-scratch](/tools/rasbt-llms-from-scratch.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maintenance | Very active (96%) | Steady (60%) |
| Days since push | 4d | 38d |
| Open issues (now) | 7 | 4 |
| Owner type | Organization | User |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/invergent-ai-surogate/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/rasbt-llms-from-scratch/trust.md) |

## Decision facts: LLMs-from-scratch

- **Adopt for:** LLMs-from-scratch is a project-oriented repository aimed at building PyTorch-based language models from the ground up, with detailed step-by-step instructions.

## Choose when

### Choose surogate if…

- surogate is primarily C++; LLMs-from-scratch is Jupyter Notebook.
- License: surogate is Apache-2.0, LLMs-from-scratch is Other.
- Tags unique to surogate: cuda, fine-tuning, llama, llm.

### Choose LLMs-from-scratch if…

- LLMs-from-scratch is primarily Jupyter Notebook; surogate is C++.
- License: LLMs-from-scratch is Other, surogate is Apache-2.0.
- Tags unique to LLMs-from-scratch: ai, artificial-intelligence, attention mechanism, finetuning.
- - You are an advanced practitioner aiming to fully understand the underpinnings of LLMs using PyTorch as your primary framework.

## When NOT to use surogate

- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
- Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge.

## When NOT to use LLMs-from-scratch

- - If you are looking for a rapid deployment of an LLM without understanding its intricate structure - this tool requires extensive manual and conceptual work.
- - You prefer frameworks with automatic model generation or other high-level abstractions that simplify the process. This repository emphasizes manual creation, which is more time-consuming but offers丰
- a deeper learning experience.

## Common questions

### What is the difference between surogate and LLMs-from-scratch?

surogate: Training/Fine-tuning at the speed of light. LLMs-from-scratch: Implement a ChatGPT-like LLM in PyTorch from scratch, step by step. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose surogate over LLMs-from-scratch?

Choose surogate over LLMs-from-scratch when surogate is primarily C++; LLMs-from-scratch is Jupyter Notebook; License: surogate is Apache-2.0, LLMs-from-scratch is Other; Tags unique to surogate: cuda, fine-tuning, llama, llm.

### When should I choose LLMs-from-scratch over surogate?

Choose LLMs-from-scratch over surogate when LLMs-from-scratch is primarily Jupyter Notebook; surogate is C++; License: LLMs-from-scratch is Other, surogate is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to LLMs-from-scratch: ai, artificial-intelligence, attention mechanism, finetuning; - You are an advanced practitioner aiming to fully understand the underpinnings of LLMs using PyTorch as your primary framework.

### When should I avoid surogate?

LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge.

### When should I avoid LLMs-from-scratch?

- If you are looking for a rapid deployment of an LLM without understanding its intricate structure - this tool requires extensive manual and conceptual work. - You prefer frameworks with automatic model generation or other high-level abstractions that simplify the process. This repository emphasizes manual creation, which is more time-consuming but offers丰 a deeper learning experience.

### Is surogate or LLMs-from-scratch more popular on GitHub?

LLMs-from-scratch has more GitHub stars (98,899 vs 806). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are surogate and LLMs-from-scratch open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (surogate: Apache-2.0, LLMs-from-scratch: Other).

### Where can I find alternatives to surogate or LLMs-from-scratch?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [surogate alternatives](/tools/invergent-ai-surogate/alternatives) and [LLMs-from-scratch alternatives](/tools/rasbt-llms-from-scratch/alternatives) ([surogate markdown twin](/tools/invergent-ai-surogate/alternatives.md), [LLMs-from-scratch markdown twin](/tools/rasbt-llms-from-scratch/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/invergent-ai-surogate-vs-rasbt-llms-from-scratch.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, surogate or LLMs-from-scratch?

surogate: Very active. LLMs-from-scratch: Steady. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for surogate and LLMs-from-scratch?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [surogate trust report](/tools/invergent-ai-surogate/trust); [LLMs-from-scratch trust report](/tools/rasbt-llms-from-scratch/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=invergent-ai-surogate`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=invergent-ai-surogate)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
