---
title: "chatgpt-plugin-eval vs awesome-ai-agents-security"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/llm-platform-security-chatgpt-plugin-eval-vs-projectrecon-awesome-ai-agents-security"
tools: ["llm-platform-security-chatgpt-plugin-eval", "projectrecon-awesome-ai-agents-security"]
---

# chatgpt-plugin-eval vs awesome-ai-agents-security

*GraphCanon updated Aug 9, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick chatgpt-plugin-eval if chatgpt-plugin-eval is an evaluation framework designed specifically to assess security, privacy, and safety concerns related to third-party plugins interfacing with large language models like ChatGPT; pick awesome-ai-agents-security if awesome-ai-agents-security is a curated list of open-source tools for securing autonomous AI agents, covering the security lifecycle from red teaming to runtime protection.

[chatgpt-plugin-eval](https://llm-platform-security.github.io/chatgpt-plugin-eval/) reports 29 GitHub stars, 7 forks, and 1 open issues, last pushed Jul 29, 2024. [awesome-ai-agents-security](https://github.com/ProjectRecon/awesome-ai-agents-security) has 59 stars, 74 forks, and 61 open issues, last pushed Jun 12, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [chatgpt-plugin-eval's repository](https://github.com/llm-platform-security/chatgpt-plugin-eval) and [awesome-ai-agents-security's repository](https://github.com/ProjectRecon/awesome-ai-agents-security).

| | [chatgpt-plugin-eval](/tools/llm-platform-security-chatgpt-plugin-eval.md) | [awesome-ai-agents-security](/tools/projectrecon-awesome-ai-agents-security.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | Framework for Evaluating Security in LLM Plugin Ecosystems | A curated list of open-source tools and resources for securing autonomous AI agents. |
| Stars | 29 | 59 |
| Forks | 7 | 74 |
| Open issues | 1 | 61 |
| Language | HTML | - |
| Adopt for | chatgpt-plugin-eval is an evaluation framework designed specifically to assess security, privacy, and safety concerns related to third-party plugins interfacing with large language models like ChatGPT. | awesome-ai-agents-security is a curated list of open-source tools for securing autonomous AI agents, covering the security lifecycle from red teaming to runtime protection. |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | The license information for chatgpt-plugin-eval is unknown. | Other |
| Categories | Evaluation & Observability | AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [chatgpt-plugin-eval](/tools/llm-platform-security-chatgpt-plugin-eval.md) | [awesome-ai-agents-security](/tools/projectrecon-awesome-ai-agents-security.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maintenance | Dormant (18%) | Steady (60%) |
| Days since push | 736d | 58d |
| Open issues (now) | 1 | 61 |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/llm-platform-security-chatgpt-plugin-eval/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/projectrecon-awesome-ai-agents-security/trust.md) |

## Decision facts: chatgpt-plugin-eval

- **Pricing:** freemium
- **Adopt for:** chatgpt-plugin-eval is an evaluation framework designed specifically to assess security, privacy, and safety concerns related to third-party plugins interfacing with large language models like ChatGPT.
- **License detail:** The license information for chatgpt-plugin-eval is unknown.

## Decision facts: awesome-ai-agents-security

- **Adopt for:** awesome-ai-agents-security is a curated list of open-source tools for securing autonomous AI agents, covering the security lifecycle from red teaming to runtime protection.

## Choose when

### Choose chatgpt-plugin-eval if…

- Tags unique to chatgpt-plugin-eval: chatgpt, llm-plugins, privacy, security.
- - When evaluating the security risks of integrating third-party services into your LLM platform through plugins
- Leaner open-issue backlog (1).

### Choose awesome-ai-agents-security if…

- Tags unique to awesome-ai-agents-security: ai-agents, ai-security, autonomous-agents, awesome-list.
- Also covers AI Agents.
- When needing a comprehensive overview of open-source tools for securing autonomous AI agents across different phases such as red teaming and runtime protection

## When NOT to use chatgpt-plugin-eval

- - In cases where only generic, high-level security guidance is required without an in-depth framework analysis
- - When the primary focus is on improving performance metrics rather than addressing specific security and privacy concerns of LLM plugins

## When NOT to use awesome-ai-agents-security

- When you require real-time threat intelligence feeds, which are not provided by this repository's static resource lists
- For organizations focusing on proprietary tools and resources that prefer not to use open-source solutions for their AI agents' security lifecycle management

## Common questions

### What is the difference between chatgpt-plugin-eval and awesome-ai-agents-security?

chatgpt-plugin-eval: Framework for Evaluating Security in LLM Plugin Ecosystems. awesome-ai-agents-security: A curated list of open-source tools and resources for securing autonomous AI agents.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose chatgpt-plugin-eval over awesome-ai-agents-security?

Choose chatgpt-plugin-eval over awesome-ai-agents-security when Tags unique to chatgpt-plugin-eval: chatgpt, llm-plugins, privacy, security; - When evaluating the security risks of integrating third-party services into your LLM platform through plugins; Leaner open-issue backlog (1).

### When should I choose awesome-ai-agents-security over chatgpt-plugin-eval?

Choose awesome-ai-agents-security over chatgpt-plugin-eval when Tags unique to awesome-ai-agents-security: ai-agents, ai-security, autonomous-agents, awesome-list; Also covers AI Agents; When needing a comprehensive overview of open-source tools for securing autonomous AI agents across different phases such as red teaming and runtime protection.

### When should I avoid chatgpt-plugin-eval?

- In cases where only generic, high-level security guidance is required without an in-depth framework analysis - When the primary focus is on improving performance metrics rather than addressing specific security and privacy concerns of LLM plugins

### When should I avoid awesome-ai-agents-security?

When you require real-time threat intelligence feeds, which are not provided by this repository's static resource lists For organizations focusing on proprietary tools and resources that prefer not to use open-source solutions for their AI agents' security lifecycle management

### Is chatgpt-plugin-eval or awesome-ai-agents-security more popular on GitHub?

awesome-ai-agents-security has more GitHub stars (59 vs 29). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are chatgpt-plugin-eval and awesome-ai-agents-security open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub.

### Where can I find alternatives to chatgpt-plugin-eval or awesome-ai-agents-security?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [chatgpt-plugin-eval alternatives](/tools/llm-platform-security-chatgpt-plugin-eval/alternatives) and [awesome-ai-agents-security alternatives](/tools/projectrecon-awesome-ai-agents-security/alternatives) ([chatgpt-plugin-eval markdown twin](/tools/llm-platform-security-chatgpt-plugin-eval/alternatives.md), [awesome-ai-agents-security markdown twin](/tools/projectrecon-awesome-ai-agents-security/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/llm-platform-security-chatgpt-plugin-eval-vs-projectrecon-awesome-ai-agents-security.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, chatgpt-plugin-eval or awesome-ai-agents-security?

chatgpt-plugin-eval: Dormant. awesome-ai-agents-security: Steady. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for chatgpt-plugin-eval and awesome-ai-agents-security?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [chatgpt-plugin-eval trust report](/tools/llm-platform-security-chatgpt-plugin-eval/trust); [awesome-ai-agents-security trust report](/tools/projectrecon-awesome-ai-agents-security/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=llm-platform-security-chatgpt-plugin-eval`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=llm-platform-security-chatgpt-plugin-eval)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_