---
title: "moby vs code2prompt"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/moby-moby-vs-mufeedvh-code2prompt"
tools: ["moby-moby", "mufeedvh-code2prompt"]
---

# moby vs code2prompt

*GraphCanon updated Jul 11, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick moby when moby is primarily Go; code2prompt is Rust; pick code2prompt when code2prompt is primarily Rust; moby is Go.

[moby](https://mobyproject.org/) reports 72k GitHub stars, 19k forks, and 3.8k open issues, last pushed Jul 10, 2026. [code2prompt](https://code2prompt.dev) has 7.5k stars, 426 forks, and 18 open issues, last pushed Jun 29, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [moby's repository](https://github.com/moby/moby) and [code2prompt's repository](https://github.com/mufeedvh/code2prompt).

| | [moby](/tools/moby-moby.md) | [code2prompt](/tools/mufeedvh-code2prompt.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems | A CLI tool to convert your codebase into a single LLM prompt with source tree, prompt templating, and token counting. |
| Stars | 71,899 | 7,467 |
| Forks | 19,126 | 426 |
| Open issues | 3,821 | 18 |
| Language | Go | Rust |
| Adopt for | - | - |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Categories | Developer Tools, Inference & Serving, LLM Frameworks | Developer Tools, LLM Frameworks |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [moby](/tools/moby-moby.md) | [code2prompt](/tools/mufeedvh-code2prompt.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maintenance | Very active (96%) | Active (82%) |
| Days since push | 1d | 11d |
| Open issues (now) | 3.8k | 18 |
| Owner type | Organization | User |
| Security scan | No criticals | No lockfile |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/moby-moby/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/mufeedvh-code2prompt/trust.md) |

## Choose when

### Choose moby if…

- moby is primarily Go; code2prompt is Rust.
- License: moby is Apache-2.0, code2prompt is MIT.
- Tags unique to moby: containers, docker, go, golang.
- Also covers Inference & Serving.
- moby ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.

### Choose code2prompt if…

- code2prompt is primarily Rust; moby is Go.
- License: code2prompt is MIT, moby is Apache-2.0.
- Tags unique to code2prompt: ai, chatgpt, claude, cli.

## When NOT to use moby

- Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
- Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.

## When NOT to use code2prompt

- Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.

## Common questions

### What is the difference between moby and code2prompt?

moby: The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems. code2prompt: A CLI tool to convert your codebase into a single LLM prompt with source tree, prompt templating, and token counting.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose moby over code2prompt?

Choose moby over code2prompt when moby is primarily Go; code2prompt is Rust; License: moby is Apache-2.0, code2prompt is MIT; Tags unique to moby: containers, docker, go, golang; Also covers Inference & Serving; moby ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.

### When should I choose code2prompt over moby?

Choose code2prompt over moby when code2prompt is primarily Rust; moby is Go; License: code2prompt is MIT, moby is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to code2prompt: ai, chatgpt, claude, cli.

### When should I avoid moby?

Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.

### When should I avoid code2prompt?

Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.

### Is moby or code2prompt more popular on GitHub?

moby has more GitHub stars (71,899 vs 7,467). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are moby and code2prompt open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (moby: Apache-2.0, code2prompt: MIT).

### Where can I find alternatives to moby or code2prompt?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [moby alternatives](/tools/moby-moby/alternatives) and [code2prompt alternatives](/tools/mufeedvh-code2prompt/alternatives) ([moby markdown twin](/tools/moby-moby/alternatives.md), [code2prompt markdown twin](/tools/mufeedvh-code2prompt/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/moby-moby-vs-mufeedvh-code2prompt.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, moby or code2prompt?

moby: Very active. code2prompt: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for moby and code2prompt?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [moby trust report](/tools/moby-moby/trust); [code2prompt trust report](/tools/mufeedvh-code2prompt/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=moby-moby`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=moby-moby)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
