---
title: "browser-agent vs Agent-Reach"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/magnitudedev-browser-agent-vs-panniantong-agent-reach"
tools: ["magnitudedev-browser-agent", "panniantong-agent-reach"]
---

# browser-agent vs Agent-Reach

*GraphCanon updated Jul 15, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick browser-agent when browser-agent is primarily TypeScript; Agent-Reach is Python; pick Agent-Reach when agent-Reach is primarily Python; browser-agent is TypeScript.

[browser-agent](https://magnitude.run) reports 4.1k GitHub stars, 231 forks, and 33 open issues, last pushed Feb 8, 2026. [Agent-Reach](https://github.com/Panniantong/Agent-Reach) has 55k stars, 4.5k forks, and 144 open issues, last pushed Jul 10, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [browser-agent's repository](https://github.com/magnitudedev/browser-agent) and [Agent-Reach's repository](https://github.com/Panniantong/Agent-Reach).

| | [browser-agent](/tools/magnitudedev-browser-agent.md) | [Agent-Reach](/tools/panniantong-agent-reach.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | Open-source, vision-first browser agent | AI Agent for Automated Web and Social Media Data Extraction |
| Stars | 4,095 | 54,715 |
| Forks | 231 | 4,509 |
| Open issues | 33 | 144 |
| Language | TypeScript | Python |
| Adopt for | - | Agent-Reach facilitates hands-off web and social media scraping via command line with no API costs for retrieving varied internet content. |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Categories | AI Agents, Computer Vision | AI Agents, Data & Retrieval |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [browser-agent](/tools/magnitudedev-browser-agent.md) | [Agent-Reach](/tools/panniantong-agent-reach.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maintenance | Slowing (36%) | Very active (96%) |
| Days since push | 156d | 0d |
| Open issues (now) | 33 | 144 |
| Owner type | Organization | User |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/magnitudedev-browser-agent/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/panniantong-agent-reach/trust.md) |

## Decision facts: Agent-Reach

- **Adopt for:** Agent-Reach facilitates hands-off web and social media scraping via command line with no API costs for retrieving varied internet content.

## Choose when

### Choose browser-agent if…

- browser-agent is primarily TypeScript; Agent-Reach is Python.
- License: browser-agent is Apache-2.0, Agent-Reach is MIT.
- Tags unique to browser-agent: ai, browser, framework, javascipt.
- Also covers Computer Vision.

### Choose Agent-Reach if…

- Agent-Reach is primarily Python; browser-agent is TypeScript.
- License: Agent-Reach is MIT, browser-agent is Apache-2.0.
- Tags unique to Agent-Reach: agent-infrastructure, ai-agent, ai-search, bilibili.
- Also covers Data & Retrieval.
- When needing to bypass costly API fees for extensive social media platform data extraction

## When NOT to use browser-agent

- Last GitHub push was 156 days ago (slowing maintenance, Feb 8, 2026). Validate activity before betting a new project on browser-agent.
- AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.

## When NOT to use Agent-Reach

- If strict compliance with website scraping policies is critical due to its use of scraping techniques
- When direct interaction through APIs for precision and reliability is preferred over scraping

## Common questions

### What is the difference between browser-agent and Agent-Reach?

browser-agent: Open-source, vision-first browser agent. Agent-Reach: AI Agent for Automated Web and Social Media Data Extraction. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose browser-agent over Agent-Reach?

Choose browser-agent over Agent-Reach when browser-agent is primarily TypeScript; Agent-Reach is Python; License: browser-agent is Apache-2.0, Agent-Reach is MIT; Tags unique to browser-agent: ai, browser, framework, javascipt; Also covers Computer Vision.

### When should I choose Agent-Reach over browser-agent?

Choose Agent-Reach over browser-agent when Agent-Reach is primarily Python; browser-agent is TypeScript; License: Agent-Reach is MIT, browser-agent is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to Agent-Reach: agent-infrastructure, ai-agent, ai-search, bilibili; Also covers Data & Retrieval; When needing to bypass costly API fees for extensive social media platform data extraction.

### When should I avoid browser-agent?

Last GitHub push was 156 days ago (slowing maintenance, Feb 8, 2026). Validate activity before betting a new project on browser-agent. AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.

### When should I avoid Agent-Reach?

If strict compliance with website scraping policies is critical due to its use of scraping techniques When direct interaction through APIs for precision and reliability is preferred over scraping

### Is browser-agent or Agent-Reach more popular on GitHub?

Agent-Reach has more GitHub stars (54,715 vs 4,095). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are browser-agent and Agent-Reach open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (browser-agent: Apache-2.0, Agent-Reach: MIT).

### Where can I find alternatives to browser-agent or Agent-Reach?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [browser-agent alternatives](/tools/magnitudedev-browser-agent/alternatives) and [Agent-Reach alternatives](/tools/panniantong-agent-reach/alternatives) ([browser-agent markdown twin](/tools/magnitudedev-browser-agent/alternatives.md), [Agent-Reach markdown twin](/tools/panniantong-agent-reach/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/magnitudedev-browser-agent-vs-panniantong-agent-reach.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, browser-agent or Agent-Reach?

browser-agent: Slowing. Agent-Reach: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for browser-agent and Agent-Reach?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [browser-agent trust report](/tools/magnitudedev-browser-agent/trust); [Agent-Reach trust report](/tools/panniantong-agent-reach/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=magnitudedev-browser-agent`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=magnitudedev-browser-agent)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
