--- title: "JOOD vs awesome" type: "comparison" canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/naver-ai-jood-vs-sindresorhus-awesome" tools: ["naver-ai-jood", "sindresorhus-awesome"] --- # JOOD vs awesome *GraphCanon updated Jul 12, 2026* ## Verdict Pick JOOD when license: JOOD is Apache-2.0, awesome is CC0-1.0; pick awesome when license: awesome is CC0-1.0, JOOD is Apache-2.0. [JOOD](https://github.com/naver-ai/JOOD) reports 21 GitHub stars, 4 forks, and 2 open issues, last pushed Jun 11, 2025. [awesome](https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome) has 484k stars, 36k forks, and 92 open issues, last pushed Jun 30, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [JOOD's repository](https://github.com/naver-ai/JOOD) and [awesome's repository](https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome). | | [JOOD](/tools/naver-ai-jood.md) | [awesome](/tools/sindresorhus-awesome.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Tagline | [CVPR 2025] Official implementation for JOOD "Playing the Fool: Jailbreaking LLMs and Multimodal LLMs with Out-of-Distribution Strategy" | 😎 Curated list of awesome topics including hardware resources | | Stars | 21 | 484,026 | | Forks | 4 | 35,799 | | Open issues | 2 | 92 | | Language | Python | - | | Adopt for | - | - | | Persona | - | - | | Runtime | - | - | | License | Apache-2.0 | CC0-1.0 | | Categories | LLM Frameworks | LLM Frameworks | ## Trust and health _Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._ | | [JOOD](/tools/naver-ai-jood.md) | [awesome](/tools/sindresorhus-awesome.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Maintenance | Dormant (18%) | Active (82%) | | Days since push | 395d | 11d | | Open issues (now) | 2 | 92 | | Owner type | Organization | User | | Security scan | 50 low (50 low) | No lockfile | | Full report | [trust report](/tools/naver-ai-jood/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/sindresorhus-awesome/trust.md) | ## Choose when ### Choose JOOD if… - License: JOOD is Apache-2.0, awesome is CC0-1.0. - Tags unique to JOOD: python. - Leaner open-issue backlog (2). ### Choose awesome if… - License: awesome is CC0-1.0, JOOD is Apache-2.0. - Tags unique to awesome: awesome-list, resources. - More GitHub stars (484k vs 21) - visibility, not fit. ## When NOT to use JOOD - Last GitHub push was 395 days ago (dormant maintenance, Jun 11, 2025). Validate activity before betting a new project on JOOD. - LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. ## When NOT to use awesome - LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. ## Common questions ### What is the difference between JOOD and awesome? JOOD: [CVPR 2025] Official implementation for JOOD "Playing the Fool: Jailbreaking LLMs and Multimodal LLMs with Out-of-Distribution Strategy". awesome: 😎 Curated list of awesome topics including hardware resources. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories. ### When should I choose JOOD over awesome? Choose JOOD over awesome when License: JOOD is Apache-2.0, awesome is CC0-1.0; Tags unique to JOOD: python; Leaner open-issue backlog (2). ### When should I choose awesome over JOOD? Choose awesome over JOOD when License: awesome is CC0-1.0, JOOD is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to awesome: awesome-list, resources; More GitHub stars (484k vs 21) - visibility, not fit. ### When should I avoid JOOD? Last GitHub push was 395 days ago (dormant maintenance, Jun 11, 2025). Validate activity before betting a new project on JOOD. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. ### When should I avoid awesome? LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. ### Is JOOD or awesome more popular on GitHub? awesome has more GitHub stars (484,026 vs 21). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints. ### Are JOOD and awesome open source? Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (JOOD: Apache-2.0, awesome: CC0-1.0). ### Where can I find alternatives to JOOD or awesome? GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [JOOD alternatives](/tools/naver-ai-jood/alternatives) and [awesome alternatives](/tools/sindresorhus-awesome/alternatives) ([JOOD markdown twin](/tools/naver-ai-jood/alternatives.md), [awesome markdown twin](/tools/sindresorhus-awesome/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes. ### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison? Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/naver-ai-jood-vs-sindresorhus-awesome.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers. ### Which is better maintained, JOOD or awesome? JOOD: Dormant. awesome: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance. ### Where are the full trust reports for JOOD and awesome? GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [JOOD trust report](/tools/naver-ai-jood/trust); [awesome trust report](/tools/sindresorhus-awesome/trust). --- **Machine-readable endpoints** - JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=naver-ai-jood`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=naver-ai-jood) - LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt) - Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt) _GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_