---
title: "hopsworks vs awesome-mlops"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/logicalclocks-hopsworks-vs-visenger-awesome-mlops"
tools: ["logicalclocks-hopsworks", "visenger-awesome-mlops"]
---

# hopsworks vs awesome-mlops

*GraphCanon updated Aug 4, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick hopsworks if hopsworks, an ML platform with robust data management and model serving capabilities, supports multiple cloud environments like AWS, Azure, and GCP; pick awesome-mlops if awesome-mlops curates MLOps resources focusing on diverse deployment strategies and tooling.

[hopsworks](https://hopsworks.ai) reports 1.3k GitHub stars, 160 forks, and 16 open issues, last pushed Feb 10, 2025. [awesome-mlops](https://ml-ops.org) has 14k stars, 2.1k forks, and 44 open issues, last pushed Nov 21, 2024. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [hopsworks's repository](https://github.com/logicalclocks/hopsworks) and [awesome-mlops's repository](https://github.com/visenger/awesome-mlops).

| | [hopsworks](/tools/logicalclocks-hopsworks.md) | [awesome-mlops](/tools/visenger-awesome-mlops.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | Data-Intensive AI platform with Feature Store | A curated list of references for MLOps |
| Stars | 1,302 | 14,127 |
| Forks | 160 | 2,101 |
| Open issues | 16 | 44 |
| Language | Java | - |
| Adopt for | Hopsworks, an ML platform with robust data management and model serving capabilities, supports multiple cloud environments like AWS, Azure, and GCP. | awesome-mlops curates MLOps resources focusing on diverse deployment strategies and tooling. |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | - |
| Categories | Evaluation & Observability, Inference & Serving, Model Training | Inference & Serving, Model Training |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [hopsworks](/tools/logicalclocks-hopsworks.md) | [awesome-mlops](/tools/visenger-awesome-mlops.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Days since push | 539d | 621d |
| Open issues (now) | 16 | 44 |
| Owner type | Organization | User |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/logicalclocks-hopsworks/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/visenger-awesome-mlops/trust.md) |

## Shared compatibility

- **Python**: [hopsworks](/tools/logicalclocks-hopsworks.md) - Python runtime; [awesome-mlops](/tools/visenger-awesome-mlops.md) - Python runtime

## Decision facts: hopsworks

- **Adopt for:** Hopsworks, an ML platform with robust data management and model serving capabilities, supports multiple cloud environments like AWS, Azure, and GCP.

## Decision facts: awesome-mlops

- **Adopt for:** awesome-mlops curates MLOps resources focusing on diverse deployment strategies and tooling.

## Choose when

### Choose hopsworks if…

- Tags unique to hopsworks: aws, azure, feature-store, gcp.
- Also covers Evaluation & Observability.
- When project requirements include a comprehensive feature store for AI applications

### Choose awesome-mlops if…

- Tags unique to awesome-mlops: ai, data-science, devops, engineering.
- If you need references covering online training and inference service architecture patterns, consider awesome-mlops.
- More GitHub stars (14k vs 1.3k) - visibility, not fit.

## When NOT to use hopsworks

- If developers prefer a tool requiring less computational resources to install
- In scenarios where the preferred language is not Java and compatibility is an issue

## When NOT to use awesome-mlops

- Avoid if focused solely on a single MLOps tool or framework as this is a broad resource list.
- Not suitable for those seeking end-to-end support beyond references, like hands-on deployment assistance.

## Common questions

### What is the difference between hopsworks and awesome-mlops?

hopsworks: Data-Intensive AI platform with Feature Store. awesome-mlops: A curated list of references for MLOps. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose hopsworks over awesome-mlops?

Choose hopsworks over awesome-mlops when Tags unique to hopsworks: aws, azure, feature-store, gcp; Also covers Evaluation & Observability; When project requirements include a comprehensive feature store for AI applications.

### When should I choose awesome-mlops over hopsworks?

Choose awesome-mlops over hopsworks when Tags unique to awesome-mlops: ai, data-science, devops, engineering; If you need references covering online training and inference service architecture patterns, consider awesome-mlops; More GitHub stars (14k vs 1.3k) - visibility, not fit.

### When should I avoid hopsworks?

If developers prefer a tool requiring less computational resources to install In scenarios where the preferred language is not Java and compatibility is an issue

### When should I avoid awesome-mlops?

Avoid if focused solely on a single MLOps tool or framework as this is a broad resource list. Not suitable for those seeking end-to-end support beyond references, like hands-on deployment assistance.

### Is hopsworks or awesome-mlops more popular on GitHub?

awesome-mlops has more GitHub stars (14,127 vs 1,302). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are hopsworks and awesome-mlops open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub.

### Where can I find alternatives to hopsworks or awesome-mlops?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [hopsworks alternatives](/tools/logicalclocks-hopsworks/alternatives) and [awesome-mlops alternatives](/tools/visenger-awesome-mlops/alternatives) ([hopsworks markdown twin](/tools/logicalclocks-hopsworks/alternatives.md), [awesome-mlops markdown twin](/tools/visenger-awesome-mlops/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/logicalclocks-hopsworks-vs-visenger-awesome-mlops.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, hopsworks or awesome-mlops?

hopsworks: Dormant. awesome-mlops: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for hopsworks and awesome-mlops?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [hopsworks trust report](/tools/logicalclocks-hopsworks/trust); [awesome-mlops trust report](/tools/visenger-awesome-mlops/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=logicalclocks-hopsworks`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=logicalclocks-hopsworks)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
