---
title: "kaldi vs annyang"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/kaldi-asr-kaldi-vs-talater-annyang"
tools: ["kaldi-asr-kaldi", "talater-annyang"]
---

# kaldi vs annyang

*GraphCanon updated Jul 30, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick kaldi if kaldi stands out among speech recognition toolkits with its comprehensive C++ libraries and strong community support for contributors; pick annyang if annyang enables speech-to-text capabilities for web sites with its TypeScript-based JavaScript library.

[kaldi](http://kaldi-asr.org) reports 15k GitHub stars, 5.4k forks, and 260 open issues, last pushed Sep 22, 2025. [annyang](https://www.talater.com/annyang/) has 6.8k stars, 1.0k forks, and 10 open issues, last pushed Jul 14, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [kaldi's repository](https://github.com/kaldi-asr/kaldi) and [annyang's repository](https://github.com/TalAter/annyang).

| | [kaldi](/tools/kaldi-asr-kaldi.md) | [annyang](/tools/talater-annyang.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | Kaldi Speech Recognition Toolkit | Speech recognition for your site |
| Stars | 15,442 | 6,818 |
| Forks | 5,355 | 1,048 |
| Open issues | 260 | 10 |
| Language | Shell | TypeScript |
| Adopt for | Kaldi stands out among speech recognition toolkits with its comprehensive C++ libraries and strong community support for contributors. | annyang enables speech-to-text capabilities for web sites with its TypeScript-based JavaScript library. |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | Other | MIT License: Permissive free software license notice that gives users the freedom to modify and redistribute as long as they provide source credit. |
| Categories | Speech & Audio | Speech & Audio |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [kaldi](/tools/kaldi-asr-kaldi.md) | [annyang](/tools/talater-annyang.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maintenance | Slowing (36%) | Active (82%) |
| Days since push | 310d | 15d |
| Open issues (now) | 260 | 10 |
| Owner type | Organization | User |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/kaldi-asr-kaldi/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/talater-annyang/trust.md) |

## Decision facts: kaldi

- **Adopt for:** Kaldi stands out among speech recognition toolkits with its comprehensive C++ libraries and strong community support for contributors.

## Decision facts: annyang

- **Pricing:** freemium - Available at no charge with an open-source MIT license, making it suitable for both personal and commercial projects.
- **Adopt for:** annyang enables speech-to-text capabilities for web sites with its TypeScript-based JavaScript library.
- **License detail:** MIT License: Permissive free software license notice that gives users the freedom to modify and redistribute as long as they provide source credit.

## Choose when

### Choose kaldi if…

- kaldi is primarily Shell; annyang is TypeScript.
- License: kaldi is Other, annyang is MIT.
- Tags unique to kaldi: c-plus-plus, cuda, speaker-id, speaker-verification.
- For developers preferring a deep customization of speech recognition algorithms in C++

### Choose annyang if…

- annyang is primarily TypeScript; kaldi is Shell.
- License: annyang is MIT, kaldi is Other.
- Pricing: Available at no charge with an open-source MIT license, making it suitable for both personal and commercial projects..
- Tags unique to annyang: mit-license, speech, voice.
- When you are working on a project that requires integrating voice commands into a website and your tech stack already includes TypeScript or JavaScript.

## When NOT to use kaldi

- If you require extensive pre-built support and documentation for non-UNIX systems like Windows outside Cygwin environment
- For users seeking a purely Python-based ecosystem for developing speech recognition applications without the need to compile C++ code

## When NOT to use annyang

- If the project requires a high level of speech recognition accuracy in noisy environments, as annyang might not perform optimally under such conditions.
- For applications demanding real-time transcription with low latency, considering that annang may introduce some delay which could be critical for certain use cases.

## Common questions

### What is the difference between kaldi and annyang?

kaldi: Kaldi Speech Recognition Toolkit. annyang: Speech recognition for your site. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose kaldi over annyang?

Choose kaldi over annyang when kaldi is primarily Shell; annyang is TypeScript; License: kaldi is Other, annyang is MIT; Tags unique to kaldi: c-plus-plus, cuda, speaker-id, speaker-verification; For developers preferring a deep customization of speech recognition algorithms in C++.

### When should I choose annyang over kaldi?

Choose annyang over kaldi when annyang is primarily TypeScript; kaldi is Shell; License: annyang is MIT, kaldi is Other; Pricing: Available at no charge with an open-source MIT license, making it suitable for both personal and commercial projects.; Tags unique to annyang: mit-license, speech, voice; When you are working on a project that requires integrating voice commands into a website and your tech stack already includes TypeScript or JavaScript.

### When should I avoid kaldi?

If you require extensive pre-built support and documentation for non-UNIX systems like Windows outside Cygwin environment For users seeking a purely Python-based ecosystem for developing speech recognition applications without the need to compile C++ code

### When should I avoid annyang?

If the project requires a high level of speech recognition accuracy in noisy environments, as annyang might not perform optimally under such conditions. For applications demanding real-time transcription with low latency, considering that annang may introduce some delay which could be critical for certain use cases.

### Is kaldi or annyang more popular on GitHub?

kaldi has more GitHub stars (15,442 vs 6,818). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are kaldi and annyang open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (kaldi: Other, annyang: MIT).

### Where can I find alternatives to kaldi or annyang?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [kaldi alternatives](/tools/kaldi-asr-kaldi/alternatives) and [annyang alternatives](/tools/talater-annyang/alternatives) ([kaldi markdown twin](/tools/kaldi-asr-kaldi/alternatives.md), [annyang markdown twin](/tools/talater-annyang/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/kaldi-asr-kaldi-vs-talater-annyang.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, kaldi or annyang?

kaldi: Slowing. annyang: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for kaldi and annyang?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [kaldi trust report](/tools/kaldi-asr-kaldi/trust); [annyang trust report](/tools/talater-annyang/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=kaldi-asr-kaldi`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=kaldi-asr-kaldi)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
