---
title: "RealtimeTTS vs Amphion"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/koljab-realtimetts-vs-open-mmlab-amphion"
tools: ["koljab-realtimetts", "open-mmlab-amphion"]
---

# RealtimeTTS vs Amphion

*GraphCanon updated Jul 11, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick RealtimeTTS when tags unique to RealtimeTTS: text-to-speech, python, realtime, speech-synthesis; pick Amphion when tags unique to Amphion: audioldm, audio-synthesis, audio-generation, emilia.

[RealtimeTTS](https://github.com/KoljaB/RealtimeTTS) reports 4.0k GitHub stars, 399 forks, and 125 open issues, last pushed May 31, 2026. [Amphion](https://openhlt.github.io/amphion/) has 9.9k stars, 822 forks, and 175 open issues, last pushed Mar 25, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [RealtimeTTS's repository](https://github.com/KoljaB/RealtimeTTS) and [Amphion's repository](https://github.com/open-mmlab/Amphion).

| | [RealtimeTTS](/tools/koljab-realtimetts.md) | [Amphion](/tools/open-mmlab-amphion.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | Converts text to speech in realtime | Amphion (/æmˈfaɪən/) is a toolkit for Audio, Music, and Speech Generation. Its purpose is to support reproducible research and help junior researchers and engineers get started in the field of audio,  |
| Stars | 3,986 | 9,927 |
| Forks | 399 | 822 |
| Open issues | 125 | 175 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Adopt for | - | - |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Categories | Speech & Audio | Inference & Serving, Speech & Audio, Computer Vision |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [RealtimeTTS](/tools/koljab-realtimetts.md) | [Amphion](/tools/open-mmlab-amphion.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maintenance | Steady (60%) | Slowing (36%) |
| Days since push | 40d | 107d |
| Open issues (now) | 125 | 175 |
| Owner type | User | Organization |
| Security scan | No criticals | No lockfile |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/koljab-realtimetts/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/open-mmlab-amphion/trust.md) |

## Shared compatibility

- **Python**: [RealtimeTTS](/tools/koljab-realtimetts.md) - Python runtime; [Amphion](/tools/open-mmlab-amphion.md) - Python runtime

## Choose when

### Choose RealtimeTTS if…

- Tags unique to RealtimeTTS: text-to-speech, python, realtime, speech-synthesis.
- More recently updated (last pushed May 31, 2026).

### Choose Amphion if…

- Tags unique to Amphion: audioldm, audio-synthesis, audio-generation, emilia.
- Also covers Inference & Serving, Computer Vision.
- Amphion ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.

## When NOT to use Amphion

- Last GitHub push was 108 days ago (slowing maintenance, Mar 25, 2026). Validate activity before betting a new project on Amphion.
- Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.

## Common questions

### What is the difference between RealtimeTTS and Amphion?

RealtimeTTS: Converts text to speech in realtime. Amphion: Amphion (/æmˈfaɪən/) is a toolkit for Audio, Music, and Speech Generation. Its purpose is to support reproducible research and help junior researchers and engineers get started in the field of audio, . See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose RealtimeTTS over Amphion?

Choose RealtimeTTS over Amphion when Tags unique to RealtimeTTS: text-to-speech, python, realtime, speech-synthesis; More recently updated (last pushed May 31, 2026).

### When should I choose Amphion over RealtimeTTS?

Choose Amphion over RealtimeTTS when Tags unique to Amphion: audioldm, audio-synthesis, audio-generation, emilia; Also covers Inference & Serving, Computer Vision; Amphion ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.

### When should I avoid Amphion?

Last GitHub push was 108 days ago (slowing maintenance, Mar 25, 2026). Validate activity before betting a new project on Amphion. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.

### Is RealtimeTTS or Amphion more popular on GitHub?

Amphion has more GitHub stars (9,927 vs 3,986). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are RealtimeTTS and Amphion open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (RealtimeTTS: MIT, Amphion: MIT).

### Where can I find alternatives to RealtimeTTS or Amphion?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [RealtimeTTS alternatives](/tools/koljab-realtimetts/alternatives) and [Amphion alternatives](/tools/open-mmlab-amphion/alternatives) ([RealtimeTTS markdown twin](/tools/koljab-realtimetts/alternatives.md), [Amphion markdown twin](/tools/open-mmlab-amphion/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/koljab-realtimetts-vs-open-mmlab-amphion.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, RealtimeTTS or Amphion?

RealtimeTTS: Steady. Amphion: Slowing. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for RealtimeTTS and Amphion?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [RealtimeTTS trust report](/tools/koljab-realtimetts/trust); [Amphion trust report](/tools/open-mmlab-amphion/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=koljab-realtimetts`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=koljab-realtimetts)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
