--- title: "chatgpt-plugin-eval vs agentic_security" type: "comparison" canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/llm-platform-security-chatgpt-plugin-eval-vs-msoedov-agentic-security" tools: ["llm-platform-security-chatgpt-plugin-eval", "msoedov-agentic-security"] --- # chatgpt-plugin-eval vs agentic_security *GraphCanon updated Aug 5, 2026* ## Verdict Pick chatgpt-plugin-eval if chatgpt-plugin-eval is an evaluation framework designed specifically to assess security, privacy, and safety concerns related to third-party plugins interfacing with large language models like ChatGPT; pick agentic_security if agentic Security is an agent-based framework for scanning vulnerabilities in large language models with a Python-based toolkit for robust security assessments via fuzz testing. [chatgpt-plugin-eval](https://llm-platform-security.github.io/chatgpt-plugin-eval/) reports 29 GitHub stars, 7 forks, and 1 open issues, last pushed Jul 29, 2024. [agentic_security](https://agentic-security.vercel.app) has 1.9k stars, 270 forks, and 70 open issues, last pushed Jun 23, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [chatgpt-plugin-eval's repository](https://github.com/llm-platform-security/chatgpt-plugin-eval) and [agentic_security's repository](https://github.com/msoedov/agentic_security). | | [chatgpt-plugin-eval](/tools/llm-platform-security-chatgpt-plugin-eval.md) | [agentic_security](/tools/msoedov-agentic-security.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Tagline | Framework for Evaluating Security in LLM Plugin Ecosystems | Agentic LLM Vulnerability Scanner / AI red teaming kit | | Stars | 29 | 1,943 | | Forks | 7 | 270 | | Open issues | 1 | 70 | | Language | HTML | Python | | Adopt for | chatgpt-plugin-eval is an evaluation framework designed specifically to assess security, privacy, and safety concerns related to third-party plugins interfacing with large language models like ChatGPT. | Agentic Security is an agent-based framework for scanning vulnerabilities in large language models with a Python-based toolkit for robust security assessments via fuzz testing. | | Persona | - | - | | Runtime | - | - | | License | The license information for chatgpt-plugin-eval is unknown. | Apache-2.0 - Permissive license encouraging free use and modification under the condition of preserving notices. | | Categories | Evaluation & Observability | Evaluation & Observability, LLM Frameworks | ## Trust and health _Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._ | | [chatgpt-plugin-eval](/tools/llm-platform-security-chatgpt-plugin-eval.md) | [agentic_security](/tools/msoedov-agentic-security.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Maintenance | Dormant (18%) | Steady (60%) | | Days since push | 736d | 35d | | Open issues (now) | 1 | 70 | | Owner type | Organization | User | | Full report | [trust report](/tools/llm-platform-security-chatgpt-plugin-eval/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/msoedov-agentic-security/trust.md) | ## Decision facts: chatgpt-plugin-eval - **Pricing:** freemium - **Adopt for:** chatgpt-plugin-eval is an evaluation framework designed specifically to assess security, privacy, and safety concerns related to third-party plugins interfacing with large language models like ChatGPT. - **License detail:** The license information for chatgpt-plugin-eval is unknown. ## Decision facts: agentic_security - **Adopt for:** Agentic Security is an agent-based framework for scanning vulnerabilities in large language models with a Python-based toolkit for robust security assessments via fuzz testing. - **License detail:** Apache-2.0 - Permissive license encouraging free use and modification under the condition of preserving notices. ## Choose when ### Choose chatgpt-plugin-eval if… - chatgpt-plugin-eval is primarily HTML; agentic_security is Python. - Tags unique to chatgpt-plugin-eval: chatgpt, llm-plugins, privacy, security. - - When evaluating the security risks of integrating third-party services into your LLM platform through plugins ### Choose agentic_security if… - agentic_security is primarily Python; chatgpt-plugin-eval is HTML. - Tags unique to agentic_security: agent-framework, fuzzing, llm-evaluation, red-teaming. - Also covers LLM Frameworks. - agentic_security ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment. - Developers need to ensure their LLMs are secure from jailbreak attempts and vulnerabilities. ## When NOT to use chatgpt-plugin-eval - - In cases where only generic, high-level security guidance is required without an in-depth framework analysis - - When the primary focus is on improving performance metrics rather than addressing specific security and privacy concerns of LLM plugins ## When NOT to use agentic_security - Teams require solutions that do not involve agent frameworks for vulnerability scanning. - Projects seek a no-fuzz-testing approach for evaluating LLM security. ## Common questions ### What is the difference between chatgpt-plugin-eval and agentic_security? chatgpt-plugin-eval: Framework for Evaluating Security in LLM Plugin Ecosystems. agentic_security: Agentic LLM Vulnerability Scanner / AI red teaming kit. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories. ### When should I choose chatgpt-plugin-eval over agentic_security? Choose chatgpt-plugin-eval over agentic_security when chatgpt-plugin-eval is primarily HTML; agentic_security is Python; Tags unique to chatgpt-plugin-eval: chatgpt, llm-plugins, privacy, security; - When evaluating the security risks of integrating third-party services into your LLM platform through plugins. ### When should I choose agentic_security over chatgpt-plugin-eval? Choose agentic_security over chatgpt-plugin-eval when agentic_security is primarily Python; chatgpt-plugin-eval is HTML; Tags unique to agentic_security: agent-framework, fuzzing, llm-evaluation, red-teaming; Also covers LLM Frameworks; agentic_security ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; Developers need to ensure their LLMs are secure from jailbreak attempts and vulnerabilities. ### When should I avoid chatgpt-plugin-eval? - In cases where only generic, high-level security guidance is required without an in-depth framework analysis - When the primary focus is on improving performance metrics rather than addressing specific security and privacy concerns of LLM plugins ### When should I avoid agentic_security? Teams require solutions that do not involve agent frameworks for vulnerability scanning. Projects seek a no-fuzz-testing approach for evaluating LLM security. ### Is chatgpt-plugin-eval or agentic_security more popular on GitHub? agentic_security has more GitHub stars (1,943 vs 29). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints. ### Are chatgpt-plugin-eval and agentic_security open source? Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub. ### Where can I find alternatives to chatgpt-plugin-eval or agentic_security? GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [chatgpt-plugin-eval alternatives](/tools/llm-platform-security-chatgpt-plugin-eval/alternatives) and [agentic_security alternatives](/tools/msoedov-agentic-security/alternatives) ([chatgpt-plugin-eval markdown twin](/tools/llm-platform-security-chatgpt-plugin-eval/alternatives.md), [agentic_security markdown twin](/tools/msoedov-agentic-security/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes. ### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison? Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/llm-platform-security-chatgpt-plugin-eval-vs-msoedov-agentic-security.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers. ### Which is better maintained, chatgpt-plugin-eval or agentic_security? chatgpt-plugin-eval: Dormant. agentic_security: Steady. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance. ### Where are the full trust reports for chatgpt-plugin-eval and agentic_security? GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [chatgpt-plugin-eval trust report](/tools/llm-platform-security-chatgpt-plugin-eval/trust); [agentic_security trust report](/tools/msoedov-agentic-security/trust). --- **Machine-readable endpoints** - JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=llm-platform-security-chatgpt-plugin-eval`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=llm-platform-security-chatgpt-plugin-eval) - LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt) - Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt) _GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_