---
title: "Failed-ML vs AI-For-Beginners"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/kennethleungty-failed-ml-vs-microsoft-ai-for-beginners"
tools: ["kennethleungty-failed-ml", "microsoft-ai-for-beginners"]
---

# Failed-ML vs AI-For-Beginners

*GraphCanon updated Jul 11, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick Failed-ML when tags unique to Failed-ML: classification, data-engineering, data-quality, data-science; pick AI-For-Beginners when tags unique to AI-For-Beginners: cnn, gan, machine learning, microsoft-for-beginners.

[Failed-ML](https://towardsdatascience.com/when-ai-goes-astray-high-profile-machine-learning-mishaps-in-the-real-world-26bd58692195) reports 753 GitHub stars, 51 forks, and 0 open issues, last pushed Jun 14, 2024. [AI-For-Beginners](https://github.com/microsoft/AI-For-Beginners) has 52k stars, 11k forks, and 4 open issues, last pushed Jul 8, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [Failed-ML's repository](https://github.com/kennethleungty/Failed-ML) and [AI-For-Beginners's repository](https://github.com/microsoft/AI-For-Beginners).

| | [Failed-ML](/tools/kennethleungty-failed-ml.md) | [AI-For-Beginners](/tools/microsoft-ai-for-beginners.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | Compilation of high-profile real-world examples of failed machine learning projects | 12 Weeks, 24 Lessons, AI for All! |
| Stars | 753 | 52,098 |
| Forks | 51 | 10,536 |
| Open issues | 0 | 4 |
| Language | - | Jupyter Notebook |
| Adopt for | - | - |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Categories | Computer Vision, LLM Frameworks, Model Training | Computer Vision, Model Training, Vector Databases |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [Failed-ML](/tools/kennethleungty-failed-ml.md) | [AI-For-Beginners](/tools/microsoft-ai-for-beginners.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maintenance | Dormant (18%) | Very active (96%) |
| Days since push | 757d | 2d |
| Open issues (now) | 0 | 4 |
| Owner type | User | Organization |
| Security scan | No lockfile | 3 low (3 low) |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/kennethleungty-failed-ml/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/microsoft-ai-for-beginners/trust.md) |

## Choose when

### Choose Failed-ML if…

- Tags unique to Failed-ML: classification, data-engineering, data-quality, data-science.
- Also covers LLM Frameworks.
- Leaner open-issue backlog (0).

### Choose AI-For-Beginners if…

- Tags unique to AI-For-Beginners: cnn, gan, machine learning, microsoft-for-beginners.
- Also covers Vector Databases.
- More GitHub stars (52k vs 753) - visibility, not fit.

## When NOT to use Failed-ML

- Last GitHub push was 758 days ago (dormant maintenance, Jun 14, 2024). Validate activity before betting a new project on Failed-ML.
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
- Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge.

## When NOT to use AI-For-Beginners

- Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge.
- Vector Databases: Don't reach for a dedicated vector DB under ~100k vectors; pgvector on your existing Postgres is simpler to operate.

## Common questions

### What is the difference between Failed-ML and AI-For-Beginners?

Failed-ML: Compilation of high-profile real-world examples of failed machine learning projects. AI-For-Beginners: 12 Weeks, 24 Lessons, AI for All!. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose Failed-ML over AI-For-Beginners?

Choose Failed-ML over AI-For-Beginners when Tags unique to Failed-ML: classification, data-engineering, data-quality, data-science; Also covers LLM Frameworks; Leaner open-issue backlog (0).

### When should I choose AI-For-Beginners over Failed-ML?

Choose AI-For-Beginners over Failed-ML when Tags unique to AI-For-Beginners: cnn, gan, machine learning, microsoft-for-beginners; Also covers Vector Databases; More GitHub stars (52k vs 753) - visibility, not fit.

### When should I avoid Failed-ML?

Last GitHub push was 758 days ago (dormant maintenance, Jun 14, 2024). Validate activity before betting a new project on Failed-ML. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge.

### When should I avoid AI-For-Beginners?

Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge. Vector Databases: Don't reach for a dedicated vector DB under ~100k vectors; pgvector on your existing Postgres is simpler to operate.

### Is Failed-ML or AI-For-Beginners more popular on GitHub?

AI-For-Beginners has more GitHub stars (52,098 vs 753). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are Failed-ML and AI-For-Beginners open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (Failed-ML: MIT, AI-For-Beginners: MIT).

### Where can I find alternatives to Failed-ML or AI-For-Beginners?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [Failed-ML alternatives](/tools/kennethleungty-failed-ml/alternatives) and [AI-For-Beginners alternatives](/tools/microsoft-ai-for-beginners/alternatives) ([Failed-ML markdown twin](/tools/kennethleungty-failed-ml/alternatives.md), [AI-For-Beginners markdown twin](/tools/microsoft-ai-for-beginners/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/kennethleungty-failed-ml-vs-microsoft-ai-for-beginners.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, Failed-ML or AI-For-Beginners?

Failed-ML: Dormant. AI-For-Beginners: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for Failed-ML and AI-For-Beginners?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [Failed-ML trust report](/tools/kennethleungty-failed-ml/trust); [AI-For-Beginners trust report](/tools/microsoft-ai-for-beginners/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=kennethleungty-failed-ml`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=kennethleungty-failed-ml)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
